16:00:07 #startmeeting BGS daily checkin on Arno release readiness 16:00:07 Meeting started Tue May 5 16:00:07 2015 UTC. The chair is pbandzi. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:00:07 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 16:00:07 The meeting name has been set to 'bgs_daily_checkin_on_arno_release_readiness' 16:00:18 #info Peter Bandzi 16:00:23 #info Tim Rozet 16:00:32 #info Fatih Degirmenci 16:00:52 agenda will be same as usual :) 16:01:21 #info Dan Radez 16:01:23 functest update, and bgs installers update 16:01:39 <[1]JonasB> #info Jonas Bjurel 16:02:08 should we add anything else to agenda today? 16:02:44 #topis Functest update status 16:02:59 lets start with functest. Morgan can you please add info 16:03:27 morgan_orange: ping 16:03:39 hi 16:04:25 Hi Morgan I saw copule of mail between you and tim, can you please send info for latest status 16:04:53 anything new from yesterday? 16:05:34 I was able to reconnect to LF POD 2 16:05:52 can you please #info that 16:06:14 #info LF POD2 available for functest 16:06:27 #undo 16:06:27 Removing item from minutes: 16:06:29 #info LF POD2 includes heat now, which was a prerequisites for vIMS 16:06:40 #topic Functest update status 16:07:01 #info morgan_orange: LF POD2 available for functest 16:07:11 #info Frank Brockners (sorry for being late) 16:07:25 #info Morgan (sorry to have not info) 16:07:53 #info LF POD2 tests to be restarted and discussed with Tim, goal 100% tempest smoke test 16:08:06 #info ODL testing on LF POD2, trying to figure out why some test fails now... seems to me robot framework paramters issue 16:08:41 thanks Moragan 16:09:04 #topic BGS status workplan review 16:09:13 Dan, Tim, Jonas ? 16:09:42 <[1]JonasB> #info Quite good progress, see todays status MOM 16:09:50 #info daniel smith 16:09:50 #msg test 16:09:51 <[1]JonasB> #link http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-bgs/2015/opnfv-bgs.2015-05-05-13.57.html 16:10:31 #info Foreman plans on completing some of the documentation, user guide, etc. Other than that will work with functest team and debug any issues with smoke tests 16:10:32 <[1]JonasB> #info High level, Autodeployment work in ERI LAB, Now moving to LF-Lab 16:10:45 <[1]JonasB> Thats all from me 16:11:01 radez, want to comment on the ISO? 16:11:05 thanks Jonas. 16:12:58 #info ISO is just waiting for the patch to be merged right now 16:13:20 #info I'm continuing to work on caching the bits to it for the next patch 16:14:31 I think thats it from us pbandzi 16:14:37 thanks 16:14:42 radez: 409 is merged 16:14:51 is there anything else we want to discuss? 16:14:59 oh awesome, I must have mised the notification 16:15:00 one question: last week we discussed 16:16:03 to have a meeting on what "released, latest, etc" would mean in the context of what we release - so that "release" is something static and can be maintained as such 16:16:21 did such a meeting / and associated wiki with a proposal happen already? 16:16:46 <[1]JonasB> frankbrockners: Me and Daniel had an AP to work on a Wiki for that 16:16:59 <[1]JonasB> frankbrockners: No meeting yet. 16:17:11 ok - thanks [1]JonasB 16:17:21 so this is a per installer thing or a project thing? 16:17:45 let's have one definition for BGS 16:17:49 <[1]JonasB> trozet: General guidelines we all should agree on 16:18:19 <[1]JonasB> trozet: But there are always exceptions to guidelines :-) 16:18:20 frank - when do you wanna chat about it (since we had some clarification from Uli and team today) 16:18:30 about what was in and out (ci vs. ISO, etc) 16:18:40 anytime... asap :-) 16:18:51 how about tomorrow morning (my time) 16:18:53 ill send you a invite 16:19:04 by when do you think you could have a proposal on a wiki? 16:19:04 ? 16:19:15 hmm. we should have a meeting 16:19:21 and then you can i can post a proposal 16:19:30 less picking away after 16:19:31 i think 16:19:32 tomorrow morning is good - but let's make sure we have something that we can all jointly look at 16:19:33 <[1]JonasB> frankbrockners: By end this week 16:20:06 sorry- im a bit confused.. are you expecting to have something there already 16:20:14 we can briefly synch tomorrow if you like - how about 10am PT? 16:20:22 or are you and i coming up with something and then can put it out for everyone else to look at (end of week target)? 16:20:40 works as well 16:20:45 sure.. i was thinking more 8am CET (which would be 1pm in Europe) 16:20:48 <[1]JonasB> frankbrockners: We really have too many meetings nowadays! 16:21:03 am at this NFV WC thing right now - so in PDT timezone 16:21:04 but whatever. lets sort out the time offline 16:21:09 ok 16:21:19 <[1]JonasB> So maybe not now, but Im interested for planning purposes if we are thinking on a SR1 release, maybe for next mon meeting? 16:21:37 #action meeting tommorrow on what "released, latest, etc" would mean 16:23:32 Can wee end this meeting now? 16:24:10 3 16:24:13 2 16:24:16 1 16:24:23 #endmeeting