===================================================== #opnfv-meeting: Weekly Technical Discuss Meeting #175 ===================================================== Meeting started by jentoio at 12:59:41 UTC. The full logs are available at http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-meeting/2020/opnfv-meeting.2020-05-18-12.59.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * Roll Call (jentoio, 12:59:47) * james Gu (jentoio, 13:02:59) * Jack Morgan (jentoio, 13:03:03) * Sunku Ranganath (jentoio, 13:03:15) * Cedric Ollivier (jentoio, 13:03:29) * Jim Baker (jentoio, 13:03:37) * Al Morton (jentoio, 13:03:47) * Liang Chen (jentoio, 13:04:19) * Georg Kunz (jentoio, 13:04:50) * CNTT Collaboration (jentoio, 13:05:41) * discussion identified that CNTT requirements have items that are not testable or realistic and that they just define a goal (jentoio, 14:02:36) * this fact isn't presented at during the process and might not be realized until requirement is received (jentoio, 14:03:48) * in addition, we don't have requirement gathering model within CNTT that allows for this feedback - for example, a 3 week sprint or other regular schedule where you can participate to flush them out. One is just required to attend every meeting (jentoio, 14:05:29) * Cedric mentions that feedback loop exists between CNTT/OPNFV in that CNTT provide requirement and eventually consume results of implementation (jentoio, 14:07:12) * a requirements working group could fill this need as a bridge between requirements (CNTT) and OPNFV projects but details need to be figured out (jentoio, 14:08:33) * otherwise, OPNFV folks have to work first in the CNTT streams while requirements are gatherd/discussed and then work to implement them in an OPNFV project (jentoio, 14:09:44) * LINK: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/INF/CNTT+Collaboration (jentoio, 14:11:50) Meeting ended at 14:11:59 UTC. People present (lines said) --------------------------- * jentoio (22) * collab-meetbot (4) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4