========================================
#opnfv-netready: NetReady weekly meeting
========================================


Meeting started by georgk at 16:01:12 UTC.  The full logs are available
at
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-netready/2016/opnfv-netready.2016-07-12-16.01.log.html
.



Meeting summary
---------------

* roll call  (georgk, 16:01:27)
  * Georg Kunz  (georgk, 16:01:31)
  * Csatari Gergely  (csatari, 16:04:14)
  * The current integration point of Gluon to Nova is deprecated.
    (csatari, 16:05:36)
  * Not in Nova, but in Neutron.  (csatari, 16:06:29)
  * One option to have a specific Gluon specific port type.  (csatari,
    16:07:10)
  * Other option is to keep using the current method and try to keep the
    method alive.  (csatari, 16:07:35)
  * Bin Hu  (bin_, 16:11:53)
  * bin points out that Neutron devs understand our requirements
    (georgk, 16:14:06)
  * we need an extension mechanism for the northbound API  (georgk,
    16:14:55)
  * it is important to realize that new use cases and serivces might
    come up next year  (georgk, 16:16:00)
  * how can we create a framework that allows us to quickly create and
    deploy new services  (georgk, 16:16:36)
  * use cases in NetReady are very specific right now  (georgk,
    16:21:27)
  * bin stresses that we need to show the generic need for a new
    framework  (georgk, 16:21:50)
  * we need to address both levels of abstraction: current challenges
    based on today's use cases and a framerwork for addressing future
    use cases  (georgk, 16:29:43)
  * ACTION: bin_ will add a high level argumentation for a generic
    framework (e.g., generic ports) to the document  (georgk, 16:31:21)
  * reviews for the pending patchsets are needed  (georgk, 16:32:55)
  * we need to make the distinction between the L3VPN functionality and
    the support for multiple backends clearer in the doc  (georgk,
    16:37:17)
  * ACTION: bin_ will contribute some text on the nbeed for
    multi-backend support  (georgk, 16:37:46)
  * georgk asked tomhamb to review the port abstraction use case
    (georgk, 16:42:20)

* prepartion of the Gluon meeting  (georgk, 16:43:42)
  * PTL election should be done via  the OpenStack mailing list as we
    might not have access to the official voting system  (georgk,
    16:47:46)
  * Larry Lamers  (ljlamers_, 16:48:56)
  * the Gluon meeting will be IRC only  (georgk, 16:51:08)
  * everybody should make up their mind if we can release something in
    Newton  (georgk, 16:55:40)



Meeting ended at 16:57:25 UTC.



Action items, by person
-----------------------

* bin_
  * bin_ will add a high level argumentation for a generic framework
    (e.g., generic ports) to the document
  * bin_ will contribute some text on the nbeed for multi-backend
    support



People present (lines said)
---------------------------

* georgk (20)
* csatari (7)
* collabot (3)
* ljlamers_ (1)
* bin_ (1)



Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4