=====================================================
#opnfv-meeting: Weekly Technical Discuss Meeting #177
=====================================================


Meeting started by jentoio at 12:59:29 UTC.  The full logs are available
at
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-meeting/2020/opnfv-meeting.2020-06-08-12.59.log.html
.



Meeting summary
---------------

* Roll Call  (jentoio, 12:59:38)
  * David McBride  (jentoio, 12:59:55)
  * Jack Morgan  (jentoio, 13:00:03)
  * Cedric Ollivier  (jentoio, 13:00:30)
  * Jim Baker  (jentoio, 13:00:38)
  * Parth Yadav  (jentoio, 13:01:27)
  * Ildiko Vancsa  (jentoio, 13:02:08)
  * Liang Chen  (jentoio, 13:03:01)
  * Al Morton  (jentoio, 13:04:36)
  * Bob Monkman  (jentoio, 13:05:21)
  * Brandon Wick  (jentoio, 13:06:57)

* OPNFV Release Process  (jentoio, 13:07:03)
  * James Gu  (jentoio, 13:07:50)
  * dmcbride presented his slides on the current effort to
    improve/update the process  (jentoio, 13:09:32)
  * considerations were the first item discussed which include an update
    template, consolidated milestones, incorporate requirements, etc
    (jentoio, 13:11:59)
  * assumptions for the new process were presented  (jentoio, 13:12:52)
  * a high level overview came next for example release proposal is a
    meta-release (release of releases),  (jentoio, 13:14:40)
  * OPNFV Level Requirements Planning - a new component in the proposal
    (jentoio, 13:15:49)
  * this component includes a work group to gather and vet requirements
    (jentoio, 13:16:55)
  * what does vetting mean? was defined in the next slide  (jentoio,
    13:19:10)
  * PTL of TSC approved requirements would need approval of the project
    PTL involved in the requirement  (jentoio, 13:19:50)
  * requirement work group / subcommittee was presented in detail next
    (jentoio, 13:21:30)
  * requirements owner responsibility was defined after looking at a
    slide on the workflow of a requirement  (jentoio, 13:25:39)
  * project release plans would include a template, reviewed and
    approved, documented in JIRA, assigned to the release  (jentoio,
    13:27:39)
  * integrated vs non-integrated projects were defined (integrated means
    related to CNTT work) and process for both presented  (jentoio,
    13:29:17)
  * self-release process was defined in the next slide as was integrated
    and non-integrated release processes  (jentoio, 13:31:11)
  * documentation was presented as it has been discussed extensively in
    previous meetings  (jentoio, 13:32:37)
  * integrated projects and gating process for defined next  (jentoio,
    13:33:10)
  * milestones for the updated release process was defined next
    (jentoio, 13:34:02)
  * Sridhar Rao  (jentoio, 13:34:58)
  * a Q/A section was included in the proposal which explained some
    issues that have come up in previous discussions  (jentoio,
    13:41:01)

* marketing message - how is it impacted by this proposal?  (jentoio,
  13:52:02)
  * concerns came up during discussion - who is the requirement owner
    within CNTT? (Jim) and overall concerns with current working CNTT
    model (cedric)  (jentoio, 13:54:35)
  * concerns for current working CNTT model include lack of CNTT
    supplied resources, lack of lifecycle knowledge of CNTT and overall
    integration process  (jentoio, 13:56:03)
  * marketing message lacks a step in the process to report back to TSC
    prior to release to get feedback  (jentoio, 13:56:44)
  * next steps to define the next level details in the OPNFV Release
    Meeting  (jentoio, 14:03:18)



Meeting ended at 14:04:41 UTC.



People present (lines said)
---------------------------

* jentoio (38)
* collab-meetbot (3)



Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4