14:30:08 <debrascott> #startmeeting Brahmaputra Release Daily Standup
14:30:08 <collabot> Meeting started Tue Jan 26 14:30:08 2016 UTC.  The chair is debrascott. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:30:08 <collabot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic.
14:30:08 <collabot> The meeting name has been set to 'brahmaputra_release_daily_standup'
14:30:22 <debrascott> agenda same as yesterday
14:30:25 <debrascott> https://wiki.opnfv.org/releases/brahmaputra/minutes
14:30:35 <debrascott> #topic roll call
14:30:42 <bin_> #Bin Hu
14:30:48 <morgan_orange> #Morgan Richomme
14:30:51 <anac1> #info Ana Cunha
14:30:56 <morgan_orange> #info Morgan Richomme
14:30:57 <joekidder> #info Joe Kidder
14:31:00 <HKirksey> #info Heather Kirksey
14:31:02 <StuartMackie> #info Stuart Mackie
14:31:13 <ChrisPriceAB> #info Chris Price
14:31:31 <frankbrockners> #info Frank Brockners
14:31:36 <uli-k_> #info Uli Kleber
14:31:53 <bin_> #info Bin Hu
14:31:58 <fdegir> #info Fatih Degirmenci
14:32:48 <trozet> #info Tim Rozet
14:33:08 <debrascott> #topic install Deploy status
14:33:44 <debrascott> jonasb: fuel?
14:33:45 <uabjonb> #info Jonas Bjurel
14:35:08 <debrascott> uabjonb: fuel status?
14:36:25 <uabjonb> #info We have been struggeling with an autodeploy issue, hopefully solved now. Testing. Scenarios being rebased
14:37:35 <debrascott> #info: joid status per narindergupta: JOID deployed successfully on all three labs yesterday including the virtual deployment. Unfortunately functest had some issues yesterday which seems to be resolved today.
14:38:16 <debrascott> trozet: Apex?
14:38:49 <trozet> debrascott: #info fixing bugs, and radez is still working on contrail
14:39:21 <debrascott> OK, let’s move on then if nothing more from installers
14:39:43 <debrascott> #topic test status
14:39:53 <debrascott> morgan_orange: functest?
14:40:11 <debrascott> did morgan join us?
14:40:15 <morgan_orange> #functest regression yesterday night due to sdnvpn integration, fixed now
14:40:33 <morgan_orange> #info vPing/SSH Ok on manual tests with compass
14:40:42 <debrascott> ah there you are hiding from me ;)
14:41:12 <morgan_orange> #info troubleshoot of ODL suite on joid done, patch submitted (real correction should be done upstream...but rethinking of relation with ODL upstream test suite planned for release C)
14:41:27 <morgan_orange> #info integration of sdnvpn started
14:41:37 <morgan_orange> #info integration of promise also started
14:41:55 <morgan_orange> #info 2 testcases have been excluded from ONOS scenario
14:42:12 <morgan_orange> and that's it..
14:42:36 <debrascott> morgan_orange: which testcases? are they particular to an installer?
14:42:58 <morgan_orange> some are automatically specific odl => only with odl, onos only with onos
14:43:08 <morgan_orange> promise only with 2 installers
14:43:13 <morgan_orange> same for doctor only 1 scenario
14:43:22 <morgan_orange> we implemented a mechanism to manage such dependencies
14:43:28 <ChrisPriceAB> QQ is vPing working on all scenario's now?
14:43:30 <morgan_orange> other testcases shall be runnable anywhere
14:43:40 <morgan_orange> ChrisPriceAB: not yet
14:43:53 <ChrisPriceAB> ok, details?
14:43:55 <morgan_orange> we defined 2 vPING: vPing SSH and vPing userdata/cloudinit
14:44:16 <morgan_orange> https://wiki.opnfv.org/vping_brahmaputra_page
14:44:29 <morgan_orange> vPing/SSH shall be OK now on compass (wait for next run)
14:44:47 <morgan_orange> table to be updated for apex as well I think
14:45:23 <morgan_orange> http://testresults.opnfv.org/testapi/dashboard?project=functest&case=vPing&installer=apex
14:45:33 <morgan_orange> and you can change the installer
14:46:03 <morgan_orange> wait for the test dashboard of LF...
14:46:38 <debrascott> anac1: yardstick?
14:46:44 <anac1> #info first successful run with joid yesterday (os scenario), fails on odl scenario
14:47:14 <debrascott> anac1: congrats! good progress
14:47:29 <debrascott> anything else?
14:47:30 <anac1> #info on-going code writing for a patch for workaround for odl scenario - reamins to be tested on the labs
14:47:46 <anac1> #info on-going work for grafana dashboard and documentation
14:48:00 <debrascott> anac1: does that mean you found root cause to odl scenario issues?
14:48:00 <anac1> #info started to document results for hs
14:48:03 <anac1> ha*
14:48:27 <anac1> debrascott: first we test, no promises
14:48:48 <debrascott> experiment then, i get it
14:49:24 <anac1> ok, that's all for me
14:50:24 <ChrisPriceAB> #topic project status
14:50:44 <debrascott> #topic project status
14:51:20 <debrascott> any projects have additional status to add today?
14:51:52 <debrascott> trozet: question on Apex scenarios
14:52:10 <trozet> debrascott: sure
14:52:12 <debrascott> trozet are there any that remain to have jobs built in Jenkins
14:52:21 <morgan_orange> 1 question
14:52:45 <debrascott> morgan_orange: yes?
14:52:54 <trozet> debrascott: the jobs are all there.  We were looking at sdnvpn, which was not originally on our radar, but due to time, it will probably be in SR1
14:53:00 <morgan_orange> on the scenario I saw that all the installers follow the rules shared on the wiki
14:53:16 <morgan_orange> but I saw new apex job and it is mentioned opencontrail where it is ocl for the others
14:53:36 <morgan_orange> and as we test the scenario to see if it is runnable or not, it would be great to have only 1 name for the same thing
14:53:43 <morgan_orange> compass and joid use ocl
14:53:45 <StuartMackie> Yes - that's a typo on the wiki. I'll fix
14:53:46 <morgan_orange> apex opencontrail
14:54:08 <morgan_orange> it is not only a wiki stuff because we can see it on the jenkins job
14:54:14 <debrascott> trozet: how many scenarios are there total for Apex?
14:54:17 <fdegir> StuartMackie: what is typo?
14:54:30 <StuartMackie> opencontrail -> ocl
14:54:31 <morgan_orange> https://wiki.opnfv.org/brahmaputra_testing_page?&#scenario_naming
14:54:37 <fdegir> StuartMackie: ocl is intentional
14:54:43 <fdegir> StuartMackie: it is not a typo
14:54:52 <debrascott> trozet: how many pass, fail, have not been run with functest?
14:55:18 <trozet> debrascott: there are 5 scenarios including contrail, 4 work
14:55:29 <debrascott> trozet: thank you
14:55:35 <trozet> debrascott: well the tests cases are broken down by scenario
14:55:45 <trozet> debrascott: i think odl_l2 is about 90 pass/10 fail
14:56:08 <trozet> debrascott: onos is similar, odl_l3 is worse pass rate
14:56:38 <debrascott> ok, that makes sense. hard to read in Jenkins
14:56:43 <debrascott> for me anyway
14:56:53 <morgan_orange> trozet: http://testresults.opnfv.org/testapi/results?case=Tempest&installer=apex
14:57:17 <morgan_orange> debrascott: that is why we expected a test dahboard consuming the API
14:57:42 <morgan_orange> an update is in progress on LF because last demo 2 weeks ago was still referencing foreman...
14:57:47 <trozet> debrascott: i can send you the output of the test results for tmrw's daily, does that help?
14:57:54 <debrascott> morgan_orange: :) I sure hope so
14:58:14 <debrascott> trozet: yes, going to share high level with TSC in a few minutes
14:58:58 <debrascott> but update in tomorrow’s status will help
14:59:30 <morgan_orange> possible also to filter per scenario http://testresults.opnfv.org/testapi/results?case=Tempest&installer=apex&version=os-onos-nofeature-ha
14:59:32 <debrascott> OK top of the hour. let’s end here
14:59:45 <morgan_orange> http://testresults.opnfv.org/testapi/results?case=Tempest&installer=apex&version=os-odl_l3-nofeature-ha
14:59:45 <debrascott> #endmeeting