#opnfv-dovetail: Dovetail weekly meeting

Meeting started by georgk at 14:02:01 UTC (full logs).

Meeting summary

  1. roll call (georgk, 14:02:10)
    1. Georg Kunz (georgk, 14:02:14)
    2. xudan (xudan, 14:02:25)
    3. Dimitris Tsiolakis (dimitris_, 14:04:10)

  2. status pre-testing activities (georgk, 14:07:46)
    1. pre-testing activities are ongoing and no additional issues have been identified right now (georgk, 14:09:16)
    2. SerenaFeng (SerenaFeng, 14:09:17)

  3. test case status (georgk, 14:09:37)
    1. bottleneck ssh issue: we need to update the releng script to check the scenario name and pass it to the dovetail CLI (georgk, 14:14:13)
    2. tempest custom test cases have started to fail in CI. (georgk, 14:17:29)
    3. ACTION: georgk to create a JIRA ticket to follow this up (georgk, 14:17:43)
    4. the most important blocking issue is the inconsistent execution of the OS interop tests in functest (georgk, 14:20:29)
    5. ACTION: georgk needs to highlight this to the functest team once more (georgk, 14:20:48)
    6. identity v2 is not supported by Functest anymore. It would be nice to get this covered, but it has a lower priority than DOVETAIL-662 (georgk, 14:29:07)
    7. ACTION: georgk needs to think about if an udate f the addendum is needed (georgk, 14:45:55)

  4. release candidate preparartion (georgk, 14:48:00)
    1. georgk proposes to create a stable branch stable/fraser now and tagging the repo with a release candidate tag of ovp-2.0.0-rc1 (georgk, 14:48:48)
    2. georgk will create a stable branch and start to tie our documentation into the OPNFV docs (georgk, 14:52:35)


Meeting ended at 14:53:29 UTC (full logs).

Action items

  1. georgk to create a JIRA ticket to follow this up
  2. georgk needs to highlight this to the functest team once more
  3. georgk needs to think about if an udate f the addendum is needed


Action items, by person

  1. georgk
    1. georgk to create a JIRA ticket to follow this up
    2. georgk needs to highlight this to the functest team once more
    3. georgk needs to think about if an udate f the addendum is needed


People present (lines said)

  1. georgk (17)
  2. collabot` (3)
  3. dimitris_ (1)
  4. SerenaFeng (1)
  5. xudan (1)


Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.