13:59:39 <rpaik> #startmeeting  LFN TAC meeting
13:59:39 <collabot`> Meeting started Wed Apr 11 13:59:39 2018 UTC.  The chair is rpaik. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
13:59:39 <collabot`> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic.
13:59:39 <collabot`> The meeting name has been set to 'lfn_tac_meeting'
14:00:07 <rpaik> #chair phrobb
14:00:07 <collabot`> Current chairs: phrobb rpaik
14:00:10 <dfarrell07> #info Daniel Farrell
14:00:16 <frankbrockners> #info Frank Brockners
14:00:22 <rossella_s> #info Rossella Sblendido
14:00:27 <ttallgren> #info Tapio Tallgren
14:00:39 <pcarver> #info Paul Carver
14:01:30 <dfarrell07> Is this still the correct meeting? https://zoom.us/j/204141707 "Waiting for host to start meeting"
14:02:01 <phrobb> dfarrell07: checking....
14:02:01 <JasonHunt> https://zoom.us/j/468557487
14:02:13 <phrobb> thanks JasonHunt
14:02:26 <dfarrell07> thanks JasonHunt
14:02:34 * dfarrell07 updates ODL cal
14:02:52 <edwarnicke_> #infoed edwarnicke_
14:03:22 <dfarrell07> edwarnicke_: has his own meetbot commands ;)
14:03:35 <JasonHunt> #info Jason Hunt, IBM
14:04:01 <afredette> #info Andre Fredette
14:04:59 <timirnich> #info Tim Irnich
14:05:34 <rpaik> #info new TAC members from Vodafone & Turk Telekom shared
14:05:55 <rpaik> #topic Project Review Process
14:07:35 <randybias> s/opencontrail/tungsten fabric/  ... please
14:08:25 <rpaik> #info  GB feedback was to have a project lifecycle and project review rubric in place as review was being done for Tungsten Fabric
14:10:45 <rpaik> #info discussion on making a request to the GB on collaborating on developing a rubric for project review
14:13:32 <rpaik> #info project lifecycle document  is based on the CNCF model and could be used as a starting point
14:14:10 <rpaik> #info frankbrockners asks what is the purpose of having a project lifecycle?
14:16:30 <rpaik> #info phrobb notes that reason for GB having a bigger role in LFN (vs. CNCF) is that the GB has a wider view on budget, strategic issues, etc.
14:22:36 <rpaik> #info randybias suggests that it'd be better to take both top-down & bottoms-up approach
14:29:03 <rpaik> #info discussion on working from the current draft vs. starting with a blank slate
14:35:21 <phrobb> Shall the TAC recommend to the Governing Board to delegate to the TAC and the underlying technical communities to create a draft of the Project Proposal Process, along with the Project Lifecycle and TAC-Project process.  The resulting document(s) would then be provided to the Governing Board for review, editing, and approval? -1, 0, +1
14:35:37 <ttallgren> #vote +1
14:36:15 <phrobb> #startvote Shall the TAC recommend to the Governing Board to delegate to the TAC and the underlying technical communities to create a draft of the Project Proposal Process, along with the Project Lifecycle and TAC-Project process.  The resulting document(s) would then be provided to the Governing Board for review, editing, and approval? -1, 0, +1
14:36:15 <collabot`> Begin voting on: Shall the TAC recommend to the Governing Board to delegate to the TAC and the underlying technical communities to create a draft of the Project Proposal Process, along with the Project Lifecycle and TAC-Project process.  The resulting document(s) would then be provided to the Governing Board for review, editing, and approval? Valid vote options are -1, 0, +1.
14:36:15 <collabot`> Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts.
14:36:19 <edwarnicke_> #vote +1
14:36:20 <dfarrell07> #vote +1
14:36:20 <ttallgren> #vote +1
14:36:20 <JasonHunt> #vote +1
14:36:21 <Wenjing> #vote +1
14:36:22 <frankbrockners> #vote +1
14:36:24 <rossella_s> #vote +1
14:36:29 <afredette> #vote +1
14:36:33 <timirnich> #vote +1
14:36:47 <gilbert> #vote +1
14:36:50 <jamil_> #vote +1
14:37:08 <rpaik> #vote +1
14:37:09 <tykeal> I so haven't heard that excuse in a while
14:37:20 <bjskerry_> #vote +1
14:37:25 <rpaik> #info proxy for Vodafone
14:37:53 <bjskerry_> #info covering for Rajesh Gadiyar (Intel)
14:38:17 * randybias approves/yes
14:38:23 <randybias> had to rejoin
14:38:37 <randybias> #vote +1
14:38:43 <phrobb> #endvote
14:38:43 <collabot`> Voted on "Shall the TAC recommend to the Governing Board to delegate to the TAC and the underlying technical communities to create a draft of the Project Proposal Process, along with the Project Lifecycle and TAC-Project process.  The resulting document(s) would then be provided to the Governing Board for review, editing, and approval?" Results are
14:38:43 <collabot`> +1 (14): edwarnicke_, frankbrockners, timirnich, bjskerry_, JasonHunt, jamil_, dfarrell07, ttallgren, randybias, afredette, rossella_s, gilbert, rpaik, Wenjing
14:44:23 <rpaik> #info discussion on using an existing repo if a new LFN repo can be created soon
14:44:39 * frankbrockners is happy to be part of the drafting group
14:46:15 <rpaik> #info if you're interested in joining the project lifecycle working group ping rpaik/phrobb
14:50:53 <rpaik> #topic TAC leadership roles
14:51:21 <rpaik> #info concerns about a single GB representative being able to represent all communities
14:59:48 <rpaik> #info phrobb notes that there is also a committer representative to the GB
15:01:02 <rpaik> #info discussion to continue via mailing lists
15:01:25 <rpaik> #endmeeting