================================ #opnfv-release: Colorado Release ================================ Meeting started by dmcbride at 14:50:35 UTC. The full logs are available at http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-release/2016/opnfv-release.2016-05-10-14.50.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * Roll Call (ChrisPriceAB, 14:52:37) * David McBride (dmcbride, 14:53:13) * Chris Price (ChrisPriceAB, 14:53:29) * Sofia Wallin (sofiawallin, 15:00:24) * Bin Hu (bin_, 15:00:51) * Jose Lausuch (jose_lausuch, 15:02:19) * Bryan Sullivan (bryan_att, 15:03:17) * Ryota Mibu (r-mibu, 15:03:54) * Morgan Richomme (morgan_orange, 15:04:09) * Frank Brockners (frankbrockners, 15:07:22) * LINK: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/SWREL/Test+Release+Criteria (jose_lausuch, 15:09:22) * Billy O'Mahony (billyo, 15:09:37) * Jack Morgan (jmorgan1, 15:10:56) * Trevor Cooper (trevor_intel_, 15:11:21) * Mark Beierl (mbeierl, 15:11:31) * test release criteria (ChrisPriceAB, 15:14:38) * LINK: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/SWREL/Colorado+Testing+-+Discussion+and+Proposals (mbeierl, 15:18:27) * page listed above is for the test projects is to help us get to a common understanding of release criteria (mbeierl, 15:19:56) * release criteria maps to test projects, which execute which test cases (mbeierl, 15:20:21) * need clear demarcation to state when C is ready to go out (mbeierl, 15:20:49) * what scenarios are required and what hardware resources are required to fulfill the release testing (mbeierl, 15:21:50) * experience in B was that the time was getting out of realistic range, so this criteria is needed to help control the scope and duration of the test runs (mbeierl, 15:23:43) * this discussion is to continue in the next test projects meeting (mbeierl, 15:24:45) * about 40 projects have indicated C participation (mbeierl, 15:25:55) * should the test group have release go/no go authority? (mbeierl, 15:28:58) * Right now it is with TSC (mbeierl, 15:29:17) * test projects have input into the process (mbeierl, 15:29:39) * due to B release experience, David is calling for more discussion from the installer PTLs (mbeierl, 15:31:10) * What exactly is the release criteria has yet to be determined (mbeierl, 15:40:33) * intent was to have install, functest, yardstick, but this was not always possible (mbeierl, 15:41:27) * test case definition and implementation should be separate from test execution (mbeierl, 15:42:53) * David's intent is to go towards a JIRA scrub for C (mbeierl, 15:44:22) * can project leads create the Version "Colorado 1.0" in their respective JIRA projects? (mbeierl, 15:49:51) * tracking upstream projects is manual and a fair amount of replication (mbeierl, 15:50:27) * can JIRA be federated within Linux Foundation? (mbeierl, 15:50:45) * Pharos uses Components for sub-caterogizing (mbeierl, 15:51:47) * This does not help the replication problem though (mbeierl, 15:52:10) * Frank offering to collect info from other projects to see how to improve this (mbeierl, 15:52:31) * HTTP link is still not visible enough within JIRA (mbeierl, 15:53:03) * The copy/paste worked in B with the wiki, can it work for JIRA? (mbeierl, 15:54:30) * Federating our JIRA instances within LF will provide a way of resucing the copy/paste (mbeierl, 15:55:25) * Frank has offered to help drive improvements in this area, but if there is no interest, the existing methods will suffice for C (mbeierl, 15:56:11) * ACTION: Installer PTLs - Jose L indicates that FuncTest installer smoke tests have been fixed. Please integrate these tests with your CI and report on results. (dmcbride, 16:06:33) Meeting ended at 16:07:25 UTC. People present (lines said) --------------------------- * mbeierl (31) * jose_lausuch (13) * collabot` (8) * ChrisPriceAB (7) * dmcbride (6) * trozet (2) * frankbrockners (1) * trevor_intel_ (1) * bryan_att (1) * r-mibu (1) * jmorgan1 (1) * bin_ (1) * sofiawallin (1) * billyo (1) * morgan_orange (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4