08:00:06 #startmeeting Functest weekly meeting 5/9 08:00:06 Meeting started Tue Sep 5 08:00:06 2017 UTC. The chair is morgan_orange. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 08:00:06 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 08:00:06 The meeting name has been set to 'functest_weekly_meeting_5_9' 08:00:19 #info Jose Lausuch 08:00:19 #info PTL is back....... 08:00:25 #topic call role 08:00:28 #chait jose_lausuch 08:00:33 #chair jose_lausuch 08:00:33 Current chairs: jose_lausuch morgan_orange 08:00:41 #info Morgan Richomme 08:00:41 #info Linda Wang 08:00:42 hi everyone :) 08:00:57 #info Juha Kosonen 08:00:57 jose_lausuch: Hello. :) 08:01:08 jose_lausuch: Hi 08:01:08 #info Debayan 08:01:11 #info Ilia Abashin 08:01:14 #info agenda for today https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/functest/Functest+5.+Meeting 08:01:16 #info Cristina Pauna (Enea) 08:01:31 any topic you want to add? 08:02:01 iabashin: is here for calipso, debayan for vEPC integration there are also parser contributors on the chan 08:02:24 #topic action points follow up 08:02:30 #info AP1: morgan_orange contact orchestra regarding orchestra_* test cases 08:02:34 shangxdy_: no it cannot work as you keep the same package name as Official package. It breaks the offical upper constraints. 08:02:39 #info done, regression introduced yesterday but should be fixed now 08:02:49 #info 1 successful reun for orchestra_clearwaterims on daisy 08:02:55 #info AP2: LindaWang revert from artifact to cirios web site (patch done yesterday to run CI despite cirrios web site weas no more answering) 08:02:59 #info done 08:03:06 #info discussions on image downlaod in next topic (avoid blocking due to open baton image on some pods 08:03:13 #info AP3 morgan_orange contact releng to see if we could not avoid cleaning downloaded images after each job (cache mechanism to save time on CI pipeline) 08:03:17 #info forgotten..not done.. 08:03:28 #info connected to wget discussion in next topics, i could reaction myself 08:03:35 #info AP4 ollivier patch set-functest-env.sh to indicate download failure issue 08:03:41 #info done but logs of the downlaod are very verbose.... 08:03:45 AP3 downloaded images? docker? 08:03:51 In case of openbaton it cannot work as we cannot check timestamps (see Linda report) 08:04:04 #info AP5 morgan_orange disable Promise, Domino, Doctor from reporting (focus on healtcheck and smoke...) 08:04:10 #info done: only healtcheck and smoke tests used in reporting pages 08:04:17 #info AP6: Shuya_ool remove dependency on fuel in testcases.yaml to try to run the testcase with all the installers 08:04:23 #info done first CI runs on vyos_vrouter 08:04:28 #info AP7: Debayan put the code for review on OPNFV repo 08:04:35 #info discussion in progress, should be done this week 08:04:40 debayan: you want to add somethign? 08:04:57 This is ongoing; and we are waiting for an invitation from OPNFV helpdesk to proceed further ... 08:05:38 ah ok invitation still not sent...I hope it will be faster than the violations plugin in jenkins...jira created 5 weeks ago.. 08:05:45 Otherwise what you mentioned is fine Morgan .... 08:05:55 #info juju_epc team waiting for LF invitation to push code 08:05:58 shangxdy_: you must consider changing package name as you forked. The root name should be changed as well. 08:06:05 #info AP8: ollivier shangxdy clarify Parser requirement for functest by mail 08:06:18 as you can see...discussion in progress 08:06:21 I planned a dedicated slot 08:06:27 #info discussion in progress, see dedicated section 08:06:32 #info AP9: morgan_orange prepare list of students/ internships 08:06:42 #info done see topic internship 08:06:50 any comment on the action points? 08:06:58 yes 08:07:06 morgan_orange: The dir holding downloaded images in CI Pods was not cleaned actually. 08:07:07 AP3 refers to docker images? 08:07:25 no to the images we download for the tests 08:07:32 ok 08:07:41 I thought they were not cleaned 08:07:52 #topic Euphrates Status 08:08:17 It's inappropriate to change the root package, it will change too much. 08:08:35 maybe let's start with the downloading point 08:08:40 ok 08:08:58 #info image download: we now do a wget with all the needed images for the tests 08:09:13 quite simple. We cannot check timestamps in case of one image. Then it will be downloaded for any releng job. 08:09:19 #info as it is done in the prepare env, it means that we download openbaton images even for healthcheck 08:09:46 #info it is another argument to move to alpine...where we could download the images according to the tier/tests we are doing 08:09:48 Yes. We must rewrite jjobs... 08:10:16 ollivier, we continue to disccusse through email 08:10:43 so, the idea is to download the images depending on the scenario, right? 08:10:45 shangxdy_: I planned a section for parter - at least to share the view with other contriutors 08:11:51 I will provide all the possible list of links. But I think this is not the key action points. 08:12:05 if it depends on the scenario, how to deal with the situation: most CI jobs about compass patch verification will definitely be blocked because of timeout. 08:12:27 in compass patch verification job, only healtheck and vping are run 08:12:32 I do think we should remove the image and disable the 2 testcases. 08:12:59 (timestamps cannot be checked.) 08:13:05 what is the solution then? 08:13:11 if it is blocking a gate, It is also my view. Orchestra team did not reply to LindaWang 08:13:33 so for short term to avoid wasting CI time => disable the 2 test cases at least on compass (seems OK on apex) 08:13:41 Yes the tests done by Linda are much more important. 08:13:47 for mid term find a way to download the images according to the tier 08:13:50 Maybe it is better for them to fix the image with time-stamps turning on or something like this to keep this image unchanged. 08:14:06 hence my proposal to move the gating to alpines and work on a txt file per tier 08:14:08 Let me disable them. 08:14:20 #agree 08:14:38 txt file per tier containing what exactly? 08:15:01 the list of images needed by the tier 08:15:12 the image is used by orchestra_openims and rchestra_clearwaterims? 08:15:16 ok 08:15:29 can't that be included in testcases.yaml? 08:15:35 jose_lausuch: https://git.opnfv.org/functest/tree/functest/ci/download_images.sh is used whatever we are testing 08:15:37 we have testcases.yaml for each alpine container, right? 08:15:44 yes 08:16:16 oh, this file has changed quite a lot 08:16:24 we had some if-else conditions before 08:16:29 lots of things changed .. :) 08:16:39 anyway, the way you are saying sounds good 08:16:40 Aha :) 08:17:08 do we agree to switch our CI gating to alpine rather than our traditional Ubuntu (except for aarch64)? 08:17:35 from opnfv dockerhub? 08:18:08 from CI instead of pulling opnfv/functest we pull opnfv/functest-healtcheck / smoke / features and vnf 08:18:36 so, this one for gating https://hub.docker.com/r/opnfv/functest-healthcheck/ 08:18:37 morgan_orange: do you plan to do this for E1? 08:18:48 But Functest RestApi has not be ready for alpine based image. morgan_orange 08:19:27 ok so no rush... 08:19:53 short term => openbaton test constarint => only with apex (no download issue) until they fixed their timestamp issue 08:20:16 #action morgan_orange restrict orchestra test to apex (to avoid blocking compass gate) 08:20:19 Yezs we should swith to alpine 08:20:37 When? 08:20:53 #info switch to Alpine gating to be considered. Evaluate the impacts - what is missing (functest API / consequence for aarch6', ..) 08:21:55 we can continue offline, the decission is important but in line with xci evolution and slicing demand...we are closed to the release but it is a CI question, the code is ready anyway 08:22:00 #topic calipso 08:22:30 iabashin: can you summarize for Functest contributors what calipso is doing, what are the etsts and what are your plans for E 08:22:36 Hi everyone 08:22:36 yes it's huge effort ot cobntinue maintaining the former Dockerfile 08:23:24 #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/vina/Calipso+Project+Proposal 08:23:29 Cedric Ollivier proposed functest: Stop downloading openbaton image. https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/41051 08:23:57 iabashin: can you summarize for us.. :) 08:24:16 Let me try.. 08:25:31 Calipso is a standalone project in opnfv, we provide insights on network topologies (currently using OpenStack data) and in general are independent of other opnfv projects 08:26:03 We use docker containers to run our microservices and are currently working on integration with apex 08:26:35 iabashin: so your docker will be installed as part of an apex scenario, right? 08:26:46 Also we need to integrate with (I guess not into, but "with") functest in order to comply with Euphrates requirements 08:27:26 Yes, we do have a scenario in mind, I don't think it's approved into apex master yet though 08:28:02 it should be - all the scenarios are supposed to be frozen from several weeks but anyway..that is joy of integration :) 08:28:20 morgan_orange: Koren knows more about the current status (see email) 08:28:26 so y view (correct me if I am wrong): we have a system preinstalled Apex + calipso extension 08:28:47 and you would like to perform basic tests (today just check that the dockers are here) 08:28:49 Yeah, we're still integrating as it has been going very slowly due to lack of our experience with opnfv integration 08:28:57 Yes, correct 08:29:07 iabashin: so, you basically run your stuff from your containers? 08:29:09 it could be done through a simple bash scripts but in the future you want to add more tests and you started writting so python code 08:29:24 But we also want to keep it generic (create a python test suite) for future testing 08:29:37 agree morgan_orange 08:29:38 you expect Functest to run your tests for your future scenario on apex 08:30:13 jose_lausuch: I'm not sure what you refer to... We deploy our containers on a host and run our code in containers, right 08:30:55 #link https://git.opnfv.org/calipso/tree/calipso/tests/functest/smoke_test.py 08:31:01 ok, is the code available 08:31:02 ah ok 08:31:03 thanks 08:31:29 morgan_orange: yes, and we'd prefer to do just one change to the testcases.yaml in functest and keep growing testbase without affecting the testcases.yaml 08:31:35 the code is stand alone..and as said it could have been done in a simple bash script. It seems that there is no requirements towards openStack or any uostream (just sys library) 08:32:43 morgan_orange: so far no. But what if there will be more specific tests in the future? We don't support just any OpenStack distribution 08:32:54 And, for exmaple, we require python >= 3.5 08:33:49 for the tests? 08:34:27 Say we've created a simple python test suite (that just runs smoke_test.py for now) and want to add it to testcases.yaml. What do I need to know more to make it happen? 08:34:52 For the project and preferably for the tests (to exclude possible issues in the future) 08:35:50 when I have a look at the code, I am a bit puzzled, you run command docker ps to list if calipso docker are there. But if you do that from functest docker (on the jumphost) it will not really make sense 08:36:34 Hm, I'll relay that to the author of the test, thanks. 08:36:35 or you must do it over tcp what a huge security issue regarding Docker API 08:37:16 functest runs on a docker file on the jumphost and consider the SUT as a "black box" 08:38:24 morgan_orange: Not really. it can still check if calipso docker are there even though " docker ps" is executed in the functest container. 08:39:02 in that case docker client needs to be installed in functest container 08:39:04 LindaWang: even if calispo dockers are on node and not on jumphost? 08:39:16 you can only doing that over tcp. But docker doesn't use credentials in this case. Then anyone can stop or remove containers. 08:39:23 calispo dockers should be on jumphosts 08:39:24 I remember docker provide APIs 08:39:39 yes, Docker API makes it easy. 08:39:44 iabashin: where do you install calipso dockers? 08:39:48 that's why docker uses an unix socket... 08:40:16 I definitely recall us using jumphost 08:40:32 iabashin: ok so it shall be possible 08:40:44 we need to continue offline to address other topics 08:40:50 I'm not really a devops guy in our team so I am not a reliable source of info on that point 08:40:57 #info calipso docker run on jumphost 08:41:10 #info calipso testing today = check that calipso docker are there 08:41:26 #info python script created for more evolutive testing in the future 08:41:45 iabashin: what do the containers do? what command do they run? 08:41:53 #info needs to get more info on apex scenario dealing with calipso 08:42:15 #action iabashin give details on the sceanrio planned for calipso 08:42:27 sorry we need to move 08:42:28 iabashin, I think, where to install calipso is not that important, as long as it can access to OpenStack, am I right? 08:42:39 #topic Parser 08:43:11 jose_lausuch: we have several that run services like mongo, sensu, etc and some running our project scripts 08:43:36 morgan_orange: so we continue on email? 08:43:40 so multiple containers? 08:43:55 iabashin: yes 08:43:55 yes 08:43:59 serena-zte: yes and yes 08:44:06 shangxdy_: can you give a status 08:44:53 as far as I understand parser is not really following usual rules => Euphrates was supposed to be aligned with ocata but you are using pike 08:45:07 morgan_orange: parser has been disccussed 08:45:29 you must also note it also forks OpenStack projects which adds difficulties 08:46:37 (fork in a bad way, as it only changes info in setup.cfg instead changing egg name, namespaces...) 08:47:05 ollivier: i just repled your email, please check it. 08:47:16 is it reasonable to onboard it for E at this stage? what is the tradeoff sigularity/complexity to integrate for us? 08:48:19 #info integration still not clear: not aligned with Release management rules (Ocata based for OpenStack), fork. 08:48:39 ok let's continue also this thread by mail 08:48:47 maybe that should be brought to release meeting? 08:48:59 For us? a dedicated container for Alpine, tweak OpenSTack upper constraints and create a venv in the Ubuntu one. 08:49:22 ollivier: we already concern that it doesn't work only change the setup.cfg 08:49:23 that sounds a hassle at this stage… 08:49:42 another argument for alpine => possibility to isolate "singular " cases to onboard... :) 08:50:00 TYes but if we don't swithc to Alpine it's time to stop rushing isn't it? 08:50:15 morgan_orange: parser will follow the releae rules in release E, as what i said in email to ollivier 08:51:03 jose_lausuch: there were 5 persons in the last release meeting... 08:51:04 It won't be enough to syunc the requirements. We must tweak OpenSTack's constraints too which oblige to use the offical versions. 08:51:26 #topic Euphrates CI 08:51:28 If you can sync them to stable/ocata, it's already a huge task. 08:51:37 #info mail sent yesterday to give an overview of the status 08:51:52 one of the main problem is today the regression introduced by the cleaning mechanism on tempest/refstack 08:52:15 juhak: could you have a look at that. I think Martin is not there anymore 08:52:39 I'll take a look 08:52:47 whenc cleaning fails => tempest is not executed => it affects lots of scenarios but..it seems hard to predict... 08:53:06 #action juhak look at the cleaning issue on Tempest/Refstack issue 08:53:42 #info do not hesitate to react on the mail on the different status 08:53:46 it only works on fuel whatever the scenario is ha or noha. 08:54:12 there are still lots of troubleshooting especially with feature projects... 08:54:27 #topic Internships: what's next 08:54:39 #info several students contact us recently 08:54:44 #info 4 topics 08:54:48 #info 1) Security groups test case in Functest 08:54:54 #info 10/8 Yolande Amate 08:54:57 #info 22/8 jayadityagupta11 AT gmail.com 08:55:01 #info 25/8 sauravmalani1 AT gmail.com 08:55:04 #info 31/8 janvi.palan AT gmail.com 08:55:08 #info 2) Web Portal for OPNFV Test AP 08:55:11 #info 9/8 rutuja.r.surve AT gmail.com 08:55:14 #info 18/8 anurag30671371 AT gmail.com 08:55:18 #info 3) VNF catalog 08:55:21 #info 24/8 Manoj Nirania 08:55:25 #info 4) Kubernetes testing 08:55:28 #info 2/8 konraddjimeli AT gmail.com 08:55:33 #info how do we proceed? enough mentors for the internships? topics still aligned with our needs?... 08:55:37 we shall at east answer 08:55:47 Serena is managing the one dealing with test api 08:55:57 but we need to answer to the others 08:56:03 jose_lausuch: can i action you on that? 08:56:20 I will interview Konrad this week 08:56:51 yes, I asked them to submit 3 patches before the interview :) 08:56:56 I don't have the original emails 08:57:00 I think one is almost there 08:57:20 independently from the interview, we should check if we have the resources (enough mentors) if the topics are still in line with our expectiations and we shall answer to them... 08:57:35 serena-zte: patch selection... 08:57:43 I will never have been recruited :) 08:57:50 segarding security groups 08:58:00 do we have a clear picture of what that means? 08:58:13 because I am not very familiar with front-end, so I need some talent guy 08:58:15 :) 08:58:38 jose_lausuch: yes I think David_Orange wrote everything in a web pages...it is a bit old but as far as I know such testing still does not exist... 08:59:12 no, it doesn't 08:59:19 maybe the task can be to investigate what's missing 08:59:23 and implement it 08:59:26 #action jose_lausuch review the different internship requests / send mail to functest team / prepare answers to the students 08:59:46 we can help of course but if you could centralize it will be cool 08:59:52 can you forward me the emails? 09:00:03 #action morgan_orange forward the different emails 09:00:08 #topic AoB 09:00:12 any topic you want to raise 09:00:39 the branching window is open...we did not discuss when we want to branch - usually we do that at the end of the window (end of September) 09:00:59 yes, let´s wait 09:01:02 Too much work required. We should wait 09:01:09 to not start cherry pick too much 09:01:37 #info not time for branching (too much work for integration) 09:02:00 #info Cedric sent a mail to Release Manager to educate on requirements/dependencies...which asked him to write a powerpoint (keep cool :) ) for technical meeting then TSC 09:02:26 Maybe i should do the same for switching to Alpine 09:02:28 #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/functest/Requirements+management 09:03:17 ollivier: I do not see major obstacles for the switch... LindaWang how do you see that / the internal API? 09:03:41 Yes. I know the gap between them the price to maintain both 09:04:24 anyway with aarch64 we will still have 2 to maintain, no? 09:04:59 CristinaPauna: you think you could investigate the topic in armband? 09:05:48 ok we are already 5 minutes late 09:06:07 it was my last interim chair..next week jose_lausuch will have read all his summer emails.. :) 09:06:15 any other topic you want to raise? 09:06:21 hopefully :) 09:06:23 any candidate for the TSC at large 09:06:28 thanks for taking care morgan_orange 09:06:42 I will not candidate 09:06:50 not any more? 09:07:06 let's discuss offline 09:07:12 and end meeting 09:07:12 we should renew and give a chance to young people.. :) 09:07:25 ok thanks for joing still lots of pending topics 09:07:29 #endmeeting