15:00:10 <frankbrockners> #startmeeting OPNFV Arno SR1 daily release readiness check in
15:00:10 <collabot> Meeting started Wed Sep 30 15:00:10 2015 UTC.  The chair is frankbrockners. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:00:10 <collabot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic.
15:00:10 <collabot> The meeting name has been set to 'opnfv_arno_sr1_daily_release_readiness_check_in'
15:00:17 <frankbrockners> #info Frank Brockners
15:00:26 <jose_lausuch> #info Jose Lausuch
15:00:31 <[1]JonasB> #info JonasBjurel
15:00:44 <pbandzi_> #info Peter Bandzi
15:01:41 <frankbrockners> #info things look really good by now - last 3 Fuel and last 6 Foreman/quickstack deploys worked fine
15:01:49 <fdegir> #info Fatih Degirmenci
15:02:03 <jose_lausuch> yes, it looks promising
15:02:17 <jose_lausuch> foreman is sunny
15:02:19 <jose_lausuch> fuel almost
15:02:29 <frankbrockners> what is missing for fuel?
15:02:40 <jose_lausuch> 2 more successful runs to get the "sun" :)
15:02:47 <frankbrockners> ah ok
15:03:12 <frankbrockners> what else is missing - are we complete on testdocumentation (wiki finalized)?
15:03:30 <s_berg> #info Stefan Berg
15:03:38 <narindergupta> #info Narinder Gupta
15:04:14 <frankbrockners> jose_lausuch - is the test results wiki final (do we have a link to be included in the release docs)?
15:04:40 <jose_lausuch> functest still need to arrange the stable-arno branch
15:04:47 <jose_lausuch> frankbrockners: yes, I updated it yesterday
15:04:50 <jose_lausuch> you mean the table with results?
15:04:59 <trozet> #info Tim Rozet
15:05:06 <frankbrockners> jose_lausuch - yes
15:05:12 <jose_lausuch> yes, its done
15:05:20 <frankbrockners> great - thanks
15:05:28 <jose_lausuch> trozet: I updated the links so that they point to stable-arno jobs, and not master
15:05:53 <frankbrockners> are the links included in the release docs?
15:06:25 <jose_lausuch> trozet: you wanted to include that link, right?
15:06:51 <trozet> jose_lausuch: I think Jonas1 and I both wanted to include the link in our release notes
15:06:57 <trozet> for test results
15:06:59 <jose_lausuch> ok
15:07:09 <trozet> we need a revision link
15:07:25 <trozet> the only way i have found to do that is to create a newer revision, then the revision link shows up in older history ;)
15:08:39 <morgan_orange> #info Morgan Richomme
15:09:01 <frankbrockners> how about we create share the link here?
15:09:11 <jose_lausuch> I can do it now
15:09:13 <jose_lausuch> 1 seg
15:09:38 <jose_lausuch> https://wiki.opnfv.org/functest_release_1?rev=1443560015
15:10:22 <frankbrockners> #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/functest_release_1?rev=1443560015
15:10:40 <frankbrockners> #info link of test results will be included in release notes
15:10:55 <frankbrockners> what other remaining tasks do we have open? anything?
15:11:46 <jose_lausuch> problem of that link is that it doesnt point to the table
15:12:03 <jose_lausuch> and adding this "&#arno_sr0_vs_sr1" doesnt help
15:12:05 <[1]JonasB> Is this now the link to use in the release notes?
15:12:09 <trozet> its ok not to point ot hte table
15:12:11 <trozet> people can scroll
15:12:12 <trozet> lol
15:12:27 <frankbrockners> you can include https://wiki.opnfv.org/functest_release_1?rev=1443560015#arno_sr0_vs_sr1 if you want the table
15:12:31 <jose_lausuch> then you should mention "look at the table Arno SR0 vs SR1" lol
15:12:42 <jose_lausuch> ah ya
15:12:43 <jose_lausuch> great
15:12:44 <jose_lausuch> that worked
15:12:47 <morgan_orange> other wise we create a dedicated page
15:12:49 <jose_lausuch> #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/functest_release_1?rev=1443560015#arno_sr0_vs_sr1
15:13:05 <jose_lausuch> use that link
15:13:32 <frankbrockners> on the earlier question - is there anything that is missing to call things "complete"?
15:13:55 <jose_lausuch> morgan_orange: cherrypicking to stable-arno?
15:14:07 <morgan_orange> we will merge
15:14:38 <jose_lausuch> thats it from our side, I think
15:14:54 <morgan_orange> I think trozet merged also on fuel
15:15:01 <morgan_orange> we will do the same
15:15:14 <s_berg> jose_lausuch: One quick Q on the link you pasted. "Arno stable fuel not run (deploy failed)"?
15:15:26 <frankbrockners> jose_lausuch: let me understand the "cherrylicking" statement... is test still using master and not arno-stable?
15:15:50 <morgan_orange> yes
15:15:53 <jose_lausuch> s_berg: where?
15:16:00 <frankbrockners> s_berg: good point
15:16:07 <s_berg> "Arno SR1 29/9/2015" heading
15:16:18 <s_berg> But you've tested on stable/arno?
15:16:19 <frankbrockners> yesterday we agreed that the page should only contain stable-arno and not master results
15:16:30 <frankbrockners> master would be confusing
15:16:40 <s_berg> Yes, I think so.
15:16:42 <frankbrockners> jose_lausuch - could you fix and provide a new link
15:16:57 <jose_lausuch> morgan_orange: I think the best is to create a new wiki for these results
15:17:23 <jose_lausuch> with the last table only
15:17:27 <morgan_orange> jose_lausuch:  yep
15:17:29 <morgan_orange> I do that right now
15:17:39 <frankbrockners> thanks morgan_orange
15:17:42 <jose_lausuch> ok
15:18:23 <jose_lausuch> here?  https://wiki.opnfv.org/functest_release_1/arno_sr0_vs_sr1
15:19:43 <frankbrockners> ok - assuming that we get 3 more successful deploys of fuel by tomorrow: should we officially release tomorrow (i.e. label the release)?
15:20:09 * s_berg thinks so.
15:20:23 <trozet> so jose_lausuch will email out the permalink to use for release notes?
15:20:24 <s_berg> Five successful runs in a row.
15:20:40 <jose_lausuch> morgan_orange: if you update the page can you send out the link when you are done?
15:20:44 <s_berg> Good weather in jenkins, and all should be well then.
15:20:45 <morgan_orange> 5 minutes
15:20:51 <[1]JonasB> +1 The sun is the criteria!
15:21:25 <frankbrockners> trozet: r u ok as well?
15:21:49 <trozet> frankbrockners: let me check the weather
15:21:50 <jose_lausuch> +1 for sunny jobs (5 successful iterations)
15:22:27 <frankbrockners> foreman/quickstack already had 6 successful runs in a row
15:22:31 <trozet> frankbrockners: its been sunny in jenkins for 6 iterations, but raining in Raleigh the last 4 days
15:22:49 <frankbrockners> trozet: come to Germany ;-)
15:22:54 <s_berg> What luck that it isn't the other way around then. ;)
15:23:12 <[1]JonasB> How many successful runs for Fuel?
15:23:18 <frankbrockners> 3
15:23:25 <trozet> :)
15:23:31 <s_berg> Just kicked of the fourth.
15:23:32 <jose_lausuch> if the criteria was the sun in Germany... we'd never deliver :p
15:23:41 <frankbrockners> haha
15:23:47 <trozet> LOL
15:23:54 <s_berg> jose_lausuch: If we were working in Germany we wouldn't care, we'd have good beer!
15:24:13 <jose_lausuch> hahaha thats right
15:24:35 <frankbrockners> ok - if the sun shines tomorrow morning - should I go ahead and label genesis - or do you want to do another checkpoint tomorrow and we do it "jointly"
15:25:16 <[1]JonasB> So should we merge the releasnotes now with the link above and hope everything stays good?
15:25:38 <frankbrockners> [1]JonasB - IMHO it is worth a try
15:25:43 <[1]JonasB> ;-)
15:26:10 <frankbrockners> trozet - could you also merge the release notes - once morgan_orange has the final link available
15:26:29 <morgan_orange> https://wiki.opnfv.org/arno_sr1_result_page?rev=1443626728
15:27:01 <trozet> ty morgan_orange
15:27:15 <frankbrockners> thanks - looks good
15:27:23 <jose_lausuch> clearer now :)
15:27:23 <[1]JonasB> morgan_orange: Can you send the link to me and trozet directly and not through spam chennel
15:27:56 <jose_lausuch> I just did Jonas1
15:28:04 <jose_lausuch> or [1]JonasB
15:28:20 <frankbrockners> #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/functest_release_1?rev=1443560015#arno_sr0_vs_sr1 final rev of the test link that will be included in the release notes
15:28:32 <[1]JonasB> jose_lausuch: Thanks
15:28:50 <frankbrockners> #info if all deploys (fuel and foreman) are "sunny" tomorrow (5+ successful deploys) we are ready for release
15:29:05 <jose_lausuch> np
15:29:45 <frankbrockners> on my earlier question: when should we do the labeling? I'm ok to label genesis tomorrow morning (assuming a sunny day) - and then also tell everyone else.
15:30:09 <frankbrockners> Or we can do it jointly over IRC in afternoon time CET / morning hours EST/PST
15:30:17 <frankbrockners> any preference?
15:31:59 <fdegir> afternoon sounds fine
15:32:16 <frankbrockners> ok - time preference?
15:32:18 <trozet> i dont have a preference
15:32:28 <[1]JonasB> Neither do I
15:32:33 <fdegir> around 14 so US people could be around
15:32:43 <fdegir> 12 UTC?
15:33:08 <frankbrockners> that is a bit early for US....
15:33:16 <fdegir> since we will/should have the SHA1s for all the projects by tomorrow morning
15:33:34 <fdegir> assuming all the docs, etc updates checked in
15:34:04 <frankbrockners> how about 14 UTC = 7am PDT?
15:34:23 <[1]JonasB> 4 CET
15:34:28 <frankbrockners> yes
15:34:47 <frankbrockners> let's try that
15:35:10 <frankbrockners> let's synch on opnfv-bgs and see whether we're really ready
15:35:21 <jose_lausuch> sorry, need to go
15:35:21 <jose_lausuch> bye
15:35:44 <frankbrockners> I'll send out another invite for 4pm CET tomorrow (=7am PDT = 2pm UTC)
15:35:51 <frankbrockners> thanks guys...
15:35:52 <morgan_orange> ok
15:36:11 <frankbrockners> let's hope for a sunny day tomorrow
15:36:15 <frankbrockners> #endmeeting