02:30:54 #startmeeting OPNFV APAC Release 02:30:54 Meeting started Wed Jul 12 02:30:54 2017 UTC. The chair is dmcbride. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 02:30:54 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 02:30:54 The meeting name has been set to 'opnfv_apac_release' 02:31:03 #topic roll call 02:31:09 #info David McBride 02:31:32 #info Zhijiang Hu 02:31:55 Hi David 02:32:37 hi Zhijiang 02:33:01 did you see my email about Milestone 3.2? 02:33:11 I need your compliance evidence for Daisy 02:33:40 Oh, forgot to check mail... I will send infomation to you now 02:33:48 ok - great 02:34:20 latest result for Bare Metal 02:34:33 os-nosdn-nofeature-ha scenario (passed healthcheck) #link https://build.opnfv.org/ci/job/functest-daisy-baremetal-daily-master/7/console 02:34:46 os-odl_l3-nofeature-ha scenario (api_check failed) #link https://build.opnfv.org/ci/job/functest-daisy-baremetal-daily-master/8/console 02:34:54 latest result for Virtual 02:35:02 os-nosdn-nofeature-ha scenario (api_check failed) #link https://build.opnfv.org/ci/job/functest-daisy-virtual-daily-master/113/console 02:35:10 os-odl_l3-nofeature-ha scenario (passed healthcheck) https://build.opnfv.org/ci/job/functest-daisy-virtual-daily-master/111/console 02:35:46 failure during api_check test case is caused by functest testcase change(https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/37023/), and change has bug. I believe the change owner is working on that. 02:36:44 ok - good news 02:37:22 and odl-l2 we tested without problem , just it haven't online 02:38:14 #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=8690599 02:38:25 ^^ agenda 02:39:32 #topic Milestone 3.2 - installers able to successfully deploy scenario with integrated SDN and pass health check 02:40:12 #info huzhj reports success with Daisy in meeting the requirements of MS3.2 - see previous links posted by huzhj 02:41:27 Justin attended the main release meeting today, so we've already discussed MS3.2 02:42:29 Meeting in progress dmcbride? Sorry I'm late 02:42:36 #topic Milestone 5 - scenario integration 02:42:48 hi Yujun 02:42:57 I can move the time of the meeting if that would help 02:43:16 I'm a little concerned about the turnout the past couple of meetings 02:43:33 Current time is perfect for me. Just didn't notice my IRC client is offline 02:44:02 apologies for being late... 02:44:19 I was on a little sick leave last meeting... 02:44:30 hello Ryota 02:44:44 dmcbride, hi 02:45:04 ok - just to recap 02:45:15 I guess sometimes people are confused by pacific time and daylight saving things, dmcbride 02:45:29 Changing the invitation to UTC time may help 02:45:54 Because the date is different, I saw r-mibu ask about meeting yesterday 02:46:14 ok - I can do that 02:46:28 I'll update the meeting date to UTC 02:46:45 dmcbride, I'm reading log and agenda, no need to recap only for me 02:46:46 I just need to figure out how to make google calendar do that ;) 02:47:21 ok - fair enough 02:47:33 let's continue with MS5, then 02:47:46 Google calendar is awesome, but seems it does not remove outdated meeting schedule automatically ? 02:48:15 #info Milestone 5 is scheduled for July 28 02:48:38 #info this is the point at which feature development should be completed 02:48:55 #info however, it's understood that testing and bug-fixing continues 02:50:11 #info MS6 - test case implementation - falls two weeks after MS5 on Aug 11 02:51:33 #info based on the results of MS3.0, 3.1, 3.2, and 4, we should be able to say right now that installers are stable and functest may be used to implement new test cases 02:51:55 If this is not the case, I need feedback from you 02:52:05 this has been a problem in the past 02:52:27 I believe that the installers are stable, then I find out too late that they're not 02:52:37 right, so I've been waiting the installers become ready 02:52:52 so, if you have any concerns about the state of the installers, I need to know that as soon as possible 02:52:55 does anyone have tried? anyhow, I'll test today 02:53:24 @r-mibu we were talking about MS3.2 at the start of the meeting 02:53:24 dmcbride: Error: "r-mibu" is not a valid command. 02:53:45 r-mibu: we were talking about MS3.2 at the start of the meeting 02:54:04 #link http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-release/2017/opnfv-release.2017-07-12-02.30.log.txt 02:54:09 The recap of current meeting 02:54:25 MS3.2 requires installers to successfully deploy a scenario with an integrated SDN controller and pass health check 02:54:26 ah, ok 02:55:11 I haven't finished, but the compliance evidence I've received from the installer teams suggests that they are meeting this requirement 02:55:27 but if I'm wrong, I need you to tell me 02:56:15 r-mibu: how is your work for Euphrates proceeding? 02:56:48 not so good so far 02:57:04 one member from ZTE is working very hard 02:57:20 but, we still need more contribution from the community 02:57:35 and I'm working on testing from this week 02:58:20 which community are you referring to? Doctor? OPNFV? 02:58:30 Doctor... 02:59:23 well, we have good number of contributors though 02:59:55 anyhow, I'll control the tasks and avoid making exceptions for MS5 03:00:37 perhaps you can defer some of the new features to the next release? 03:00:56 The current tricky thing is fuel can not be used. 03:01:06 yes, we'll do, actually we deferred some tasks in danube as well 03:01:51 shangxdy: what's the issue with Fuel? 03:02:38 There is no fuel iso available 03:03:49 shangxdy: for Euphrates? 03:04:12 yes, for release E 03:04:42 shangxdy: could you send me an email that describes the problem? 03:05:28 #topic Danube 3 release 03:05:29 OK 03:05:33 ok - final topic 03:06:43 #info @rpaik has called for a vote from the TSC on the July 14 release date 03:07:39 #info there was some question about whether we would defer again, but the feedback I've received is to go ahead with the release on Friday 03:07:56 does anyone have any concerns about releasing on Friday? 03:08:37 #info July 12 - complete testing 03:09:05 #info July 13 - complete updates to documentation / JIRA cleanup 03:09:19 #info July 14 - tag repos 03:10:02 I have a small question. If we don't plan to update anything in Danube 3.0, is it OK to skip it silently? I mean for testing project like QTIP 03:10:55 yujunz-zte: the agreement we reached last fall was that any project or scenario released in 1.0 would be released in 2.0 and 3.0 03:11:48 basically, this means that you need to continue to support the project or the scenario through 3.0, even if you aren't doing any new development 03:12:33 for example, if a scenario starts failing to deploy leading up to 3.0, the scenario owner needs to diagnose it and make corrections 03:13:14 yujunz-zte: in your case, I would say that if QTIP was not functioning correctly for some reason, then you would need to fix it 03:13:47 I see. I'll check the status and try to catch up with the schedule 03:13:49 yujunz-zte: otherwise, all you need to do is to configure your documentation for Danube 3.0 03:13:56 Since we don't rely on scenario that much 03:15:01 yujunz-zte: understood - just make sure that your documentation is setup for D3 03:15:30 OK, thanks for the clarification 03:16:00 #info Sofia is having a documentation meeting at 6 a.m. Pacific 03:16:28 I guess that would be 9 p.m. CST 03:17:14 ok - thanks for attending 03:17:33 e-mail me, or catch me on IRC if you have questions or concerns 03:17:40 #endmeeting