================================== #opnfv-meeting: Weekly TSC meeting ================================== Meeting started by tallgren at 13:59:24 UTC. The full logs are available at http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-meeting/2017/opnfv-meeting.2017-05-30-13.59.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * Tapio Tallgren (tallgren, 14:00:12) * Morgan Richomme (IRC only) (morgan_orange, 14:00:16) * Uli (uli-k, 14:00:17) * hongbo (hongbo2839, 14:00:18) * rprakas (rprakash, 14:00:22) * Frank Brockners (frankbrockners, 14:00:29) * Bin Hu (bh526r, 14:00:35) * Fatih Degirmenci (fdegir, 14:00:40) * Carlos Goncalves (proxy for Xavier Costa) (cgoncalves, 14:00:45) * Jack Morgan (jmorgan1, 14:00:48) * Brian Skerry (bjskerry, 14:01:03) * Tim Irnich (timirnich, 14:01:16) * approval of previous minutes (rpaik, 14:02:23) * Rossella Sblendido (rossella_, 14:02:38) * no comments thus previous minutes approved (rpaik, 14:02:40) * Mark Beierl (proxy for Edgar StPierre) (mbeierl, 14:02:42) * Bryan Sullivan (bryan_att, 14:03:02) * no other agenda topics suggested (rpaik, 14:03:34) * annual award reminder (rpaik, 14:03:43) * Annual awards voting ends tomorrow (tallgren, 14:04:02) * Danube/Euphrates planning (rpaik, 14:05:12) * Dave Neary (dneary, 14:05:59) * Trevor Cooper (trevor_intel_, 14:06:20) * dmcbride notes that there's a full compliance on MS2 for Euphrates (with Escalator dropping out) (rpaik, 14:06:25) * MS3 (installer integration) is today and dmcbride will be following up with installer teams (rpaik, 14:07:01) * daily meetings will start for Danube 3.0 (rpaik, 14:07:24) * Danube 3 is coming out on June 8th. It is the last Danube release (tallgren, 14:07:27) * dmcbride reviewed 3 sub-milestones for MS3 and noted that there's no change to the overall release schedule (rpaik, 14:10:23) * 3.0 is OpenStack integration + nosdn + Functest support for health check (rpaik, 14:11:29) * 3.1 is installers passing health check (rpaik, 14:12:16) * 3.2 is deploying integrated SDN scenario and passing health check (rpaik, 14:12:52) * MS4 will be "test framework ready" (rpaik, 14:15:09) * for SDN controllers, it's up to the team to deploy which controller is deployed (rpaik, 14:17:31) * discussion on adding a similar milestone for Kubernetes (rpaik, 14:19:23) * fuqiao (fuqiao, 14:20:03) * suggestion to change OpenStack/Kubernetes to VIM (rpaik, 14:20:23) * Kubernetes does not work with Functest at the moment but this is planned within the next two weeks (tallgren, 14:21:05) * So the Functest+Kubernetes integration will be ready by MS4 (Test case ready) (tallgren, 14:21:40) * Julien (Julien-zte, 14:25:37) * 3.0 is OpenStack integration + nosdn + Functest support for health check/3.1 is installers passing health check/3.2 is deploying integrated SDN scenario and passing health check (rpaik, 14:26:24) * with 2-3 weeks in between each milestone (mbeierl, 14:27:05) * 3.0 is OpenStack integration + nosdn/no feature + Functest support for health check (rpaik, 14:27:38) * VOTE: Voted on "does the TSC approve additional sub-milestones for Milestone 3?" Results are, 0: 1, +1: 16 (rpaik, 14:28:34) * LINK: https://wiki.opnfv.org/download/attachments/2925933/MS3%20MS4%20changes.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1496154486772&api=v2 (dmcbride, 14:28:44) * Dovetail discussion/approval (rpaik, 14:28:59) * Wenjing reviewed the overall CVP process and went over files for test cases (e.g. for BGPVPN) (rpaik, 14:33:34) * It is not decided at the moment whether all tests need to pass for certification (tallgren, 14:34:13) * there is still no consensus on optional test cases (whether one needs to pass optional test cases or not) (rpaik, 14:34:28) * ACTION: trevor_intel_ and DoveTail team, add a description on what level of test case passing should be enough to pass the CVP into to the addendum for Danube. :) (ChrisPriceAB, 14:34:51) * there are also docs for test case requirements, user documentation, and Danube addendum (rpaik, 14:36:50) * LINK: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/dovetail/Dovetail+Documentation+for+Review (rpaik, 14:37:15) * test results will be captured in testresults.opnfv.org (rpaik, 14:38:19) * The CVP program will be announced (but not launched) in the Summit (tallgren, 14:40:07) * CVP will be introduced at the upcoming Summit (i.e. our intent), but this will not be an official launch (rpaik, 14:40:09) * frankbrockners asked if all mandatory tests are subset of OpenStack tests (as all tests in IPV6, HA, BGPVPN are optional) (rpaik, 14:43:11) * dneary notes that focus has been on documentation prior to test cases becoming mandatory (rpaik, 14:46:16) * discussion if there's a need to define a "bar" that is actually testing OPNFV (rpaik, 14:50:17) * decision on mandatory/optional tests were made by individual project teams (rpaik, 14:52:16) * rosella asks what the process for determining mandatory or optional test cases is. (ChrisPriceAB, 14:52:17) * Tim gives an example of why he selected to be optional, due to not all NFVi will support SDNVPN features. At this time a criteria for selection has not yet been documented. (ChrisPriceAB, 14:53:25) * tallgren asks if we need an optional section to the testing at this time. As there are very few optional test cases at this time. (ChrisPriceAB, 14:55:31) * rpaik asks what the TSC is being asked for today (ChrisPriceAB, 14:59:26) * frankbrockners adds that the comments from the TSC indicate DoveTail is heading in the right direction however it is too early approve the scope as a program. (ChrisPriceAB, 15:00:43) * timirnich asks that the TSC provides input to the project as to what tests would be valuable to be added to the test suites for the CVP (ChrisPriceAB, 15:01:13) * frankbrockers states that a good starting point would be to ensure we evaluate the key features provided as market messages for any given release. (ChrisPriceAB, 15:02:04) * frankbrockners adds that key ingredients of the release should be tested in the CVP (rpaik, 15:02:06) * timirnich states items like robustness are key for OPNFV, beyond what the existing refstack test cases provide. (ChrisPriceAB, 15:02:50) Meeting ended at 15:05:53 UTC. Action items, by person ----------------------- * trevor_intel_ * trevor_intel_ and DoveTail team, add a description on what level of test case passing should be enough to pass the CVP into to the addendum for Danube. :) People present (lines said) --------------------------- * rpaik (38) * tallgren (12) * collabot` (12) * ChrisPriceAB (10) * jmorgan1 (5) * cgoncalves (4) * mbeierl (4) * morgan_orange (3) * hongbo2839 (3) * dneary (2) * bh526r (2) * rossella_ (2) * bjskerry (2) * fuqiao (2) * fdegir (2) * frankbrockners (2) * uli-k (2) * Julien-zte (2) * timirnich (2) * bryan_att (2) * trevor_intel_ (1) * dmcbride (1) * rprakash (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4