08:30:38 #startmeeting Yardstick work meeting 08:30:38 Meeting started Mon May 30 08:30:38 2016 UTC. The chair is kubi001. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 08:30:38 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 08:30:38 The meeting name has been set to 'yardstick_work_meeting' 08:31:00 #info qiujuan 08:31:04 #info Jing 08:31:06 #info Mingjiang 08:31:07 #info kubi 08:31:07 #info Kanglin 08:31:16 #info wuzhihui 08:31:55 akosfarago: ping 08:32:01 hello 08:32:10 welcome 08:32:18 hi,Alos 08:32:24 sorry,Akos 08:32:43 #topic dpdk testing 08:33:33 Zhihui_Wu: akosfarago : could you share ideas about dpdk testing with us 08:34:07 please let us know if there is still something need someone to help 08:34:09 what exactly would you like to know? 08:34:11 I am working on building the yardstick image following akos'way. 08:35:44 i just want to make sure if you will create a new dedicated image for dpdk testing 08:36:15 i think it's a good idea to make a seperate image for dpdk 08:36:43 since most of the test cases are running without dpdk 08:37:29 but keep in mind we are running dpdk inside the VM not on OVS 08:37:46 akosfarago: yes, i see 08:38:22 akosfarago: we need to do something in CI if we make a eperate image for dpdk, yes? 08:39:46 if we need to run those test cases in CI then yes, we should do something 08:41:11 akosfarago: one more thing which i want to check is dpdk will work with wily. 08:41:38 it works with wily, we have managed to do it before 08:41:53 akosfarago: that's great 08:42:01 if work on wily, we need to build a new image for dpdk. 08:42:19 but why would you need wily on the long-term if we have xenial? 08:42:21 or change the original image to wily? 08:42:43 Akos, have you checked the latest version of pktgen-dpdk? 08:43:04 not yet 08:43:25 i'd like upgrade the orginal image version 08:44:11 kubi001: to which distribution? 08:45:32 i'd like to upgrade to xenial if dpdk could work with it. 08:46:22 akosfarago: what's your opinion 08:46:41 so you want to run the non-DPDK testcases also on xenial so we wont have two different distributions? 08:46:46 i think its okay 08:47:37 akosfarago: it will be better if we can keep the aligned with different image 08:49:08 any comments from others? 08:50:29 #topic code review 08:51:26 #link https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/14823/ 08:51:45 here is the draft for plugin function. 08:52:14 it will be used as the sample of vsperf integration 08:52:37 if you have any ideas, please give comments 08:53:50 #topic yardstick framework evolution 08:54:27 I am working on checking in the first patch of change 08:54:40 #link https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/14825/ 08:54:50 yes:) 08:55:40 qiujuan: great, please keep it success with ci test 08:55:54 currently there seems to some issues with my check-in, I will fix it ASAP 08:56:07 yeah,got it 08:56:11 qiujuan: thank you 08:56:59 #info trevor will give us a proposal about yardstick framework evolution in next weekly meeting 08:57:21 cool 08:57:43 next week? 08:58:18 time is UTC15:00 on next Monday, i will sent GTM meeting invation later. 08:58:42 but also need to double check with trevor. 08:58:57 i'm afraid i cant atend since i'll be on vacation next week 08:59:37 Tomb-sweeping Day? 09:00:38 Mingjiang6: sorry, i'm wrong 09:00:40 dragon-boat day in the weekend in china, i'll ask to leave during the week. 09:01:22 kubi001: np 09:01:24 Mingjiang6: that's ok 09:01:41 i will record the presentation 09:02:00 #topic others 09:02:06 anything else? 09:02:33 i've seen fuqiao leave some comments in the etherpad 09:02:55 #link https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/yardstick_ha_tc003 09:03:55 Mingjiang6: thank you for remind, please feel free to give comments 09:04:36 qiujuan: please check the etherpad 09:04:57 anything else? 09:04:57 kubi001: Got it. We'll check it 09:05:05 Kanglin: thank you 09:05:29 thank you for today. 09:05:36 #endmeeting