Thursday, 2022-09-01

*** rajm <rajm!~robert@cpc126990-macc4-2-0-cust43.1-3.cable.virginm.net> has joined #cip05:30
*** rajm <rajm!~robert@cpc126990-macc4-2-0-cust43.1-3.cable.virginm.net> has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)06:45
*** uli <uli!~uli@55d42941.access.ecotel.net> has joined #cip08:12
*** toscalix <toscalix!~toscalix@227.red-81-37-26.dynamicip.rima-tde.net> has joined #cip08:24
*** masami <masami!~masami@FL1-125-198-44-131.tky.mesh.ad.jp> has joined #cip11:50
*** pave1 <pave1!~pavel@jabberwock.ucw.cz> has joined #cip11:58
*** jki <jki!~jki@195.145.170.147> has joined #cip12:01
jkiHi all!12:01
iwamatsuhi!12:01
pave1Hi!12:01
masamihi12:01
ulihello12:01
patersonc[m]Afternoon12:02
jki#startmeeting CIP IRC weekly meeting12:03
collab-meetbotMeeting started Thu Sep  1 12:03:01 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is jki. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.12:03
collab-meetbotUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.12:03
collab-meetbotThe meeting name has been set to 'cip_irc_weekly_meeting'12:03
*** collab-meetbot changes topic to " (Meeting topic: CIP IRC weekly meeting)"12:03
jki#topic AI review12:03
*** collab-meetbot changes topic to "AI review (Meeting topic: CIP IRC weekly meeting)"12:03
jki1. Resolve/ignore failures of KernelCI on 4.4-cip - alicefm12:03
alicefhi12:03
alicefno updates12:03
*** fbezdeka <fbezdeka!~flo@2a02:810d:8780:7fc:b0:fb65:f05a:7717> has joined #cip12:03
jkibut the ball regarding this is correctly in your field ATM?12:04
alicefyes, we was discussing it with fbezdeka12:05
jkiok12:05
jki2. Check cip devices on kernelci old pull request - patersonc12:06
patersonc[m]Still not done12:06
jkiany other AIs from last weeks?12:06
jki312:07
jki212:07
pave1No, IIRC.12:07
jki112:07
jki#topic Kernel maintenance updates12:07
*** collab-meetbot changes topic to "Kernel maintenance updates (Meeting topic: CIP IRC weekly meeting)"12:07
ulifinished reviewing 5.10.13712:07
pave1I'm travelling this week. Some reviews done on 5.10.138 and 5.10.140. 5.10.139 contains single patch.12:07
masamiThis week reported 11 new CVEs and 7 updated CVEs.12:08
iwamatsuI am reviewing 5.10.14012:08
pave1I'm not sure if I'll be able to make it to the meeting tommorow (sorry).12:08
jkiwhich meeting?12:09
pave1I may be mistaken. I thought there's one on Zoom.12:09
pave1CIP TSC meeting.12:10
jkieTSC was yesterday ;)12:10
pave1Aha. Sorry :-).12:10
pave1That makes things simpler.12:10
jkithere are some follow-ups from the meeting, more later12:12
jkimaybe for reference and discussion here: I did some stats on releases since April12:13
jki5.10:        1012:13
jki5.10-rt:    212:13
jki4.19:        912:13
jki4.19-rt:    212:13
jki4.4:        212:13
jki4.4-rt:     212:13
jkiwe were on track with 5.10 and 4.19 and with 4.4-rt IIRC12:14
jki5.10-rt, 4.19-rt and 4.4 are a bit behind the targets12:14
jkiOTOH, no one complained so far12:15
pave1AFAICT last 5.10-rt was in July, so we should do one ASAP.12:16
pave14.19-rt was also in July, so next should be sometime in September.12:16
pave14.4-rt was in August, so next one should be in October.12:17
jki4.19-rt is indeed fine as well - 0.5 per month12:18
jki5.10-rt is one per month12:18
jkiso is 4.412:18
jkihttps://wiki.linuxfoundation.org/civilinfrastructureplatform/start#kernel_maintainership12:19
pave1Agreed. We should do 5.10-cip-rt when next 5.10-rt is released.12:20
jkiwould be good12:20
iwamatsuBut it depends on the RT release....12:21
jkiwell, if they are releasing at lower rates than what we promise, we need to account for that12:22
jkiwhich likely mean lowering our promises and communicating that12:22
pave1Let me check. Trouble with -stable-rt is that 4.9-rt, 4.19-rt and 5.10-rt each have different maintainer with different release rates.12:23
pave15.10 rt has one release a month for12:25
jkithat would still fit12:25
jkiworst case if we miss one: one month without a release, but next one with 2 then12:26
pave12022 (or more).12:26
pave1But did not have one in August, AFAICT.12:26
pave1So we should get "soon" when he releases.12:27
jkigood12:27
jkiany other maintenance topics?12:27
patersonc[m]The other option is to fund the RT project and ask for more frequent releases12:28
jkiwell, we do that already12:28
jkibut not so much for maintenance12:28
patersonc[m]Then maybe we should ask them what is possible12:28
jkiI don't think that is directly paid out of the LF project12:28
jkiwe can still ask for clarification and can try to prioritize this once the mainline merge is "done"12:29
jkiI think the next RT meeting is end of Sept12:29
jkimove on?12:30
jki312:30
jki212:30
jki112:31
jki#topic Kernel testing12:31
*** collab-meetbot changes topic to "Kernel testing (Meeting topic: CIP IRC weekly meeting)"12:31
alicefstill no updates on CIP pr progress12:32
jkianything is?12:34
alicefKernelCI have some updates and still working on CIP pr but no updates12:34
jkiok, anything else?12:38
jki312:39
jki212:39
jki112:39
jki#topic AOB12:39
*** collab-meetbot changes topic to "AOB (Meeting topic: CIP IRC weekly meeting)"12:39
jkiRISC-V and 5.10-cip12:39
jkiin order to ramp up support for RISC-V and then add the RZ-Five, I suggested to first officially declare support for that arch in our latest kernel12:40
jkithat would become a proposal to the TSC to vote on12:40
pave1Ok. I guess we can do that for kernel.12:40
jkiright, only for the kernel so far12:41
iwamatsuI think so12:41
iwamatsuQEMU too?12:41
pave1I was not able to get working userspace so far, and it looks like userspace is a bit of "work in progress" at the moment.12:41
pave1Yeah, I guess we should do QEMU if we claim RISC-V support.12:41
jkiuserspace depends on where you pick it up from, and when12:41
jkiright qemu-riscv64 would become the first target12:42
iwamatsuOkay12:42
jkifor 5.10-cip then12:42
pave1Do we want to claim risc-v-realtime?12:42
jkigood question...12:42
jkiI doubt that this is already seriously looked it, is it?12:42
pave1I have not checked really, but -rt only supports listed architectures.12:43
jkiand is RISC-V listed at all?12:43
jkiif not, that would be easy for us :)12:43
pave1I'd have to check. Lets add it to my todo list.12:44
jkiplease check soon, then I can also send out the proposal sooner12:45
jkiso, what do we do for userspace for now?12:45
jkibuildroot? some frozen and known-to-be-good(TM) debian sid-version?12:45
patersonc[m]Can we just use the Renesas/Yocto userspace for now?12:45
patersonc[m]Does it need to be Debian?12:46
jkidoes it have all features we need to kernel testing?12:46
jkieventually, it has to be Debian, sure, but we can start differently12:46
pave1So... I tried various debian versions and one Ubuntu version.12:46
patersonc[m]May need some additions for LTP etc.12:46
pave1On each version I tried, ldconfig segfaults and gcc segfaults.12:46
jkiagainst QEMU or RZ/Five?12:47
pave1On RZ/Five. Other software worked quite well.. so this is quite suspect.12:47
jkilet's focus on QEMU first, I would say12:47
pave1That makes sense, I guess.12:47
jkimeanwhile, chris & Co. can double-check your findings12:48
patersonc[m]Ah yes, can't use the Renesas BSP for qemu - sorry :P12:48
iwamatsuIf we don't need a big application (GNOME etc), I think there's no problem with Debian/unstable.12:48
jkiDebian unstable is only stable when you freeze it via snapshot.d.o12:48
jkibut, yes, you can use that for even bigger applications12:49
jkiwe have ROS2 running on it12:49
jkiwith hacks...12:49
iwamatsuNo problem, Debian does not support ROS2 all packages yet... :-P12:50
jkianyway, we should take what is easiest to enable for kernel testing, works on QEMU and should be easy to run on RZ/Five as well12:50
patersonc[m]+112:52
iwamatsuBTW, I can't find RT-Linux Project and RISC-V support information. Probably not in the list.12:52
iwamatsu+112:52
jkiok, then I will draft a proposal over adding RISC-V as architecture to 5.10-cip and adding qemu-riscv64 as new reference target12:53
jkimentioning that -rt is not in scope as upstream does not support it yet12:53
patersonc[m]Thank you12:54
jkilikely not even in 6.0-rt12:54
pave1iwamatsu: Yes, I suspect so. AFAICT x86-64 is highest priority for -rt, arm64 being second one.12:54
iwamatsuOK12:54
jkiperfect12:54
jkiany other business?12:55
patersonc[m]Just apologies for not being here for the testing bit. I've nothing to add regardless12:56
jkinp12:58
jkithen let's close...12:58
jki312:58
jki212:58
jki112:58
jki#endmeeting12:58
collab-meetbotMeeting ended Thu Sep  1 12:58:23 2022 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)12:58
collab-meetbotMinutes:        http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/cip/2022/09/cip.2022-09-01-12.03.html12:58
collab-meetbotMinutes (text): http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/cip/2022/09/cip.2022-09-01-12.03.txt12:58
collab-meetbotLog:            http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/cip/2022/09/cip.2022-09-01-12.03.log.html12:58
*** collab-meetbot changes topic to "Civil Infrastructure Platform Project. CIP mailing list at https://lists.cip-project.org/g/cip-dev | CIP kernel meeting every Thursday at 12:00 UTC | Find the meeting logs at https://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/cip/ and chat logs at https://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/logs/%23cip/""12:58
jkithanks all!12:58
alicefmThis week I was busy with OSS europe presentation12:58
ulithanks12:58
iwamatsuThank you12:58
masamithank you12:58
alicefmhttps://osseu2022.sched.com/event/15z4y/merging-your-kernel-testing-code-into-kernelci-alice-ferrazzi-hirotaka-motai-miracle-linux-powered-by-cybertrust-japan-co-ltd if some is interested12:58
pave1Thank you!12:58
alicefmThank you12:58
*** masami <masami!~masami@FL1-125-198-44-131.tky.mesh.ad.jp> has quit IRC (Quit: Leaving)12:58
fbezdekaThanks!12:59
patersonc[m]Thank you alicef12:59
*** pave1 <pave1!~pavel@jabberwock.ucw.cz> has quit IRC (Quit: Leaving)12:59
*** monstr <monstr!~monstr@2a02:768:2307:40d6::f9e> has joined #cip13:01
*** jki <jki!~jki@195.145.170.147> has quit IRC (Quit: Leaving)13:44
*** uli <uli!~uli@55d42941.access.ecotel.net> has left #cip (Leaving)13:47
*** fbezdeka <fbezdeka!~flo@2a02:810d:8780:7fc:b0:fb65:f05a:7717> has left #cip13:53
*** prabhakarlad <prabhakarlad!~prabhakar@pc.renesas.eu> has quit IRC (Quit: Client closed)15:13
*** monstr <monstr!~monstr@2a02:768:2307:40d6::f9e> has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection)17:04
*** rajm <rajm!~robert@cpc126990-macc4-2-0-cust43.1-3.cable.virginm.net> has joined #cip17:29
*** toscalix <toscalix!~toscalix@227.red-81-37-26.dynamicip.rima-tde.net> has quit IRC (Quit: Konversation terminated!)18:39
*** rajm <rajm!~robert@cpc126990-macc4-2-0-cust43.1-3.cable.virginm.net> has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)21:52
*** helmut_ <helmut_!helmut@subdivi.de> has joined #cip21:58
*** helmut <helmut!helmut@subdivi.de> has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)21:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!