08:00:44 #startmeeting Functest weekly meeting 20 Mar. 2018 08:00:44 Meeting started Tue Mar 20 08:00:44 2018 UTC. The chair is ollivier. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 08:00:44 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 08:00:44 The meeting name has been set to 'functest_weekly_meeting_20_mar__2018' 08:00:52 #info Cédric Ollivier 08:01:01 #info Linda Wang 08:01:13 #info Juha Kosonen 08:01:26 #info Jose Lausuch 08:01:43 #info Delia Popescu 08:03:11 #topic Action point follow-up 08:03:22 #info neutron-trunk was merged 08:03:54 I have seen it worked vs Apex but I have to check all the results. 08:04:15 compass? 08:04:29 still several subtests in failure? 08:04:41 i have not checked that 08:05:21 #link http://artifacts.opnfv.org/logs/functest/lf-pod1/2018-03-19_20-37-21/neutron_trunk/tempest-report.html 08:05:40 ok. I think it's done. 08:05:42 because no logs are pushed to artifacts because of timeout on compass nosdn-nofeature 08:05:49 #link https://jira.opnfv.org/browse/FUNCTEST-950 08:06:01 #info Patrole testcase is finished and runs well (it were moved into smoke) 08:06:13 #link http://artifacts.opnfv.org/logs/functest/lf-pod2/2018-03-10_02-11-14/patrole/tempest-report.html 08:06:21 #link http://artifacts.opnfv.org/logs/functest/lf-pod1/2018-03-10_04-20-36/patrole/tempest-report.html 08:06:37 #info Functest job timeout was increased (temporarily solution due to Compass and Fuel Arm) 08:06:56 it seems a second patch is needed: https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/53877/ 08:07:40 depo: I have seen any run for a while. Did a job raise timeout since the first patch was merged? 08:08:27 depo: last run was 10 days ago 08:08:49 it still timeout on compass: https://build.opnfv.org/ci/view/functest/job/functest-compass-baremetal-daily-master/16/ 08:09:17 shall I merge? 08:09:34 we could. But it should be considered as a bug. 08:09:56 If we compare duration between apex, daisy and arm, compass 08:11:01 merged, we can go back to previous timeout when finding the reason 08:11:16 jose_lausuch: thank you 08:11:21 np 08:11:39 #info a new wiki page has been written to explain how to run the new Kubernetes testcases 08:11:47 #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=20742412 08:12:12 #info opnfv/xtesting is now built for both architectures: amd64 and arm64 08:12:24 #info Functest leverages on Xtesting 0.31 08:12:36 #info lots of logs have been redirected to functest.log (tempest-based testcases, vnfs...) 08:12:43 Thank you al for that actions 08:14:08 Any question? Else I start to Functest topic. 08:14:24 about the timeout, we do not know how long it takes before running functest testcases. The job takes more than 6 hours 08:15:22 The duration is much more shorter in our local POD and when testign Apex, Daisy... 08:16:00 It could be induced by bandwith but all testcases take more time. 08:16:10 ok, i will ask Compass team to figure that out. 08:16:45 I could understand when testing different architectures. 08:17:14 Then out of vnf (download), all durations should be pretty equal. 08:17:54 less than 4 hours for Daisy. 08:18:13 ollivier: yes, we reached another timeout, after 360, my last timeout patch was not merged 08:18:36 ollivier: but we had functest run on POD6 08:18:42 depo: It's merged now. 08:18:55 ollivier: thank you 08:19:13 depo: > Jose 08:19:29 #topic Functest 08:19:57 #info vyos_vrouter's descriptor has been updated (the testcase works locally) 08:20:25 The testcase now supports Keystone v3 (non default domain names) 08:20:45 #link https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/54127/ 08:21:05 cloudify_ims live test failed, the results should not be PASS. 08:21:09 Could you please review https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/54131/ ? 08:21:22 it seems as dns issue. 08:21:39 Let's see. There are 2 bugs in the testcase. 08:21:45 Merged functest: Remove unused code in vyos_vrouter https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/54131 08:21:53 thank you 08:22:28 Several runs may fail till the containers are being built. 08:22:31 #link https://build.opnfv.org/ci/job/functest-daisy-baremetal-daily-master/12/console 08:23:03 Simply because of conflicts between the third party repository and gerrit 08:23:15 Now it should work 08:24:28 About cloudify_ims, there are 2 bugs. The possible issue in DNS is not a big deal (a minor change has been applied to it). 08:25:11 But it seems that the testcase is passed even if tests fail. That's a bigger one which may have hidden log time issues. Let's see. 08:25:21 any update about the blueprint? 08:25:23 (remember vping the last release) 08:25:47 I don't think so. I will check that right after the meeting if you could stay onlien. 08:25:59 ollivier: thanks 08:26:20 #info Functest should fully support keystone v3 but last Joid runs were not so great. 08:26:32 #link https://build.opnfv.org/ci/view/functest/job/functest-joid-baremetal-daily-master/45/console 08:26:53 badly Narinder haven't install gsutil on his POD then we lost all debugs 08:27:23 But I think that our development for this release are done. 08:28:44 maybe an update for JOID https://jira.opnfv.org/browse/JOID-124 and a quick fix in cloudify_ims 08:29:10 Then thank you all. I think we could ask for the stable branch quite soon. Agree? 08:30:13 We may integrate a new Feature testcase but it's quite out of Functest https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/53957/ 08:31:25 There is still one improvment when testing ims. https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/53715/ . But we will easily cherry-pick it if needed. 08:31:50 Agree? 08:32:02 yes, agree. 08:32:41 Great work. 08:32:47 stor4nfv tests expects to be included in functest-kubernetes. 08:33:06 Then the functest change may be abandonned? 08:33:14 yes 08:33:18 ok 08:34:13 our document is to be updated too. 08:34:37 yes next topic 08:35:20 Could you please review https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/54137 ? It works locally 08:35:34 And this trivial one https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/54135 08:36:30 Then we do focus on our documentation to finish the release. 08:36:44 #info devguide or apidoc 08:36:55 #link https://jira.opnfv.org/browse/FUNCTEST-923 08:37:05 #link https://jira.opnfv.org/browse/FUNCTEST-938 08:37:22 I think testcases could be described in python modules as well. 08:38:10 #link http://functest.readthedocs.io/en/latest/apidoc/functest.opnfv_tests.sdn.odl.odl.html 08:38:13 Merged functest: Fix apidoc builds https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/54135 08:38:59 Merged functest: Put TestResults.json in the right dir https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/54137 08:39:10 Even if it's quite duplicated at the beginning it would be simpler to manage description in the right module instead of an external doc. 08:40:57 #info configguide 08:41:06 #link https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/54069/ 08:41:16 patrole section in wiki could be moved to configguide too 08:41:29 #info userguide 08:41:39 #link https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/54107/ 08:42:07 Be free to help updating docs. I think configguide is already quite updated. 08:43:01 sure. i will help remove refstack-client part 08:43:05 The bigger part is about functest-kubernetes. 08:43:13 Thank you 08:43:22 it is Konrad's todo list 08:43:31 #action all update the documentation 08:43:55 #topic functest-kubernetes 08:44:05 we do wait the next CI runs to get the logs at the ends 08:44:13 #link https://build.opnfv.org/ci/view/functest/job/functest-compass-virtual-daily-master/69/console 08:44:14 #link https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/54085/ 08:44:29 logs have been uploaded now 08:44:50 Skipped: 651 ? 08:45:11 actually only one test is included in k8s_smoke 08:45:26 ok 08:46:05 #info one patch vs Joid is being reviewed 08:46:15 #link https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/54093/ 08:46:37 do we need to remove KUBECONFIG in this patch? 08:46:43 #info we should still stop setting KUBECONFIG in env (mismatch between host and container envs). 08:47:14 I would propose to first etablish the process and then we can easily improve it 08:47:58 I would propose a second change as soon as we get our first 'PASS' results. 08:48:11 The change is quite trivial. 08:48:32 #link https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/53815/ 08:49:17 I would prefer to first update K8s to 1.9.4 08:49:31 #link https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/54095/ (need to be updated) 08:49:39 will update it soon 08:50:21 I think we should target the last release even if compass is behind. It's like Openstack (API) 08:50:37 compass is v1.9.1 08:50:56 ok. Then no doubt about 1.9.4 :) 08:51:14 It should be a requirement from Release management as OpenStack. 08:52:17 Done: https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/54095/ 08:52:21 will check that. 08:53:56 #topic AoB 08:54:07 I will be moving to LA in the next days. 08:54:51 see you there 08:54:51 Have a pleasant journey! 08:54:58 It's quite unclear now as I'm modifying my tickets. 08:55:26 I will prepare slides for G-release proposals. Then we could discuss Moday afternoon. 08:56:12 have a nice trip! 08:56:13 Do we initiate a kubernetes session ? I think a breakout seems enough? 08:56:27 thank you. 08:56:57 jose_lausuch: depo: I will publish my slides on gerrit and we could have further discussions after my trip if needed. 08:56:58 I hope you guys and Konrad would have a session. Still some issues to be solved 08:57:12 ollivier: ok 08:57:13 I will not go there, eitehr 08:57:30 ok. I thought you would be there. 08:57:51 Face 2 face meeting with Juha:) 08:57:51 i thought so. 08:58:11 cool 08:58:40 I think Serena would be there too. 08:59:03 Have you asked a plenary session for Konrad? 08:59:19 i have asked Konrad to prepare a presentation. 08:59:32 no 09:00:10 Ok. I think the best choice is to organize a meeting between us. I will open the breakout session to other OPNFV members as well. 09:00:24 i hope you could have an informal meeting, where you could discuss 09:00:34 yes, that is it. 09:00:49 Sure. on Monday afternoon if it's free. 09:01:00 and if he is there. 09:01:26 then we are on time. Thank you all this great week again. we are close to a new Great release. 09:01:41 gating is already good. 09:01:46 #endmeeting