========================= #opnfv-meeting: OPNFV TSC ========================= Meeting started by ChrisPriceAB at 14:00:17 UTC. The full logs are available at http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-meeting/2015/opnfv-meeting.2015-08-11-14.00.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * roll call (ChrisPriceAB, 14:00:23) * Chris Price (ChrisPriceAB, 14:00:27) * Ashlee Young (ashyoung, 14:00:51) * Frank Brockners (frankbrockners, 14:01:05) * Tapio Tallgren (tapio__, 14:02:06) * Ildiko Vancsa (ildikov, 14:02:21) * Wenjing (Wenjing, 14:03:00) * Bryan Sullivan (bryan_att, 14:03:15) * Dave Neary, proxy for Chris Wright (dneary, 14:03:45) * Approval of previous minutes of meeting (ChrisPriceAB, 14:03:53) * AGREED: the TSC approves the previous minutes of meeting. (ChrisPriceAB, 14:04:27) * Agenda Bashing (ChrisPriceAB, 14:04:52) * LINK: https://wiki.opnfv.org/wiki/tsc TSC Agenda (ChrisPriceAB, 14:04:58) * OPNFV Project classification discussion (ChrisPriceAB, 14:06:42) * LINK: https://wiki.opnfv.org/requirements_projects?&#project_lifecycle (ildikov, 14:07:04) * LINK: https://wiki.opnfv.org/requirements_projects Link to the proposal (ChrisPriceAB, 14:07:07) * Ildiko outlines a proposal to combine the project types in the project lifecycle document into a single project type. (ChrisPriceAB, 14:10:49) * the projects would include needed combinations of documentation, upstream development, needed integration and documentation. (ChrisPriceAB, 14:11:23) * this is reflective of the way the projects are working, adopting an agile fashion of development that is inclusive of all aspects of working on technology development. (ChrisPriceAB, 14:12:18) * ildikov describes the next step includes the need to update the project lifecycle document to reflect the listed proposal. (ChrisPriceAB, 14:14:49) * The question is raised that if a project does not result in the development of code should it exist in OPNFV at all? (ChrisPriceAB, 14:15:45) * ildikov describes that projects intending to provide requirements are already doing that. (ChrisPriceAB, 14:17:04) * : I need to leave early today. Vikram Dham would be alternate for me. (Wenjing, 14:18:11) * trevor_intel (trevor_intel, 14:20:20) * LINK: http://projects.bitergia.com/opnfv/browser/scm-companies.html (aricg, 14:26:19) * the proposal includes the re-classification of project types to; Continuous Build and Integration, Continuous Deployment and Testing & New Requirements and Features (ChrisPriceAB, 14:31:50) * the proposal also removes the need for the "top level project" and aligns the project lifecycle reviews across the category types. (ChrisPriceAB, 14:32:28) * AGREED: the TSC agrees to pursue further development of the above described changes. A community activity will be established to create a firm proposal. (ChrisPriceAB, 14:41:59) * ACTION: Ildikov: to lead a community activity to revise the Project Lifecycle document and any needed changes to the bylaws for TSC review at a future date. (ChrisPriceAB, 14:43:04) * question was raised what happens when you remove the “Top-Level” project? (rpaik, 14:43:36) * Pls include me in team to propose changes (dlenrow, 14:45:14) * OPNFV Support review and next steps (ChrisPriceAB, 14:45:49) * please dont forget to include RayNugent as co-lead (RayNugent, 14:45:54) * postponed this topic to next week. (ChrisPriceAB, 14:46:01) * OPNFV Brahmaputra Release discussion (ChrisPriceAB, 14:46:12) * please also include me in the team (ashyoung, 14:46:19) * Debra reflects that there is limited dependency on OpenStack Liberty which makes a December releaese a viable release date. (ChrisPriceAB, 14:46:58) * This raises the question of providing a Brahmaputra release in December based on Kilo, which would be after the Liberty release of OpenStack. (ChrisPriceAB, 14:47:45) * there may be dependencies on a future Linux Kernel release planned to be available in December. (ChrisPriceAB, 14:48:03) * There is a lot of information emerging on cross project dependencies, this requires further analysis from dependant projects. (ChrisPriceAB, 14:49:33) * Discussion if the community is comfortable with being “behind” on OpenStack release if we stay with June/December cadence. (rpaik, 15:04:21) * feedback that installer support & testing will likely require ~2 months post OpenStack release (rpaik, 15:06:27) * LINK: https://wiki.opnfv.org/releases/brahmaputra/release_plan?&#brahmaputra_release_participating_projects (debrascott, 15:08:24) * LINK: https://wiki.opnfv.org/releases/brahmaputra/release_plan?&#brahmaputra_release_participating_projects Brahmaputra release planning, including definition of "lab ready" (ChrisPriceAB, 15:08:52) * suggestion made to agree on dates for Miestones A/B/C next week (rpaik, 15:27:51) * LINK: https://wiki.opnfv.org/releases/brahmaputra/upstream_projects_schedules (frankbrockners, 15:28:01) * Creation review for the Genesis project. (ChrisPriceAB, 15:30:15) * LINK: https://wiki.opnfv.org/genesis/genesis_project_proposal genesis project proposal (ChrisPriceAB, 15:30:23) * the genesis project intends to work across the installer projects to create a common set of requirements for the installers to comply to during the release project. (ChrisPriceAB, 15:32:19) * the genesis project will additionally work with component teams to facilitate the integration of new components into the installers. (ChrisPriceAB, 15:32:53) * LINK: https://wiki.opnfv.org/genesis (frankbrockners, 15:34:00) * governance details are still in draft and will evolve (rpaik, 15:46:05) * there are quetsions around some the text in the governance described on the genesis page. To be clarified further within the project. (ChrisPriceAB, 15:56:38) * ashyoung will help clean up genesis governance (ashyoung, 15:57:16) * VOTE: Voted on "TSC to vote to create the Genesis project?" Results are, +1: 8 (ChrisPriceAB, 15:57:52) * AGREED: The TSC agrees to create the Genesis project in OPNFV. (ChrisPriceAB, 15:58:44) Meeting ended at 15:58:53 UTC. Action items, by person ----------------------- * ildikov * Ildikov: to lead a community activity to revise the Project Lifecycle document and any needed changes to the bylaws for TSC review at a future date. People present (lines said) --------------------------- * ChrisPriceAB (42) * dneary (20) * ashyoung (19) * frankbrockners (12) * collabot (10) * bryan_att (6) * rpaik (5) * ildikov (4) * TomNadeau (3) * bjskerry (3) * debrascott (3) * dlenrow (2) * VikramDham (2) * Wenjing (2) * tapio__ (2) * aricg (1) * RayNugent (1) * HKirksey (1) * Parviz (1) * trevor_intel (1) * fdegir (1) * mlynch (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4