#opnfv-sfc: OPNFV-SFC Weekly - 2017-05-24

Meeting started by jvidal at 14:02:25 UTC (full logs).

Meeting summary

    1. Juan Vidal (jvidal, 14:02:39)
    2. Jose Lausuch (jose_lausuch, 14:02:53)
    3. https://hangouts.google.com/group/XCfW0QHpUMeEsKC63 (jvidal, 14:03:51)
    4. Manuel Buil (mbuil, 14:05:12)
    5. Vijayendra Radhakrishna (Vijayendra, 14:06:44)
    6. https://hangouts.google.com/group/XCfW0QHpUMeEsKC63 (jose_lausuch, 14:07:54)

  2. Problems on logger (Vijay) (jvidal, 14:14:17)
    1. some refactoring took place for Euphrates in functest logger (jvidal, 14:15:54)
    2. jose_lausuch mentions there can be some unstabilities until "framework ready" milestone (jvidal, 14:16:37)

  3. Starting with Openstack-Ansible (jvidal, 14:17:39)
    1. how much support from the installers are we having right now? We need to rewrite it? (jvidal, 14:18:46)
    2. integration with OSA is taking longer than expected (jvidal, 14:24:54)
    3. Manuel can help deploying Tacker with OSA (jvidal, 14:29:08)
    4. ACTION: jvidal will send a mail to agree the way forward (jvidal, 14:29:30)
    5. https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/INF/XCI+Developer+Sandbox (jvidal, 14:34:06)

  4. AOB (jvidal, 14:35:54)
    1. jose_lausuch mentions that functest is moving away from openstack_utils and using SNAPS-OO (jvidal, 14:37:46)
    2. tacker_utils and specific stuff can be kept for some time, but main projects (nova, neutron...) should use SNAPS (jvidal, 14:38:26)
    3. ODL Carbon is released this week (jvidal, 14:39:04)
    4. mbuil reports that SFC does not work well, but things should be fixed with Carbon SR1 (jvidal, 14:39:52)
    5. https://jira.opnfv.org/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?rapidView=5&projectKey=SFC&view=planning&selectedIssue=SFC-93 (jvidal, 14:43:18)
    6. https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/Service+Function+Chaining+-+SFC (jose_lausuch, 14:48:44)


Meeting ended at 14:51:33 UTC (full logs).

Action items

  1. jvidal will send a mail to agree the way forward


Action items, by person

  1. jvidal
    1. jvidal will send a mail to agree the way forward


People present (lines said)

  1. jvidal (25)
  2. jose_lausuch (6)
  3. mohankumar (5)
  4. mlavalle (4)
  5. collabot` (3)
  6. Vijayendra (3)
  7. mbuil (3)


Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.