08:29:13 #startmeeting Yardstick Work Meeting 08:29:13 Meeting started Mon Sep 12 08:29:13 2016 UTC. The chair is kubi. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 08:29:13 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 08:29:13 The meeting name has been set to 'yardstick_work_meeting' 08:30:08 #topic roll call 08:30:18 #info kubi 08:30:24 #info Jing 08:30:32 #info zhihui_wu 08:30:37 #info Kanglin 08:30:53 # wulin wang 08:31:01 #info Mingjiang 08:31:03 #info chenjiankun 08:31:10 #info wangwulin 08:31:13 zhihui_wu: hi, nice to see you again 08:32:04 :) sorry for missing some meeting 08:32:24 zhihui_wu: you are welcome :) 08:32:30 #topic committer update after Colorado 1.0 08:32:46 Rex Lee proposed yardstick: bugfix: yardstick reporing in stable branch omit stable/ https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/20865 08:32:53 A comment has been added to a proposed change to yardstick: bugfix: yardstick reporing in stable branch omit stable/ https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/20865 08:33:50 #info After Colorado 1.0, I will update the commiter list, remove the unactive committers and nominate actvie contributors 08:34:18 thanks for all contributors 08:34:53 #topic Colorado stable status 08:35:35 #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/yardstick/Yardstick+Colorado+CI+Status 08:35:53 here is the wiki page for stable status 08:36:20 today I deploy scenario os-nosdn-ovs-ha on my local pod. It deployed successfully. 08:36:29 But the instance can not accessed via floating ip. 08:38:08 zhihui_wu: in which installer environment? 08:38:17 with fuel 08:38:38 A comment has been added to a proposed change to yardstick: bugfix: yardstick reporing in stable branch omit stable/ https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/20865 08:38:55 from your link, yardstick with this scenario is also failed. 08:39:03 Jing: Is the os-nosdn-ovs-ha work with CI? 08:39:36 kubi: No, this scenario is not running in CI 08:39:37 as i recall, only fuel support "os-nosdn-ovs-ha" 08:40:18 Do you follow the statusof this scenario with fuel? 08:41:07 zhihui_wu: so you want to deploy "os-nosdn-ovs-ha" to run DPDK test case? 08:41:26 there is no run of this scenario with fuel yet. 08:41:36 only this scenario support hugepage. I used to plan execute dpdk test case with this scenario. 08:41:39 kubi, yes 08:42:38 Is there anyone troubleshooting with this problem? 08:42:45 zhihui_wu: This scenario is runing in master branch. 08:43:55 Jing , you mean release c does not support this scenairo? 08:45:02 zhihui_wu: Jing: I guess we need to check with Fuel team, It seems that they didn't run the CI job with stable branch. 08:45:54 please check this https://build.opnfv.org/ci/view/fuel/job/fuel-os-nosdn-ovs-ha-baremetal-daily-colorado/ 08:46:43 I think they run the CI job, just becase the deploy job is failed, so yardstick job is not triggered. 08:47:09 zhihui_wu: oh, yes, you are right 08:47:45 but in my local pod, the deployment is successful, but the health check is failed. 08:48:18 zhihui_wu: I see 08:49:07 zhihui_wu: I 'd like to check with fuel team whether they have plan to fix the error before Colorado 1.0 08:49:20 kubi, ok, thanks 08:49:45 #action kubi will check with fuel team whether they have plan to fix os-nosdn-ovs-ha error before Colorado 1.0 08:49:46 in master branch, the deployment job is successful 08:50:03 zhihui_wu: thanks for figure out this. 08:50:08 zhihui_wu: got it. 08:50:45 #topic New Feature Demo 08:51:10 #info last week, Mingjiang give a demo about test suite evolution 08:51:42 so, I' d like to continue this demo to other new feature 08:52:20 any volunteer to give a demo about new feature 08:53:15 kubi: I would like to host the next demo. 08:53:40 Jing: great, what would you like to show 08:54:19 I can make a intro about the new plugin feature to the team. 08:54:46 Jing: thansk 08:55:06 #info Jing will give a demo about Yardstick Plugin to the team 08:55:40 Jing: looking forwad to watch this demo 08:56:31 As this thurday is mid autumn festival vacation, we will deley the demo to next Thursday Meeting. 08:56:44 Jing: Is it OK for you? 08:57:03 no problem 08:57:08 Jing: thanks 08:57:34 #info Next Demo will be given at Next Thursday Meeting. 08:57:49 #topic others 08:57:50 anything else? 08:57:53 yes 08:58:02 zhihui_wu: go ahead 08:58:06 I noticed that base ubuntu iso file and cirros are put into yardstick docker image. IMO, it is not good to make a big yardstick docker image. 08:58:27 I suggest to boot the yardsitck containner with parameter -v, mount a local image store directory to the container. 08:59:16 the owner of pod can download the iso file on local. 09:00:37 zhihui_wu: good suggestion:) 09:01:16 zhihui_wu: ubuntu iso file was added with the storperf integration 09:02:16 Maybe I miss some important thing. 09:02:31 can you give more details about it ? 09:04:36 zhihui_wu: one questiion is how to make it work with CI, if we use -v, we need every CI pod exist ISO file at first 09:05:22 zhihui_wu: ubuntu iso is used for storperf test case. 09:05:40 if ci pod doesn't exist iso file, we can download it 09:05:50 just like preious 09:06:19 just like before 09:06:37 i suggest this to be posponed, since we want all this to be automatic 09:06:46 in CI 09:08:17 now we've got docker ci job to push docker image everyday 09:08:35 please refer the jjb file of fuel, it is a common practice 09:10:08 it can be postponed, but it is worth to be considered 09:11:02 agree, if this practice can short the ci time, that would be great. 09:11:19 zhihui_wu: I think it is a good idea. 09:11:34 zhihui_wu: could you help to do this? 09:11:47 Yes, I am glad to do this 09:12:03 zhihui_wu: great! thanks 09:12:22 I did the same task with qtip. :) 09:12:54 zhihui_wu: could you create a JIRA about this task after the meeting 09:13:10 kubi, ok 09:13:20 zhihui_wu: thank 09:14:29 #info zhihui will create a jira about remove the iso file from Yardstick docker image and Run with CI. 09:14:42 zhihui_wu: thanks, anything else? 09:15:11 nope yet 09:15:36 OK, thanks for today. 09:15:44 #endmeeting