================================ #opnfv-meeting: Infra WG Meeting ================================ Meeting started by fdegir at 16:02:53 UTC. The full logs are available at http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-meeting/2017/opnfv-meeting.2017-12-18-16.02.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * Joe Kidder (joekidder, 16:04:15) * Aric Gardner (aricg, 16:04:16) * David McBride (dmcbride, 16:04:30) * Fatih Degirmenci (fdegir, 16:04:31) * Tianwei Wu (hw_wutianwei, 16:04:45) * LINK: Agenda - https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/INF/Infra+Working+Group (jmorgan1, 16:04:56) * David spoke with OpenStack Release project about topic - they use CI to judge if something needs to be release or not (jmorgan1, 16:09:13) * In order for basic promotion to work, we must ensure when we test scenarios, we only change the scenario (fdegir, 16:10:54) * Meaning that everything else should be frozen; test fw/cases, infra, etc (fdegir, 16:11:10) * Apart from this, we need a way to find out which scenario is impacted by certain change in order to run test that scenario (fdegir, 16:11:31) * CI Evolution was proposed/approved long before XCI was even created (fdegir, 16:11:48) * And due to us failing to make CI Evolution real, we started XCI to show that that's the way (fdegir, 16:12:15) * A basic schemet could be (fdegir, 16:13:17) * - patchset verification: healthcheck (fdegir, 16:13:30) * - post merge: smoke (?) (fdegir, 16:13:41) * - daily: functest + yardstick (fdegir, 16:13:49) * - weekly: performance/stress/etc. (fdegir, 16:14:02) * Each of these stages promoting scenarios to the next one or demoting (fdegir, 16:14:23) * Test WG should come up with the scope for the test loops; what tests should be used where (fdegir, 16:15:11) * Promotion is not only for scenarios; test projects should also have promotion to enable certain test cases that are used for testing scenarios (fdegir, 16:16:11) * LINK: Pharos Spec etherpad - https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/Pharos_Specification2.0 (jmorgan1, 16:19:10) * Compass: https://build.opnfv.org/ci/label/compass-baremetal/ (fdegir, 16:23:37) * Fuel: https://build.opnfv.org/ci/label/fuel-baremetal/ (fdegir, 16:23:47) * Joid: https://build.opnfv.org/ci/label/joid-baremetal/ (fdegir, 16:23:56) * Daisy: https://build.opnfv.org/ci/label/daisy-baremetal/ (fdegir, 16:24:05) * Apex: https://build.opnfv.org/ci/label/apex-baremetal-master/ and https://build.opnfv.org/ci/label/apex-baremetal-euphrates/ (fdegir, 16:24:27) * MCP/Fuel (fdegir, 16:25:00) * Armband: https://build.opnfv.org/ci/label/armband-baremetal/ (bramwelt, 16:25:23) * huawei-pod12 will connect jenkins this week (hw_wutianwei, 16:26:42) * each installer has two CI POD except Compass which has three and Fuel which has two POD per arch (jmorgan1, 16:30:45) * discussion on patch - https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/48755 (jmorgan1, 16:31:54) * who owns making sure a CI POD is listed in the test DB? (jmorgan1, 16:34:09) * once a resource is approved as CI project, adding the permission to push results to test DB should be done by Test WG (jmorgan1, 16:35:54) * ACTION: bramwelt will work on documenting the process for future releases (jmorgan1, 16:36:47) * INFRA-195 request for StorPerf POD - looking for baremetal POD (jmorgan1, 16:40:56) * will look at this after the holidays to help StorPerf project find hardware resources (jmorgan1, 16:42:00) * LINK: https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/48413/ (bramwelt, 16:43:27) * ACTION: bramwelt to work with LF Releng to resolve this discussion (jmorgan1, 16:46:29) * bramwelt suggests use Jenkins as the default (jmorgan1, 16:59:09) * jmorgan1 thinks that if Jenkins is used then Jenkins needs to be better monitored for accuracy (jmorgan1, 17:00:31) * Reminder that we won't be meeting next two weeks and next meeting is January 9th (jmorgan1, 17:02:03) * Reminder that we won't be meeting next two weeks and next meeting is January 8th (jmorgan1, 17:02:35) Meeting ended at 17:03:26 UTC. Action items, by person ----------------------- * bramwelt * bramwelt will work on documenting the process for future releases * bramwelt to work with LF Releng to resolve this discussion People present (lines said) --------------------------- * fdegir (37) * jmorgan1 (26) * collabot (3) * dmcbride (3) * aricg (2) * bramwelt (2) * hw_wutianwei (2) * joekidder (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4