#opnfv-cperf: cperf

Meeting started by dfarrell07 at 18:14:44 UTC (full logs).

Meeting summary

    1. Jamo is on PTO this week (dfarrell07, 18:15:09)
    2. mgkwill is also on PTO, honeymoon, congrats! (dfarrell07, 18:19:22)
    3. discussion (kinda off-topic as we wait for ppl to join) about ODL S3P work, staffing, test owners, how many tests (dfarrell07, 18:21:29)
    4. Long discussion about taking part in C release or not (dfarrell07, 18:34:37)
    5. dfarrell07 has been in discussions with OPNFV release manager about CPerf status, currently "high" risk of missing C release (dfarrell07, 18:45:12)
    6. Main thing we need to do is update our JIRAs. We've been making good progress and taking good notes from meetings, but not moving any of that to JIRA for community. (dfarrell07, 18:45:45)
    7. Also need to decide if it's valuable to take part in OPNFV releases, vs taking part in OPNFV (CI, meetings, etc) without overhead around release (dfarrell07, 18:46:37)
    8. Al talks about VSPerf experience of taking part vs not in releases (dfarrell07, 18:46:57)
    9. VSPerf didn't take part in A, did in B because of some pressure on PTL, did see lots of overhead, maybe didn't find much value (dfarrell07, 18:47:24)
    10. Value in releases seems to come from integration/decisions around installers, what they will include, how they will lay down the base OPNFV deployments (dfarrell07, 18:48:00)
    11. Projects that float on top of installers, not really caring about those details, don't really need to coordinate via release (dfarrell07, 18:48:25)
    12. We plan on just having a master branch, and always running our latest code against deploys (dfarrell07, 18:48:56)
    13. There seems to be few projects in OPNFV who don't take part in releases. ODL had some stigma like this, around not taking part in SRs, but some major projects like Int/* have shown it to be good plan. (dfarrell07, 18:49:50)
    14. We also don't have many major deliverables ready for C. Hello World job may be done, and some small % chance NSTAT could be done, but both are stretch. Issues with CI immaturity def slowed us down. (dfarrell07, 18:51:33)
    15. Consensus here seems to be that taking part provides no value and adds work, so don't take part in C, maybe in D if we have useful tests and Yardstick integration. (dfarrell07, 18:53:20)
    16. ACTION: dfarrell07 to send email to relevant ppl/list about taking part in C release or not (dfarrell07, 18:53:29)
    17. Note that taking part in C is unrelated to need to keep JIRAs up-to-date, that's just being a good part of OPNFV community (dfarrell07, 18:53:59)
    18. ACTION: dfarrell07 to send email to relevant ppl/list about updating JIRAs (dfarrell07, 18:54:17)
    19. Nikos sent major update about NSTAT testing, including detailed results matrix. Seeing scale up to 4600 switches when split between 16 containers/VMs. More isolation seems to improve scale. (dfarrell07, 19:16:22)
    20. dfarrell07 has asked to copy+paste this initial data to textfile and upload to CPERF-2 JIRA (dfarrell07, 19:17:51)
    21. Nikos is on PTO too, well-earned after these efforts (dfarrell07, 19:18:11)
    22. Veryx work is making progress. They are reporting that they have their tool installed in our test tools Docker container. dfarrell07 to ask them to do in Dockerfile and push for review. (dfarrell07, 20:44:07)
    23. dfarrell07 and LuisGomez have meeting next week with Ray and LF person (lawyer?) about Veryx licensing. Yay :| (dfarrell07, 20:45:06)
    24. Al gave good feedback to Luis about his OF tests, metrics that matter. LuisGomez to review email and continue discussion. (dfarrell07, 20:46:09)
    25. dfarrell07 et al appreciate Al's valuable metrics feedback, think that collabration helps tons (dfarrell07, 20:46:51)
    26. LuisGomez has been working on clustering libs, moving to OF tests for S3P push soon (dfarrell07, 20:47:19)
    27. dfarrell07 has been digging into NetVirt CSIT, mgkwill's Docker Robot libs for NetVirt scale test (dfarrell07, 20:48:27)
    28. ACTION: dfarrell07 to update JIRAs, remind owners to do so as well (dfarrell07, 20:49:03)


Meeting ended at 20:49:18 UTC (full logs).

Action items

  1. dfarrell07 to send email to relevant ppl/list about taking part in C release or not
  2. dfarrell07 to send email to relevant ppl/list about updating JIRAs
  3. dfarrell07 to update JIRAs, remind owners to do so as well


Action items, by person

  1. dfarrell07
    1. dfarrell07 to send email to relevant ppl/list about taking part in C release or not
    2. dfarrell07 to send email to relevant ppl/list about updating JIRAs
    3. dfarrell07 to update JIRAs, remind owners to do so as well


People present (lines said)

  1. dfarrell07 (30)
  2. collabot (3)


Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.