14:00:19 #startmeeting OPNFV TSC meeting 14:00:19 Meeting started Tue Jul 14 14:00:19 2015 UTC. The chair is frankbrockners. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:19 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 14:00:19 The meeting name has been set to 'opnfv_tsc_meeting' 14:02:20 #chair rpaik 14:02:20 Current chairs: frankbrockners rpaik 14:02:24 #info dlenrow 14:02:29 #info Uli 14:02:35 #info Ildiko Vancsa 14:02:46 #info Juha Oravainen (Nokia) 14:02:48 #info Uli 14:02:50 #info Dirk Kutscher 14:02:51 #info Tim Rozet 14:02:56 #info Ildiko is stand in for Chris Price 14:03:16 #info fuqiao proxy for deng hui 14:03:30 #info Parviz Yegani 14:03:37 #info Juha Oravainen is stand in for Tapio Tallgren 14:03:42 #info Julien 14:03:42 #info Gerald Kunzmann (DOCOMO) proxy for Ashiq Khan 14:04:11 #topic approval of previous 14:04:25 #topic approval of previous minutes 14:05:03 #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/wiki/tsc#july_7_2015 14:05:11 #info Chris Wright 14:06:01 #info previous minutes were approved by the TSC 14:06:04 #info Trevor Cooper 14:06:09 #topic agenda bashing 14:06:24 #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/wiki/tsc#july_14_2015 14:08:44 #info Rajeev Koodli 14:08:58 #info agenda was agreed 14:09:18 #topic Requirements projects development process 14:09:23 #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/requirements_projects 14:10:15 #chair dlenrow 14:10:15 Current chairs: dlenrow frankbrockners rpaik 14:10:36 #info Narinder Gupta 14:11:35 #info Frank Brockners 14:12:31 #info Ildiko presents the current thinking on evolving the requirements projects development process 14:13:28 #info ildikov notes that requirements projects should have end-to-end coverage from use cases to implementation 14:14:42 #info there will be a breakout session at the upcoming hackfest for further discussions on requirements projects 14:15:06 can you guys post the meeting agenda? 14:15:29 tnadeau: https://wiki.opnfv.org/wiki/tsc#july_14_2015 14:15:36 Frankbrockners: last minute agenda item? Splitting two hours TSC call into 1 hour TSC and 1 hour "technical work stream? 14:16:03 dlenrow - we can add this if we have time 14:18:54 #info Doctor project was a kind of "test" project using git and gerrit and to get lessons learned 14:19:08 #chair Gerald_K 14:19:08 Current chairs: Gerald_K dlenrow frankbrockners rpaik 14:20:26 #info frankbrockners asks if there’s a test project to test out the new approch. ildikov responds that she can look for new projects as a beach head 14:22:54 If it's not direct edit, we need an editor 14:27:06 #info current proposal includes two sections: (1) generic thoughts on the evolution of the current set of project categories (2) specifics on the requirements projects' process 14:27:19 #info discussion should focus on (2) 14:29:39 #action RayNugent and ildikov to start a discussion on (1): Thoughts on evolving the current set of project categories 14:29:50 #topic Request for formal approval to allow CI/CD Pipeline to support script and ISO deploy methods 14:32:54 #info for Arno, we both support a deployment of both - script based and .iso based deployment 14:34:44 Brahmaputra 14:34:49 #info for Brahmaputra, it is too early to decide on what the packaging options would be 14:35:50 #agree for Arno - we support deployment both ways (.iso and script based) as part of the CI/CD pipeline 14:36:56 #info release artifacts are bootable disk images, i.e. ".iso"s 14:37:20 #topic Support for OPNFV hardware @LF data center 14:38:51 #info LF right now only focuses on bare metal hardware support (cabling, power, network connectivity) for OPNFV 14:39:21 #info Contract with LF does not include configuration of the LF lab hardware. 14:40:09 #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/pharos/lf_support 14:41:52 #info looking for additional infrastructure support from the community 14:44:49 #info I can volunteer to help 14:45:25 great trozet - could you add youself to the wiki 14:46:06 #topic Quarterly Awards 14:47:02 #info More than a dozen nominations received for quaterly rewards - nominations still open ('till noon tomorrow PDT) 14:47:11 #info please send nominations to Ray 14:47:35 #info Ray will send email to TSC members by Thursday for voting 14:49:57 #topic Splitting two hours TSC call into 1 hour TSC and 1 hour "technical work stream 14:51:44 #info proposal is to have 2 calls, with 1hr each. One for TSC, one for technical topics 14:52:01 #info TSC call would be focused on decision making only - and less so on technical discussions 14:52:09 #info helps TSC members know when they need to attend for a quorum 14:52:59 have 1 hour, and extend as necessary (e.g., while closer to releases) 14:52:59 +1 on shortened meeting time 14:53:21 @cdub makes a great point 14:53:21 tnadeau: Error: "cdub" is not a valid command. 14:53:29 cclub makes a great point 14:53:39 club that is 14:53:50 cdub that is 14:53:51 heh 14:55:34 #action dlenrow to bring the discussion to the list (topic: reduce TSC call to 1hr (focus on decision making) - and have technical discussions done in another forum (e.g. thrusdays tech call)) 14:55:57 #topic Project creation review: Apex 14:56:20 #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/project_proposals/apex_opnfv 14:56:21 #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/project_proposals/apex_opnfv 14:56:58 #info continuation of the Foreman work that was done as part of BGS 14:58:26 #link https://bluejeans.com/s/8o1U/ rdo-manager demo 14:58:37 #info will include fixes for Foreman for Arno SR1 and a new installer (RDO manager) for Brahmaputra 14:59:18 uli: I think of Bin's Thursday meeting as project review, but you are correct. 15:04:10 #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/genesis - draft on Genesis 15:05:47 i need to drop, can we vote soon or do i need to pass my voting to my proxy? 15:05:55 #info anyone interested in being committers/contributors to the project, contact trozet 15:07:47 #startvote Approve APEX as an OPNFV project? -1, 0, +1 15:07:47 Begin voting on: Approve APEX as an OPNFV project? Valid vote options are -1, 0, +1. 15:07:47 Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 15:07:53 #vote +1 15:07:55 #vote +1 15:07:56 #vote +1 15:07:58 #vote +1 15:07:58 #vote +1 15:08:01 #vote +1 15:08:02 #vote +1 15:08:03 #vote +1 15:08:03 #vote +1 15:08:18 #vote +1 15:08:57 #vote +1 15:09:04 #endvote 15:09:04 Voted on "Approve APEX as an OPNFV project?" Results are 15:09:04 +1 (11): frankbrockners, dku, dlenrow, rajeev, tnadeau, cdub, Gerald_K, uli-k, JuhaO, ildikov, Parviz 15:09:26 Well done APEX team 15:09:27 thanks all 15:09:48 #info Tim Rozet will be my proxy as RH TSC rep 15:09:51 * cdub has to drop 15:09:53 #info APEX has been approved by the TSC. Congrats 15:10:12 #topic Project creation review: Connectivity services LSO 15:10:38 #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/lar-e 15:12:16 #info No representative of Connectivity Services LSO project team was on the TSC call. Review postponed to next week. 15:12:36 #topic Project creation review: Releng 15:12:53 #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/project_proposals/release_engineering 15:17:02 #info Releng project is to formalize the already ongoing work for "OPNFV infrastructure" across various projects. releng repo exists already and was intrumental for Arno. 15:17:15 frankbrockners, Kevin from the LSO project is joining the call. Not sure if there will be time to revisit the topic. 15:17:51 RandyLevensalor: If we have time (I'd assume so), we'll go back to LSO project review today 15:17:58 thx 15:18:19 RandyLevensalor: Is Kevin already here? 15:18:53 frankbrockners, He is dialing in to the go to meeting. Does he need to be there or on IRC? 15:19:23 RandyLevensalor: gotomeeting would be sufficient 15:25:54 #startvote Approve Release-Engineering (RELENG) as an OPNFV project? -1, 0, +1 15:25:54 Begin voting on: Approve Release-Engineering (RELENG) as an OPNFV project? Valid vote options are -1, 0, +1. 15:25:54 Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 15:25:59 #vote +1 15:26:01 #vote +1 15:26:02 #vote +1 15:26:04 #vote +1 15:26:05 #vote +1 15:26:06 #vote +1 15:26:07 #vote +1 15:26:07 #vote +1 15:26:08 #vote +1 (cdub proxy) 15:26:08 trozet: +1 (cdub proxy) is not a valid option. Valid options are -1, 0, +1. 15:26:08 #vote +1 15:26:08 #vote +1 15:26:13 #vote +1 15:26:17 #vote +1 15:26:34 #endvote 15:26:34 Voted on "Approve Release-Engineering (RELENG) as an OPNFV project?" Results are 15:26:34 +1 (12): frankbrockners, dlenrow, dku, JuhaO, rajeev, tnadeau, Gerald_K, uli-k, ildikov, julien_ZTE, trozet, Parviz 15:26:37 club #infoed above that tim is his proxy so this is ok 15:26:52 cdub -> club 15:27:02 thanks 15:27:14 #info Project release engineering was approved by the TSC. Congrats! 15:27:34 #topic Project creation review: Connectivity services LSO 15:27:45 #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/lar-e 15:32:35 #info requirements project for API on OpenDaylight controller to drive MetroEthernet Services (ELINE etc.) 15:35:15 #info ODL is just the initial focus of the effort - API could apply to other controllers as well 15:36:30 #info Bryan Sullivan 15:37:21 #info can you add me to the cmmiters to help support Openstack API and ONOS support 15:37:27 #link http://lists.opnfv.org/pipermail/opnfv-tech-discuss/2015-July/003655.html Kevin’s answers to community questions 15:38:34 #info if Michael young is added I need not be added as commiter but just a contributor 15:39:37 #info suggestion to change the repom name to all lower case with no hyphens 15:40:35 #remove 15:40:59 #info suggestion to change the repo name to all lower case with no hyphens 15:42:12 Having trouble with my microphone. I'm happy to vote for this, but as chairman of ONF NBI there are disconnects that we will need to iron out. I'll follow up with CableLabs team... 15:42:23 #info ildikov to contact Kevin reg. new requirements projects process 15:42:43 rpaik: thanks :) 15:43:00 we can vote to approve contingent on changine repo name 15:43:18 thx ray 15:43:45 #info Having trouble with my microphone. I'm happy to vote for this, but as chairman of ONF NBI there are disconnects that we will need to iron out. I'll follow up with CableLabs team.. 15:43:57 #startvote Approve "Connectivity Services LSO" as an OPNFV project? -1, 0, +1 15:43:57 Begin voting on: Approve "Connectivity Services LSO" as an OPNFV project? Valid vote options are -1, 0, +1. 15:43:57 Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 15:43:59 #vote +1 15:44:00 #vote +1 15:44:01 #vote + 1 15:44:01 Parviz: + 1 is not a valid option. Valid options are -1, 0, +1. 15:44:01 #vote +1 15:44:01 #vote +1 15:44:04 #vote +1 15:44:06 #vote +1 15:44:08 #vote +1 15:44:09 #vote +1 15:44:27 #vote +1 15:44:33 #vote +1 15:44:40 #endvote 15:44:40 Voted on "Approve "Connectivity Services LSO" as an OPNFV project?" Results are 15:44:40 +1 (10): dlenrow, ildikov_, rajeev, bryan_att, JuhaO, Gerald_K, uli-k, julien_ZTE, trozet, Parviz 15:45:18 oops sorry - had a quick call come in - 15:45:22 #vote +1 15:45:29 Congratulation lso 15:45:35 #info The TSC approved project "Connectivity Services LSO". Congrats. 15:46:12 thank you everyone! 15:46:17 #endmeeting