08:01:06 <ollivier1> #startmeeting Functest weekly meeting 3 July. 2018
08:01:06 <collabot`> Meeting started Tue Jul  3 08:01:06 2018 UTC.  The chair is ollivier1. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
08:01:06 <collabot`> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic.
08:01:06 <collabot`> The meeting name has been set to 'functest_weekly_meeting_3_july__2018'
08:01:20 <ollivier1> #info Cédric Ollivier
08:01:30 <juhak> #info Juha Kosonen
08:01:41 <viktor_t> #info Viktor Tikkanen
08:02:23 <ollivier1> #topic Action point follow-up
08:03:16 <ollivier1> I created one JIRA ticket per action discussed during last weekly meetings
08:03:22 <ollivier1> #link https://jira.opnfv.org/browse/FUNCTEST-977
08:03:28 <ollivier1> #link https://jira.opnfv.org/browse/FUNCTEST-986
08:03:34 <ollivier1> #link https://jira.opnfv.org/browse/FUNCTEST-987
08:03:40 <ollivier1> #link https://jira.opnfv.org/browse/FUNCTEST-988
08:03:46 <ollivier1> #link https://jira.opnfv.org/browse/FUNCTEST-989
08:04:06 <ollivier1> Nothing new. Be free to assign them to yourselves.
08:04:34 <ollivier1> the last 3 tickets are about our tempest testcase.
08:05:19 <depo> #info Delia Popescu
08:05:32 <ollivier1> Hell Delia
08:05:41 <depo> Hello
08:06:08 <ollivier1> #topic Functest Fraser
08:06:19 <ollivier1> #info vping is buggy if vlan: should we backport scenarios or simply fix the issue?
08:06:27 <ollivier1> we could bypass the by using floating ip address but other fixes are included (dpdk, etc.)
08:06:34 <ollivier1> #link https://jira.opnfv.org/browse/FUNCTEST-970
08:06:39 <ollivier1> #link https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tech-discuss/topic/functest_the_vping_test/22674506?p=,,,20,0,0,0::recentpostdate%2Fsticky,,,20,2,0,22674506
08:07:03 <ollivier1> I would suggest to backport without creating any new testcase. Do you agree?
08:07:42 <juhak> that's fine for me
08:08:27 <depo> fine from me
08:08:35 <viktor_t> ok
08:08:49 <ollivier1> Thank you. I will backport all the changes this afternoon.
08:09:05 <ollivier1> #info SNAPS flavor management was backported
08:09:16 <ollivier1> #topic Functest Gambia
08:09:25 <ollivier1> #info TSC asked to disable all new testcases to ease passing MS3.1
08:09:44 <ollivier1> We do revert https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/59041/ as MS3.1 is passed
08:09:58 <ollivier1> they are working well vs Joid https://build.opnfv.org/ci/view/functest/job/functest-joid-baremetal-daily-master/519/console
08:10:19 <ollivier1> #info XCI can't pass connection_check due to a bad configuration of its self-signed certificate.
08:10:28 <ollivier1> #info Fuel could have passed the testcases before MS3.1 if gating occurs continuously
08:10:41 <ollivier1> #info Compass shoud work as we create Member in all cases
08:10:56 <ollivier1> (Compass only creates _member_)
08:11:07 <ollivier1> #link https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/59407/
08:11:53 <ollivier1> Then we do you agree to enable them again?
08:13:00 <depo> was this discussed in the technical meeting?:)
08:13:40 <ollivier1> The point about the technical meeting is to highligh what we have done.
08:13:46 <ollivier1> (scenarios)
08:14:03 <depo> ok
08:15:08 <depo> I don't know which would be the best approach
08:15:14 <ollivier1> I don't understand the whole point from a technical point of view. Orange in OPNFV has raised concern about the whole process. More as XCI is not able to pass connection_check. Fuel should be fine.
08:15:32 <ollivier1> Regarding TSC, the issue was the milestone.
08:15:59 <depo> ok then :)
08:16:21 <ollivier1> Does Fuel verify all patches via Healthcheck?
08:16:46 <depo> yes, on a virtual deploy
08:17:34 <ollivier1> Have you checked the last results? You could simply switch INSTALLER_TYPE to enable the testcases.
08:18:32 <depo> I think so, yes
08:18:42 <ollivier1> I would propose to enable them again. We should be free to so. I can send an email to Tim and David.
08:18:53 <depo> agree
08:19:31 <ollivier1> I will revert the change right after the meeting.
08:19:58 <ollivier1> #info shaker arm64 image is now shared
08:20:27 <ollivier1> It seems not working on Fuel amd64. I'm not sure it already works on arm64. Delia?
08:20:53 <depo> no, is not
08:21:21 <ollivier1> I will have a look as soon as a public run is done. It's not a big deal from the time being
08:21:30 <depo> yes
08:21:55 <ollivier1> #info we may remove all data related to LXD (Joid is stopped). See testcases.yaml
08:22:46 <ollivier1> Do you agree? I'm not sure it's working and we shouldn't maintain unverified scenarios.
08:23:10 <depo> agree
08:23:50 <juhak> are there any reference about Joid being stopped?
08:24:53 <ollivier1> From the time being, the CI jobs are still running but Narinder sent an email. I was part of a release meeting in which it has been discussed.
08:25:21 <ollivier1> I can broadcast the question to Tim and David.
08:25:28 <juhak> ok, thanks
08:26:21 <ollivier1> My point is about all dependencies in testcases.yaml + the patch updating configs on-the-fly.
08:26:45 <ollivier1> #info Xtesting and Functest could leverage on stevedore
08:27:02 <ollivier1> It's just on open topic as previously introduced in LA
08:27:18 <ollivier1> to get the best default values regarding OpenStack or Kubernetes
08:27:24 <ollivier1> to apply additional rules when creating users (RBAC Contrail)
08:27:30 <ollivier1> to run testcases?
08:27:36 <ollivier1> to allow publishing results in other DB?
08:28:39 <ollivier1> Only the first point has to be adressed right now. Maybe there are alternatives.
08:29:12 <ollivier1> (we are forcing endusers to set the K8s scenarios as the default value is about OpenStack)
08:30:28 <ollivier1> #info it would be great to deploy IMS via Heat too
08:30:38 <ollivier1> #link https://github.com/Metaswitch/clearwater-heat
08:31:05 <ollivier1> It may add values to OpenStack and could run in their gates (third-party)
08:31:36 <ollivier1> I'm not convinced that we could run Cloudify out of OpenStack releases.
08:32:39 <ollivier1> The point is to keep the same testing process but allocates all IMS vIMS via HEAT. And later via ONAP (we are working on it in ONAP)
08:32:53 <ollivier1> ...all IMS Vms...
08:33:55 <ollivier1> Maybe juju_epc and vyos_vrouter teams would be interested as well.
08:34:25 <ollivier1> That's all from my side. Do you want to bring other topics for Gambia?
08:34:51 <depo> nope, not from me
08:35:29 <juhak> not from me either
08:36:44 <ollivier1> ok then let's close the meeting. I'm publishing the changes discussed. Thank you. Have a nice week :)
08:36:48 <ollivier1> #endmeeting