===================================================== #opnfv-meeting: Weekly Technical Discuss Meeting #173 ===================================================== Meeting started by jentoio at 13:02:03 UTC. The full logs are available at http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-meeting/2020/opnfv-meeting.2020-05-04-13.02.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * Roll Call (jentoio, 13:02:12) * Jack Morgan (jentoio, 13:02:29) * Trevor Cooper (jentoio, 13:03:23) * Al Morton (jentoio, 13:03:40) * Sridhar Rao (jentoio, 13:03:55) * Lincoln Lavoie (jentoio, 13:04:25) * Jim Baker (jentoio, 13:04:51) * Memhet (jentoio, 13:06:11) * James Gu (jentoio, 13:08:59) * Liang Chen (jentoio, 13:10:33) * Sridhar Rao (SRao, 13:11:05) * discussion on CIRV (jentoio, 13:11:09) * Jack shared his perspective from joining CNTT RI/RC meetings (jentoio, 13:11:37) * this included how github issues include too many items with no definition of done (jentoio, 13:20:53) * nobody from CNTT actually doing something in OPNFV so not how sure how to integrate (jentoio, 13:21:46) * also there is a lack of flushing out of topics within opnfv like we have had in the past (jentoio, 13:22:34) * question is how we go from cntt to opnfv? how do we see this happening? (jentoio, 13:23:16) * what is the end game? OVP? how do we integrate CNTT deliverables into OPNFV? (jentoio, 13:24:10) * SRao mentions that we can categorize requirements into buckets and approach them this way. (jentoio, 13:25:43) * SRao shared the work he did on the installer cookbook over the past few months (jentoio, 13:27:02) * Georg Kunz (jentoio, 13:28:12) * discussion on specifics on the cookbook - who and how it should be created and how to do bring that back into opnfv (jentoio, 13:34:48) * Liang Chen mentions that operators already have common descriptor file and don't want to have a common one nor re-implement something (jentoio, 13:38:39) * Liang has committed some tooling for common descriptor file and hardware validation tool, etc (jentoio, 13:41:16) * Trevor mentions that there should be a clear distinction between implementation details (OPNFV) and higher level specifications (CNTT) but CNTT is covering both areas (jentoio, 13:51:49) * discussion included how to define what OPNFV does and what CNTT does - needs to be clear line in the sand (jentoio, 14:03:24) * all agreed that change is needed so next steps in the continue the discussion in this meeting next week (jentoio, 14:04:55) * Jack will send out meeting minutes and announcement to a wider audience in both OPNFV and CNTT (jentoio, 14:05:56) Meeting ended at 14:06:10 UTC. People present (lines said) --------------------------- * jentoio (29) * collab-meetbot (3) * SRao (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4