#lfn-meeting: LFN TAC bi-weekly

Meeting started by rpaik at 14:00:19 UTC (full logs).

Meeting summary

    1. edwarnicke (edwarnicke, 14:00:43)
    2. Wenjing Chu (Wenjing, 14:01:08)
    3. Tapio Tallgren (ttallgren, 14:01:55)
    4. Xiaojun Xie (Xiaojun, 14:02:00)
    5. Daniel Farrell (dfarrell07, 14:02:11)
    6. Frank Brockners, Cisco (frankbrockners, 14:02:44)

  2. agenda (kennypaul, 14:06:09)
    1. discuss budget first, and governance 2nd (kennypaul, 14:07:02)
    2. A concern was raised that not all projects have a clearly defined budget scope. (CaseyLF, 14:10:24)
    3. reminder that there is a commitment of July 11 for governance doc to the board. (kennypaul, 14:12:01)
    4. https://gerrit.linuxfoundation.org/infra/#/c/10545/ (rpaik, 14:12:59)
    5. Anders Rosengren (AndersR, 14:14:12)

  3. budget proposal review (kennypaul, 14:14:43)
    1. https://gerrit.linuxfoundation.org/infra/#/c/10545/ patch for the community budget process (rpaik, 14:15:38)
    2. discussion if TSC's need to get involved in managing the overall marketing budget (e.g. project specific PR, events, etc.) (rpaik, 14:21:02)
    3. suggestion to clarify what is meant by events/marketing in the document (rpaik, 14:25:39)
    4. ACTION: edwarnicke to clarify what events are covered by TSC discretionary budget and which are covered by shared LFN (dfarrell07, 14:25:52)
    5. https://linuxfoundation.na1.echosign.com/public/esignWidget?wid=CBFCIBAA3AAABLblqZhDm0hu8eD4U4lIapeykQZQD7lT2L8U8VaXaLpQP27TEsyCuTvPPTxzhJbb8KzmdhKo* form for Meetup Reimbursement. (CaseyLF, 14:33:48)
    6. For Meetups, after filling out the Reimbursement form, submit your receipts, and number of attendees to osnug@linuxfoundation.org (CaseyLF, 14:35:16)
    7. discussion that discretionary spends amount should be figured out prior to making recommendations to the GB (rpaik, 14:36:35)
    8. it seems like the biggest question about budget process how much lives in LFN and how much lives in TSCs (dfarrell07, 14:39:36)
    9. discussion that the budget process for LFN vs. project specific activities is unclear under LFN (rpaik, 14:46:04)
    10. we need to add clarity about how we're going to support non-TAC projects (dfarrell07, 14:50:35)
    11. dfarrell07 thinks we should refactor TF section now to be non-TAC section (dfarrell07, 14:50:52)
    12. dfarrell07 thinks we should be generous with support for non-TAC projects, especially for small events with low latency (dfarrell07, 14:51:14)
    13. randybias violently agrees with dfarrell07 that suporting the smaller non-TAC projects is important for supporting their efforts in maturing over time and becoming TAC projects. (randybias, 14:54:24)
    14. ACTION: randybias to refactor TF section into non-TAC section (dfarrell07, 14:55:47)
    15. ACTION: edwarnicke to clarify "TAC or MAC" in the document (rpaik, 14:56:35)
    16. encourage community members to review governance docs at https://gerrit.linuxfoundation.org/infra/#/c/11139/ (rpaik, 15:00:17)


Meeting ended at 15:01:56 UTC (full logs).

Action items

  1. edwarnicke to clarify what events are covered by TSC discretionary budget and which are covered by shared LFN
  2. randybias to refactor TF section into non-TAC section
  3. edwarnicke to clarify "TAC or MAC" in the document


Action items, by person

  1. edwarnicke
    1. edwarnicke to clarify what events are covered by TSC discretionary budget and which are covered by shared LFN
    2. edwarnicke to clarify "TAC or MAC" in the document
  2. randybias
    1. randybias to refactor TF section into non-TAC section


People present (lines said)

  1. rpaik (15)
  2. dfarrell07 (11)
  3. collabot_ (5)
  4. kennypaul (4)
  5. randybias (3)
  6. CaseyLF (3)
  7. edwarnicke (2)
  8. frankbrockners (1)
  9. AndersR (1)
  10. ttallgren (1)
  11. Xiaojun (1)
  12. Wenjing (1)


Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.