========================= #opnfv-meeting: OPNFV TSC ========================= Meeting started by ChrisPriceAB at 14:02:32 UTC. The full logs are available at http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-meeting/2015/opnfv-meeting.2015-05-05-14.02.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * roll call (ChrisPriceAB, 14:02:36) * Uli (ulik, 14:02:40) * Gerald Kunzmann (DOCOMO) (Gerald_K, 14:03:05) * brady.allen.johnson@ericsson.com (SFC) (ebrjohn, 14:03:11) * Dirk Kutscher (dku, 14:03:15) * Frank Brockners (frankbrockners, 14:03:30) * Tapio Tallgren (tallgren, 14:03:32) * Tim Rozet (trozet, 14:05:17) * rajeev (rajeev, 14:05:21) * Rajeev Koodli (rajeev, 14:05:36) * Approval of previous minutes (ChrisPriceAB, 14:05:38) * lack of quorum to approve minutes (ChrisPriceAB, 14:06:05) * Trevor Cooper (trevor_intel1, 14:06:25) * Agenda Bashing (ChrisPriceAB, 14:06:28) * Jonas Bjurel ([1]JonasB, 14:07:01) * Julien (julien_ZTE, 14:07:34) * https://wiki.opnfv.org/wiki/tsc (frankbrockners, 14:08:53) * no addition to the Agenda (ChrisPriceAB, 14:09:00) * Arno Project plans & tracking (ChrisPriceAB, 14:09:29) * OPNFV docs is moving quite well (Gerald_K, 14:09:31) * documentation has graphics etc, needs reviewing (Gerald_K, 14:09:55) * Uli questiosn which part of Octopus should be included in Arno release documentation (Gerald_K, 14:12:17) * development process is not part of Arno, but the capability to do automatic deplyoment should be part of Arno (Gerald_K, 14:13:27) * release docs should not have a "timestamp", otherwise release docs must be associated (forever) with a specific release (Gerald_K, 14:16:26) * Frank wants to see the docs being announced and release so that folks can hookup their lab (Gerald_K, 14:17:47) * Frank proposes Octopus team should come up with a proposal what docs they would add to the release (Gerald_K, 14:19:12) * currently 4 documents from Octopus. "Artifacts" and "Jenkins job builder" are not required as part of Arno (Gerald_K, 14:19:55) * ACTION: octopus (ulik) to add a Jira to opnfvdocs to include the Lab integration doc in the Arno release. (ChrisPriceAB, 14:21:38) * Uli summarizes that 1 document from Octopus should be made part of Arno such that people know how to hookup their lab (Gerald_K, 14:21:59) * Release readiness report (Gerald_K, 14:23:05) * Foreman working on LF lab. Work in progress to move Fuel work from Ericsson lab to LF. (rpaik, 14:24:15) * there are still uncertainties making it difficult to fix a release date (Gerald_K, 14:29:26) * In the LF infrastructure, need autodeploy to work, hooked up to Jenkins, and requreed Functest tests are passing (rpaik, 14:31:32) * Arno is not yet ready to be announced as ready in one week. (ChrisPriceAB, 14:33:45) * ACTION: rpaik to set up a release readiness review on this Thursday. (ChrisPriceAB, 14:34:29) * Media and WiKi content and management responsibilities (ChrisPriceAB, 14:34:54) * we need to be aware media releases will publish our wiki links. our WiKi will need to be maintained accurately. (ChrisPriceAB, 14:43:03) * LINK: https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/Vancouver_OpenStack (rpaik, 14:47:40) * ACTION: Pharos team to propose and present to the TSC on the lab definitions and tracking (ChrisPriceAB, 14:48:05) * Update on OPNFV Day agenda at OpenStack Summit (ChrisPriceAB, 14:48:09) * LINK: https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/Vancouver_OpenStack openstack planning etherpad (ChrisPriceAB, 14:48:27) * Wrap-up discussion on the Project Proposal & Creation Review Checklist (ChrisPriceAB, 14:54:09) * LINK: https://wiki.opnfv.org/developers/project_proposal_creation_review_checklist proposed checklist (ChrisPriceAB, 14:54:27) * Chris reminds people that the TSC voted against requiring proposal review in the Technical Community calls but encouraged people to take advantage of input during @the Technical Community (rpaik, 15:08:30) * ACTION: chrispricab, rpaik, bin to return next week with a proposal (ChrisPriceAB, 15:15:40) * Requirements project document approvals and next steps: Uli (ChrisPriceAB, 15:15:45) * ACTION: postponed to next week. (ChrisPriceAB, 15:18:44) * Goal is to make selected requirement documents public before OpenStack Summit (Gerald_K, 15:18:56) * ulik to take over as chair of the call for the remainder (ChrisPriceAB, 15:19:41) * questions are 1) any formal process required, 2) how to publish; HTML; which server?, 3) link with Release (Gerald_K, 15:19:55) * Project reviews (ChrisPriceAB, 15:20:11) * Project creation review of the ONOS Framework (ONOSFW) project (ChrisPriceAB, 15:21:05) * https://wiki.opnfv.org/onosfw link to the project proprosal (ChrisPriceAB, 15:21:24) * Mike Young presents the ONOSFW starting with the checklist (ulik, 15:22:39) * Mike uses slides that can be found on wiki (ulik, 15:23:14) * feedback about installers has been added according to last week's discussion (ulik, 15:23:41) * question about ONOS being a trademark, answer it isn't (ulik, 15:26:53) * question whether we need to check other lists of trademarks beside US. Answer, ONOS is the first project doing the check (ulik, 15:27:57) * Chris clarifies that trademark check will be done at proper time and at the moment not mandatory (ulik, 15:29:01) * Mike clarifies that potential clash with the ONOS project should be clear since ON.lab people are participating. (ulik, 15:30:33) * question about committers from other companies - Answer others didn't step up. (ulik, 15:30:54) * Bin appreciates to add the diversity via this project (ulik, 15:31:36) * Mike invites people to join as committers (ulik, 15:32:38) * Daniel Smith stepping up and volunteering as committer (ulik, 15:33:09) * - Daniel echoing for Rajiv +1 (lmcdasm, 15:35:11) * +1 Dave Neery (Tom___, 15:35:25) * VOTE: Voted on "Approve the ONOSFW project?" Results are, +1: 8 (ulik, 15:36:37) * ONOSFW project is approved - Congratulation (ulik, 15:37:28) * Brady Johnson introducing the Service Function Chaining Project (ulik, 15:38:13) * Brady using slides and showing checklist (ulik, 15:39:02) * There is a very good overlap between the ODL project and the OPNFV collaborative development project (ulik, 15:41:43) * walking through the project proposal in wiki (ulik, 15:42:31) * Question about NSH /VXLAN focus, what is the preference? Answer NSH supports service chaining by the new header (ulik, 15:47:44) * question: is it transparent to physical hardware? Answer should be transparent (ulik, 15:49:14) * also there are more options, MPLS, GRE (ulik, 15:50:07) * some explanation about the relationship of SFC with GBP (ulik, 15:50:57) * question: How much of the project is related to policies in GBP? Answer: SFC transparent to GBP (ulik, 15:52:18) * question: what is additional in OPNFV? Will it bring addtional requirements to ODL? Answer yes, details we will need to see (ulik, 15:53:58) * Ray proxy for Rajeev (rpaik, 15:56:50) * VOTE: Voted on "Approve the creation of the SFC project?" Results are, +1: 7 (ulik, 15:57:14) * project SFC approved (ulik, 15:57:51) Meeting ended at 15:58:28 UTC. Action items, by person ----------------------- * rpaik * rpaik to set up a release readiness review on this Thursday. * chrispricab, rpaik, bin to return next week with a proposal * ulik * octopus (ulik) to add a Jira to opnfvdocs to include the Lab integration doc in the Arno release. * **UNASSIGNED** * Pharos team to propose and present to the TSC on the lab definitions and tracking * postponed to next week. People present (lines said) --------------------------- * ChrisPriceAB (37) * ulik (30) * collabot (22) * Gerald_K (20) * Tom___ (14) * frankbrockners (10) * rpaik (9) * lmcdasm (6) * dneary (4) * julien_ZTE (3) * tallgren (3) * ebrjohn (2) * dku (2) * rajeev (2) * [1]JonasB (1) * fdegir (1) * icbts (1) * trevor_intel1 (1) * trozet (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4