=============================
#lfn-meeting: LFN TAC meeting
=============================


Meeting started by rpaik at 13:59:39 UTC.  The full logs are available
at
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/lfn-meeting/2018/lfn-meeting.2018-04-11-13.59.log.html
.



Meeting summary
---------------

* Daniel Farrell  (dfarrell07, 14:00:10)
* Frank Brockners  (frankbrockners, 14:00:16)
* Rossella Sblendido  (rossella_s, 14:00:22)
* Tapio Tallgren  (ttallgren, 14:00:27)
* Paul Carver  (pcarver, 14:00:39)
* LINK: https://zoom.us/j/468557487  (JasonHunt, 14:02:01)
* Jason Hunt, IBM  (JasonHunt, 14:03:35)
* Andre Fredette  (afredette, 14:04:01)
* Tim Irnich  (timirnich, 14:04:59)
* new TAC members from Vodafone & Turk Telekom shared  (rpaik, 14:05:34)
* Project Review Process  (rpaik, 14:05:55)
  * GB feedback was to have a project lifecycle and project review
    rubric in place as review was being done for Tungsten Fabric
    (rpaik, 14:08:25)
  * discussion on making a request to the GB on collaborating on
    developing a rubric for project review  (rpaik, 14:10:45)
  * project lifecycle document  is based on the CNCF model and could be
    used as a starting point  (rpaik, 14:13:32)
  * frankbrockners asks what is the purpose of having a project
    lifecycle?  (rpaik, 14:14:10)
  * phrobb notes that reason for GB having a bigger role in LFN (vs.
    CNCF) is that the GB has a wider view on budget, strategic issues,
    etc.  (rpaik, 14:16:30)
  * randybias suggests that it'd be better to take both top-down &
    bottoms-up approach  (rpaik, 14:22:36)
  * discussion on working from the current draft vs. starting with a
    blank slate  (rpaik, 14:29:03)
  * proxy for Vodafone  (rpaik, 14:37:25)
  * covering for Rajesh Gadiyar (Intel)  (bjskerry_, 14:37:53)
  * VOTE: Voted on "Shall the TAC recommend to the Governing Board to
    delegate to the TAC and the underlying technical communities to
    create a draft of the Project Proposal Process, along with the
    Project Lifecycle and TAC-Project process.  The resulting
    document(s) would then be provided to the Governing Board for
    review, editing, and approval?" Results are, +1: 14  (phrobb,
    14:38:43)
  * discussion on using an existing repo if a new LFN repo can be
    created soon  (rpaik, 14:44:23)
  * if you're interested in joining the project lifecycle working group
    ping rpaik/phrobb  (rpaik, 14:46:15)

* TAC leadership roles  (rpaik, 14:50:53)
  * concerns about a single GB representative being able to represent
    all communities  (rpaik, 14:51:21)
  * phrobb notes that there is also a committer representative to the GB
    (rpaik, 14:59:48)
  * discussion to continue via mailing lists  (rpaik, 15:01:02)



Meeting ended at 15:01:25 UTC.



People present (lines said)
---------------------------

* rpaik (20)
* collabot` (8)
* dfarrell07 (6)
* phrobb (5)
* randybias (4)
* frankbrockners (3)
* JasonHunt (3)
* ttallgren (3)
* timirnich (2)
* bjskerry_ (2)
* afredette (2)
* edwarnicke_ (2)
* rossella_s (2)
* tykeal (1)
* jamil_ (1)
* pcarver (1)
* gilbert (1)
* Wenjing (1)



Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4