14:00:20 #startmeeting Octopus weekly meeting 14:00:20 Meeting started Mon Sep 28 14:00:20 2015 UTC. The chair is uli-k. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:20 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 14:00:20 The meeting name has been set to 'octopus_weekly_meeting' 14:00:32 Hi everybody! 14:00:37 #topic roll-call 14:00:47 please type #info 14:00:48 hi Uli 14:00:54 #info chenshuai 14:01:00 #info Narinder Gupta 14:01:20 #info Fatih Degirmenci 14:01:51 #info meimei 14:02:17 #info Peter Bandzi 14:02:26 Did anyone from you participate last week? I didn't have a chance to ask trozet about the meeting 14:03:27 it seems not much happened last week 14:03:27 http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-meeting/2015/opnfv-meeting.2015-09-21-14.01.html 14:03:30 due to SR1 work 14:03:36 sorry, I had the bad network last week 14:03:38 and due to lack of people 14:03:49 I feared so..... 14:04:05 I put a few things on the agenda for today: 14:04:09 #topic agenda bashing 14:04:14 #info Tim Rozet 14:04:19 #info Dan Radez 14:04:28 #info Action item review - Milestone C for B-Release - Arno SR1 work - some Current sorking topics 14:04:44 Anything we should add? 14:04:54 uli-k: it was mostly pbandzi and I chatting in the meeting about current CI issues nothing really to report 14:05:07 OK. Thanks, trozet! 14:05:28 OK let's start with AIs then. 14:05:35 #topic Action Item review 14:05:53 #info first AI: uli-k trozet ChrisPriceAB: clarify the need of doing Brahmaputra release on LF Lab 14:06:05 :D 14:06:09 I think we don't have progress there? 14:06:19 Nope. 14:06:25 So keep open..... 14:06:28 #action uli-k trozet ChrisPriceAB: clarify the need of doing Brahmaputra release on LF Lab 14:06:39 SR1 and MSC have been a little heavy... 14:07:03 yes..... 14:07:07 #info next two AIs on me about Pharos lab support. 14:07:27 I also don't have much progress there - at least no results. 14:07:38 So let me repeat them .... 14:07:50 #action uli-k talk to Huawei lab guys to support Pharos 14:08:00 #action uli-k to trigger other lab reps according to community lab overview wiki 14:08:16 #info next one about clean-up of committer list. 14:08:32 #info three committers agreed to be removed from the octopus committer list: 14:08:53 #info Zhangyu, Huqiqi, Wes Hayutin agreed to be removed. 14:09:01 Do we need to vote? 14:09:25 Committers just need to send you a mail to stand down. 14:09:43 I have that. So I will update the INFO file. 14:09:55 The TSC should be informed with the relevant information and reasons (TSC still oversee's committer removal) 14:10:05 #action uli-k to remove 3 committers from INFO file and inform TSC 14:10:13 (A mail to the mailing list should do.) 14:10:37 I will raise it tomorrow I think for a discussion as we have not be super clear on the process at the TSC yet. 14:11:11 I fully agree. There was a lot of traffic promoting committers before the election :D 14:11:24 I tried to contact three more committers, but didn't get answers: 14:11:55 #info Palani, Chengappa and Sudha Kumari were contacted by uli-k, but no answer 14:12:14 #info Chengappa had answered in July, but didn't start working. 14:12:36 #info Frank didn't confirm to me that we can remove Palani. 14:12:53 Should we raise this to the TSC? 14:13:48 I can also take the action to talk again to Frank and to Dave Lenrow. 14:13:55 What do you think? 14:14:13 I think you can ask TSC 14:14:18 what is the process if the committers don't answer/want to stand down and do nothing? 14:14:33 any "expiry date"? :) 14:14:58 Since these committers haven't been active more than 6 month, according to the TSC charter, the TSC can remove them. Right ChrisPriceAB? 14:16:31 OK. Since ChrisPriceAB said he will raise discussion on committers tomorrow, we can push that to TSC. 14:16:46 #action uli-k to bring discussion on these 3 to TSC. 14:17:08 OK. Sorry too much time for such issue..... 14:17:31 #info Next AI: uli-k to raise the issue in project meeting so projects come forward with their dependency on octopus to setup their pipeline 14:17:55 We did that (fdegir and me). 14:18:11 We received requests from IPv6 and from armband. 14:18:22 I created Jira for those. 14:18:32 Suggest to close the AI. 14:18:53 moving on..... 14:19:14 #topic Milestone C for B-Release 14:19:25 I have sent milestone C report. 14:19:52 So that should be fine. However, there still needs to be added some more details in the Jira. 14:20:06 comments? 14:20:29 #topic Arno SR1 work 14:20:55 any news / problems / Successes? 14:21:19 BGS and FuncTest guys are doing the heavylifting 14:21:33 so I stop and let pbandzi trozet to comment on it 14:21:45 or jose_lausuch 14:22:21 #info I think we are waiting on a foreman run right now, to make sure odl tests pass with the help of jose_lausuch and pbandzi 14:22:35 not sure about Fuel status, Jonas1, do you want to comment? 14:23:43 I think he is not here 14:24:06 #info Not much to report for Arno SR1 from CI point of view 14:24:26 sorry uli-k, doing multiple things :) 14:25:16 let's move on to the three current working topics, I noticed in the mails.... 14:25:33 #topic Current issues: Connecting ZTE lab 14:25:50 I think MatthewLi, you are helping them, right? 14:25:55 At this time (pending TSC discussion) the process should be. Try to get in touch with inactive committers. Talk to them about stepping down if they will not be active in the project. If they send a mail stating they will step down they can be removed. (Then send a mail to the TSC and remove them form the INFO) 14:26:00 Any issues? progress? 14:26:15 * ChrisPriceAB thinks the TSC should only really need to vote on "non voluntary removals" 14:27:01 ChrisPriceAB, we have 3 voluntarily stepping down, and 3 we cannot get in touch. 14:27:09 We have moved on..... 14:27:41 and it looks like also MatthewLi is doing multiple things..... :D 14:27:57 Let's go to the next one.... 14:28:01 zte slave have been online 14:28:02 we need to find out what we can run on zte lab 14:28:20 it seems they can't upload/download isos due to low bandwidth 14:28:29 hmmmm 14:28:32 we can perhaps run some test framework validation on it 14:28:47 or an installer that doesn't require iso 14:29:04 but we can move on and take this offline 14:29:29 yes. 14:29:48 #topic current issues: CI for armband 14:30:32 this is a tricky topic and it really depends on the ambition level of the armband project 14:30:49 do they want to mirror all CI stuff runs on Intel 14:30:59 I think they have ambitions for that. 14:31:02 meaning validating all installers 14:31:12 good 14:31:32 then we need arm labs setup asap assuming they want to be part of B-release 14:31:48 I think I saw the C-report. 14:32:10 And durign creation review they told us the ambitions.... 14:32:27 I don't know about *all* installers. 14:32:42 But I am sure, there will be more than on. 14:32:45 one. 14:33:20 when is the next milestone? 14:33:54 I think that is something like feature complete. So there will be some time - and work to do until then. 14:33:57 dec 1 14:34:09 so we have about 2 months 14:35:06 anyway, if they bring their first lab up and running 14:35:12 Maybe we should schedule a separate meeting with them - after they are approved they passed Milestone C. 14:35:37 arm lab? arm will provide that this yes? 14:35:38 it would help everyone since it is genesis, installers, test, infra projects 14:35:50 aricg: yes. 14:35:57 everyone will need to get feedback from there 14:36:03 so it is not actually 2 months 14:36:15 if some issues are found in some projects 14:36:24 they need time to fix them if they agreed arm requirements 14:36:49 Fully agree. 14:37:11 So I suggest, we wait, whether they get Milestone C approval. 14:37:30 ok 14:37:31 Then we call for a meeting to understand their thinking. 14:38:07 #agree to meet with armband as soon as we have decision whether they are in B release 14:38:19 #topic AoB 14:38:29 (and then releng!) 14:39:00 #chair fdegir 14:39:00 Current chairs: fdegir uli-k 14:39:19 #info moving on to releng. 14:39:48 #topic Releng Brahmaputra Milestone-C Status 14:40:06 #info Milestone-C status report has been sent out 14:40:31 #info There are definitely invisible/secondary dependencies which will surface later on 14:40:53 #info Combinations of things will also make things interesting 14:41:13 #topic Releng AOB 14:41:29 aricg morgan_orange trozet jose_lausuch MatthewLi: do you want to add anything? 14:42:10 most of the people are busy with SR1 so not much to report I assume 14:42:36 nothing more for releng 14:42:50 no 14:42:55 no 14:42:55 nothing from me 14:43:19 sorry, didnt follow much 14:43:25 we are testing currently odl on foreman 14:43:47 jose_lausuch: thx 14:43:56 nothing from me 14:44:22 thx to all 14:44:43 back to you uli-k 14:45:12 OK. Thanks everybody then for the meeting! 14:45:22 Talk to you next week! 14:45:38 #endmeeting