15:59:54 <frankbrockners> #startmeeting BGS daily release readiness synch
15:59:54 <collabot> Meeting started Thu Apr 23 15:59:54 2015 UTC.  The chair is frankbrockners. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:59:54 <collabot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic.
15:59:54 <collabot> The meeting name has been set to 'bgs_daily_release_readiness_synch'
16:00:01 <frankbrockners> #info Frank Brockners
16:01:32 <morgan_orange> #info morgan
16:01:40 * frankbrockners anyone around? feeling lonely
16:01:47 * frankbrockners hey morgan
16:02:09 <ManuelR_Sandvine> #info Manuel
16:02:14 <trozet> #info Tim Rozet
16:02:33 <pbandzi> #info pbandzi
16:02:55 <HKirksey> #info Heather Kirksey
16:04:10 <ChrisPriceAB> #info Chris Price (late as usual :)
16:04:33 <dneary> Here but about to leave for a meeting
16:04:47 <frankbrockners> #info topics are as usual: check where we are - and reflect latest status on https://wiki.opnfv.org/releases/arno/releasereadiness
16:04:49 <dneary> trozet and radez_g0n3 are the people who count
16:05:11 <trozet> radez's bot is in the meeting again!
16:05:19 <trozet> (radez on PTO today)
16:05:40 <ChrisPriceAB> lucky bugger...
16:05:45 <trevor_intel> #info Trevor Cooper
16:05:50 <frankbrockners> #info special attention needs to go to the "target system state topic" https://wiki.opnfv.org/get_started/get_started_system_state
16:05:57 * ChrisPriceAB that's aussie bugger by the way which is a good thing ;)
16:06:04 <frankbrockners> #info Let's start with system state
16:06:31 <frankbrockners> #info Functest needs some answers - so that they can decide whether certain tests are feasible
16:06:43 * ChrisPriceAB I will do my best to report on the fuel dev status, but will follow the foreman status lead :)
16:07:15 <frankbrockners> #info several entries on ostack are "not confirmed" - anyone have updates on whether we will have them available?
16:07:47 <frankbrockners> Tim, Chris?
16:07:53 <morgan_orange> my understanding is that both installers (fuel and foreman) provide Heat (even if the status is not clear)
16:08:08 <ChrisPriceAB> #info what's an ostack entry referring to?  ah ok
16:08:11 <morgan_orange> #info heat used for vIMS
16:08:11 <trozet> Frank, you want me to update that page today?
16:08:24 <frankbrockners> questions are on Horizon, Heat, Ceilometer
16:08:42 <frankbrockners> trozet: yes - you'd do Morgan a big favor
16:08:49 <trozet> #info Foreman installs Horizon, but not Heat or Ceilometer
16:09:15 <trozet> #info Shouldn't be too bad to enable them if needed, just need time to make changes and test that its working
16:09:30 <trozet> #info do we agree that those 2 are both needed, or just Heat?
16:09:55 <morgan_orange> #need confirmation of metaswitch but according to their page horizon and heat are needed
16:10:06 <ChrisPriceAB> #info do we have new requirements coming in days from release?
16:10:27 <morgan_orange> no need for ceilometer
16:10:39 <ChrisPriceAB> #info aside form some consternation about that, the fuel deploy comes with heat
16:10:50 <frankbrockners> #info looks like to me ... - IMHO we should stay with what we have for now. If we have sparetime - we can revisit new components. Thoughts?
16:11:08 <morgan_orange> #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/vims_functional_testing
16:11:09 <ChrisPriceAB> #info ack
16:11:23 <trozet> #info Agree.  After LF hardware is working, then I can focus on adding Heat for Foreman Installer
16:11:39 <trozet> #info I'll update that wiki page today
16:11:47 <ChrisPriceAB> #info let's not make it a requirement.  If the guys can swing it up (once we are in stable state) without significant delays we might want to.
16:12:08 * ChrisPriceAB :D we can say it once more for good measure Frank? do the honours
16:13:05 <frankbrockners> #info Agreed. Let's not add mandatory things to the plate the last minute. Per Tim: We'll consider adding Heat - time permitting (so low prio for now).
16:13:11 <trozet> #info Cinder/Ceph and Swift are also missing form the components list.  Will update that on the wiki.
16:13:24 <frankbrockners> thanks Tim
16:13:44 <frankbrockners> ok - let's move to the next topic
16:14:04 <frankbrockners> #info quick status update /  progress made since yesterday
16:14:15 <frankbrockners> Tim do you want to go first?
16:14:18 <trozet> ok
16:14:46 <trozet> #info Foreman was still failing to deploy on LF hardware.  I found there was a VLAN tag with VID 0 being added to frames coming back to the host
16:15:18 <trozet> #info pbandzi helped debug.  We are still not sure why that tag is added by the UCS/FI, but we can fix the problem by restarting networking inside of the VM
16:15:45 <trozet> #info big thanks to pbandzi for finding the work around.  Will update our deploy script to include the workaround
16:16:28 <trozet> #info so current status now is trying to deploy again with the fix
16:16:49 <trozet> #info radez also has a fix for the ISO which will make it bootable
16:16:55 <trozet> thats the end of my status
16:17:01 <frankbrockners> great - sounds like we got rid of a major road block. thanks trozet and pbandzi!
16:17:35 <frankbrockners> Chris, do you want to go next?
16:17:43 <ChrisPriceAB> #info On the fuel track side they have turned a lot of attention to working with getting the functest activities running against the Arno deploy
16:18:07 <frankbrockners> #link http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-bgs/2015/opnfv-bgs.2015-04-23-13.59.html - report of the recent team meeting on Fuel related issues
16:18:26 <ChrisPriceAB> #info on the deploy side the metal deploy is working on the community lab, networking description is being prepared for porting to the LF lab
16:18:50 <ChrisPriceAB> #info next step is to get the NW in place tidy up the deploy and start working in the LF lab.
16:19:12 <ChrisPriceAB> #info pending pbandzi getting the fuel NW peices in place in order to keep the whole ship moving
16:19:20 <ChrisPriceAB> #undo
16:19:29 <ChrisPriceAB> #info pending pbandzi getting the foreman NW pieces in place in order to keep the whole ship moving
16:19:34 * ChrisPriceAB :D
16:20:11 <ChrisPriceAB> #info functest VM compilation ongoing for deployment to JH for automated validation
16:20:13 <frankbrockners> ChrisPriceAB: I do believe that POD1 and POD2 are configured as per the most recent info received. Or are there updates?
16:20:37 <ChrisPriceAB> Well, you are asking one step beyond where I keep up to speed.
16:20:47 <ChrisPriceAB> pleading the fifth.
16:21:09 <ChrisPriceAB> #info Jonas to contact pbandzi to discuss current states and migration activities
16:21:40 * ChrisPriceAB not sure if can add much more...
16:21:48 <frankbrockners> Thanks Chris
16:21:57 * ChrisPriceAB as a perifferal participant (at best)
16:22:12 <frankbrockners> given we have Morgan here. Morgan can you give us a quick update on FuncTest
16:22:23 <morgan_orange> I can try
16:22:39 <frankbrockners> #info Updates from FuncTest - especially: Do we have a definition of which tests are considered for Arno?
16:22:51 <frankbrockners> thanks Morgan
16:22:52 <morgan_orange> #info bench rally ok (manual and CI test) - to be tested on E/// POD and full list of scenario to be finalized
16:22:58 * ChrisPriceAB use the force luke... it's in the source (repo)
16:23:27 <morgan_orange> #info tempest rally ok manual but ko for Ci (jenkins job pending => to be analyzed)
16:23:55 <morgan_orange> #info ODL pbandzi commited some code tonight, it shall be not far from being OK
16:24:27 <morgan_orange> #info vPing no news of the comiter today, open question regarding the Tempest based scenario
16:24:51 * ChrisPriceAB I liike the idea of pulling the tempest based one. keeps things simple...
16:25:04 <frankbrockners> #info Does functest expect to run any other tests than a subset of tempest scenario tests and robot tests retrieved from either openstack or ODL trunk?
16:25:06 <morgan_orange> #info vIMS, contributors did not commit stuff yet, they are waiting for a stable env to test their solution (that is fine on their lab)
16:25:29 <morgan_orange> #info were not able to upload images, initiate VMs,
16:26:10 <morgan_orange> #info jose_lausuch will help to fix issue on E/// POD (prio 1) before moving to LF
16:26:30 <morgan_orange> #info I told them to start document in the rst and commit their script
16:26:32 <frankbrockners> morgan_orange: do you plan for any "home grown OPNFV tests" or just use things from upsteam (with tweaks)?
16:27:28 <morgan_orange> vIMS is somehow a home grown test (and it has the advantage to give a NFV flavour to the openstack installation)
16:27:40 <frankbrockners> is that the only one?
16:27:50 <morgan_orange> for R1 yes
16:28:22 <frankbrockners> #info only test for R1 which is neither from ODL or OSTACK trunk is vIMS test
16:28:22 <morgan_orange> rally and ODL tes suites are coming from upstream (and are not duplicated)
16:28:26 <ChrisPriceAB> want to spin up a quagga on the week-end frankbrockners?
16:28:44 <morgan_orange> the idea after R1 is to work on a set of home made tests that could characterize an NFV cloud
16:28:47 <frankbrockners> #info Do we require any specific VNFs for R1 testing? And if so where do they come from?
16:29:29 * ChrisPriceAB going to step away for a few minutes
16:29:45 <morgan_orange> #info for R1 only specific VNFS should have been vPing scenario and vIMS (with a VNF IMS + a VNF SIP loader)
16:29:59 <frankbrockners> ok - sounds good
16:30:07 <frankbrockners> thanks Morgan
16:30:16 <morgan_orange> can I go back to vacations
16:30:17 <frankbrockners> anything else we need to cover today?
16:30:25 <morgan_orange> sunshine was bright in Guernesey
16:30:36 * frankbrockners tell me more :-)
16:31:03 <frankbrockners> if there are no additional topics - we can close for today...
16:31:12 <frankbrockners> (and close on time :-))
16:31:23 <frankbrockners> alright... thanks everyone!
16:31:41 <frankbrockners> #endmeeting