12:00:25 <jki> #startmeeting CIP IRC weekly meeting
12:00:25 <collab-meetbot`> Meeting started Thu Oct 15 12:00:25 2026 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is jki. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
12:00:25 <collab-meetbot`> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
12:00:25 <collab-meetbot`> The meeting name has been set to 'cip_irc_weekly_meeting'
12:00:34 <jki> #topic AI review
12:01:01 <jki> left none here, but I should actually update the SECURITY.md proposal...
12:01:09 <jki> so: ongoing
12:01:20 <jki> anything else I forgot?
12:01:41 <jki> 5
12:01:43 <jki> 4
12:01:45 <jki> 3
12:01:47 <jki> 2
12:01:49 <jki> 1
12:01:53 <jki> #topic Kernel maintenance updates
12:02:11 <masami> This week reported 57 new CVEs and 8 updated CVEs.
12:02:12 <uli> started with 4.19, 1500+ patches incoming...
12:02:18 <pave1> I was reviewing 6.12.112, 113.
12:02:29 <jki> ugh
12:02:51 <jki> iwamatsu wrote: "I reviewed v6.12.107,107 and 108.And I am reviewing v6.12.109."
12:03:26 <jki> anything else?
12:03:50 <jki> 5
12:03:52 <jki> 4
12:03:53 <jki> 3
12:03:55 <jki> 2
12:03:57 <jki> 1
12:04:02 <jki> #topic Kernel release status
12:04:14 <jki> 6.12 is late but to be released soon
12:04:42 <jki> 4.19 is WIP as well
12:05:37 <jki> 4.4 has a bit time to process those 1500+ patches, at least formally
12:05:57 <jki> uli: hope you extra estimations will hold
12:06:11 <uli> we'll see...
12:07:03 <jki> anything to add?
12:07:44 <jki> 5
12:07:45 <jki> 4
12:07:47 <jki> 3
12:07:49 <jki> 2
12:07:50 <jki> 1
12:07:52 <jki> #topic Kernel testing
12:08:05 <patersonc> No updates from em
12:08:08 <patersonc> or me
12:08:27 <pave1> Kernel ci starting sending "sucess" mails to the list.
12:08:35 <jki> noticed as well
12:08:39 <pave1> I believe agreement was only about regressions.
12:08:39 <jki> automatically?
12:08:42 <pave1> "[STATUS] cip/linux-5.10.y-cip - 0102f22d463079b2be8a559a220000399c41fbe0".
12:08:47 <pave1> This is not useful.
12:09:01 <patersonc> Pavel you wanted to know when a CI run had "completed"
12:09:20 <pave1> Okay, I meant on the webpage, not like this.
12:09:20 <patersonc> I can turn off again if you prefer
12:09:37 <jki> push vs. pull
12:09:40 <pave1> Yes please.
12:10:03 <patersonc> Unless others find it useful?
12:10:13 <jki> that is what I was about to ask we well
12:10:24 <jki> uli:?
12:10:38 <uli> i'd prefer non-email as well
12:11:02 <jki> then let it be unless iwamatsu has different arguments
12:12:15 <jki> more on testing?
12:12:41 <jki> 5
12:12:43 <jki> 4
12:12:44 <jki> 3
12:12:46 <jki> 2
12:12:47 <jki> 1
12:12:51 <jki> #topic AOB
12:13:15 <jki> uli: extra budget formally approved just now
12:13:22 <uli> thx
12:13:49 <jki> I'll be absent next week and likely the week after as well, iwamatsu-san will run the meetings
12:15:03 <jki> then I just recalled one general todo for the maintainers: please briefly dump ideas on an ideal patch review workflow/coordination
12:15:31 <jki> something we could later on derive better tooling/visualization/etc. from
12:15:47 <pave1> Yep.
12:17:09 <jki> next Tuesday (TSC), I will remind again that the kernel team needs further support, and that member need to think about whether they prefer to delegate that or if CIP needs to contract it
12:17:38 <jki> cleare topic definition remains a todo, but those also depend on who is able to support
12:18:18 <jki> any other topics for today?
12:19:15 <jki> 5
12:19:17 <jki> 4
12:19:19 <jki> 3
12:19:20 <jki> 2
12:19:22 <jki> 1
12:19:24 <jki> #endmeeting