Thursday, 2023-03-09

*** alicef <alicef!~none@gentoo/developer/alicef> has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 255 seconds)00:55
*** alicef_ <alicef_!~none@gentoo/developer/alicef> has joined #cip00:55
*** ChanServ sets mode: +o alicef_00:55
*** prabhakarlad <prabhakarlad!~prabhakar@pc.renesas.eu> has quit IRC (Quit: Client closed)02:17
*** rajm <rajm!~robert@cpc126990-macc4-2-0-cust43.1-3.cable.virginm.net> has joined #cip06:49
*** prabhakarlad <prabhakarlad!~prabhakar@pc.renesas.eu> has joined #cip09:24
*** prabhakarlad <prabhakarlad!~prabhakar@pc.renesas.eu> has quit IRC (Quit: Client closed)11:46
*** uli <uli!~uli@2001:4091:a245:8159:9912:56c5:3722:89bb> has joined #cip11:46
*** sietze <sietze!~sietze_va@http-v.fe.bosch.de> has joined #cip12:00
*** prabhakarlad <prabhakarlad!~prabhakar@pc.renesas.eu> has joined #cip12:14
*** masami <masami!~masami@FL1-125-198-44-131.tky.mesh.ad.jp> has joined #cip12:51
*** jki <jki!~jki@87.130.32.178> has joined #cip13:00
jkihi everyone!13:00
masamihi13:01
ulihello13:01
sietzeGood day13:01
patersonc[m]Hello13:01
iwamatsuhi13:01
alicefmHello13:01
jkilet's get it going13:03
jki#startmeeting CIP IRC weekly meeting13:03
collab-meetbot`Meeting started Thu Mar  9 13:03:06 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is jki. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.13:03
collab-meetbot`Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.13:03
collab-meetbot`The meeting name has been set to 'cip_irc_weekly_meeting'13:03
*** collab-meetbot` changes topic to " (Meeting topic: CIP IRC weekly meeting)"13:03
jki#topic AI review13:03
*** collab-meetbot` changes topic to "AI review (Meeting topic: CIP IRC weekly meeting)"13:03
jki1. enable more stable trees for testing (patersonc)13:03
patersonc[m]We're now testing all of the LTS releases13:03
jkiiirc, there were bbb issues left, right?13:03
patersonc[m]Yea13:03
patersonc[m]I've disabled testing with our BBB config for now13:03
jkiok13:04
patersonc[m]It likely needs to be updated, but I'm not sure where the original came from13:04
patersonc[m]And I can't see an equivalent upstream/google13:04
patersonc[m]iwamatsu: You did the original commit - any ideas?13:04
iwamatsuSorry, I dont understand about it.13:06
patersonc[m]https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-kernel/cip-kernel-config/-/commit/e28e124c4b0bdbf9d9552a3ee77ba29b4247f86f13:06
jkihow to reproduce the bbb issue? use that condig with 6.1-LTS and try to boot?13:07
jkiif so, then isar-cip-core should be able to generate such a broken image as well13:07
jkiI have board at home and could give it try tomorrow if that helps13:08
patersonc[m]This is the bbb config trying to boot with v6.1 on BBB: https://lava.ciplatform.org/scheduler/job/86955913:09
patersonc[m]It also didn't work with v5.1513:09
patersonc[m]I'll add more details to the MR when I make it13:09
patersonc[m]So people can review there13:09
iwamatsuI see, i dont remenber...13:09
iwamatsuBut I will check it.13:09
patersonc[m]iwamatsu: No worries, it was a long time agi!13:09
patersonc[m]s/agi/ago/13:10
patersonc[m]Anyway, once the MRs are done for the LTS testing, shall I expand it to all of the active stable trees? (not just LTS)13:10
pave1i believe that makes sense.13:11
patersonc[m]Okay13:12
jkiso, consider this AI done already, or keep it open until that is done as well?13:12
patersonc[m]I think we can close it. The immediate goal was to get 6.1 testing started13:13
jkiperfect13:14
jki2. report 6.1 test plan to LKML (pavel)13:14
pave1I did.13:14
jkioh, great!13:14
jkiany reactions?13:15
pave1I was under impression that we'll test everything, and may have confused that.13:15
pave1Nothing so far.13:15
jkianyway - thanks!13:15
jki3. clarify usage of .sources files in cip-kernel-config (patersonc)13:15
patersonc[m]pave1: I think so - and we'll get there :)13:16
patersonc[m]jki: I haven't emailed the ML yet, so action still pending13:16
jkiok13:16
jki4. reach out to Greg regarding LTS (jan)13:16
jkistill open on my side13:16
jkiwill try to ping Ben first, later today or tomorrow13:17
jkiany other AIs?13:17
jki313:17
jki213:17
jki113:17
jki#topic Kernel maintenance updates13:17
*** collab-meetbot` changes topic to "Kernel maintenance updates (Meeting topic: CIP IRC weekly meeting)"13:17
ulinow reviewing 5.10.17313:18
masamiThis week reported 11 new CVEs and 4 updated CVEs.13:18
pave1I did reviews on autosel and 5.10.173.13:18
alicefmGregkh is here13:18
iwamatsuI am reviewing 5.10.173.13:19
pave1S13:19
alicef_gregkh: <- jki13:19
pave1I will need to finish review of 4.4 patches. Sorry for the delay.13:21
gregkhalicef_: ?  I've been here for a very long time...13:21
alicef_gregkh: :)13:23
*** alicef_ is now known as alicef13:23
ulipave1: i would appreciate that, it's been a while13:23
jkigregkh: don't feel disturbed - we would eventually like to understand the needs to make longer LTS sustainable (again) and would reach out for that, likely via LKML13:24
gregkhjki: there are no "needs" to do so, sorry.  As I wrote in the LF Board meeting slide deck last week, "The 6 year LTS experiment has failed"13:24
gregkhespecially given all of the new laws coming into play in the US and EU, long-term kernels just are not going to work at all.13:25
gregkhsorry.13:25
gregkhI predict 3 year max over time, but for now we'll try 4 years to get over the transition period.13:25
gregkhideally we can get back to 2 years, but that needs help from some SoC vendors, which are doing the work now, so we might get there.13:26
gregkhanyway, good luck!13:26
jkithat interpretation of regulations is new to me at least13:26
jkialso talking to colleagues exposed to strict regulations already today13:27
pave1We'll promised to maintain the kernel for 10 years. If law prevents that, we'd like to know...13:27
jkiyep13:27
gregkhdefine "promised", if it's a contract, that's on you, sorry.13:27
gregkhif not, well, you can always change it :)13:28
pave1Looks like it is on LF...13:28
gregkhon the LF?  Hah, no, your working group only, the LF doesn't promise anything with regards to kernel stuff, you all know that :)13:28
patersonc[m]Indeed13:28
pave1Well, fortunately it is not on -me-...13:29
gregkhthen figure out who it is on and work with them please.  good luck!13:30
jkithe only one under contract in his context are suppliers (like my employer) with their customers13:30
gregkhand as for regulations, there's nothing that says "you can not change this kernel version and it must stay the same" in any regulation that I know of.13:30
patersonc[m]CIP always planned to do 10 years support before LTS was extended to 6 years. So there's nothing new for CIP here - just that we don't get 4 extra years of free maintenance from Greg anymore :)13:31
gregkhjki: great, then that's between your employer and their customers, that's not anything with the LF.13:31
gregkhpatersonc[m]: exactly.13:31
pave1But better explanation would still be welcome, and probably get that explanation to people in charge of CIP project.13:31
gregkhpave1: point them at the LF board meeting slides from last week, it has the details if they are curious.13:32
gregkhpave1: and it says what to do if they have questions.13:32
jkigregkh: yes, we only try to support them as community as this is what we recieve funding for13:32
gregkhI'll probably flesh it all out in a blog post eventually to make it more widely visible.13:32
jkithe more I'd like to understand statements like "not going to work at all"13:33
jkithat would be great!13:33
pave1If someone had url for slides or blog post explanation, that would be welcome.13:33
gregkhjki: see the new US and EU rules for the reasoning about "not going to work".  they have the details and requirements.13:33
patersonc[m]pave1: We should be able to get a copy of the slides from Neal13:34
alicefpatersonc[m]: can you share the slides also with me?13:34
pave1petersonc. ok, that makes sense.13:34
alicefonce you get it from Neal13:35
patersonc[m]alicef: Sure when we get them13:35
alicefthanks13:35
pave1So I understand it is LF lawyers saying 10 years can't be done?13:35
*** alicef is now known as arisut13:36
jkigregkh: I've read first statements from community perspectives, but those were about way more fundamental issues13:36
gregkhpave1: nope, not the LF lawyers.  me :)13:36
gregkhpave1: the lawyers have not weighed in on it yet, as no one has asked them to.13:37
gregkhsorry, irc does not lend itself to in depth discussions like this.13:39
gregkhanyway, good luck all!13:39
pave1Ok. I gues this for CIP TSC level or above, not for me. Hopefully slides will clear my curiosity.13:39
pave1Thanks!13:39
patersonc[m]:)13:39
patersonc[m]Thanks gregkh13:40
jkithanks!13:40
jkiok, let's continue with "business as usual" for now ;)13:40
jkianything else regarding maintenance topics?13:40
jki313:41
jki213:41
jki113:41
jki#topic Kernel release status13:41
*** collab-meetbot` changes topic to "Kernel release status (Meeting topic: CIP IRC weekly meeting)"13:41
jki- 4.413:41
ulistill waiting for reviews13:41
jkipavel: ?13:41
jkior anyone?13:42
pave1Should have them no later than tommorow. sorry for delay.13:42
uliok then.13:42
jkigood13:43
jki- 4.1913:43
iwamatsuLTS 4.19 is 4.19.275, and 4.19 of RT kernel is v4.19.271-rt120. no RT tracking.13:43
jkiso, we are on schedule still?13:45
jkia new RT should come these weeks from us13:47
jki-5.1013:48
iwamatsuright, but we can not release -cip-rt this week13:48
iwamatsuLTS 5.10 is 5.10.172. 5.10 of RT kernel is v5.10.168-rt83. on schedule yet.13:49
jkigood13:49
jkithen let's move on13:49
jki#topic Kernel testing13:49
*** collab-meetbot` changes topic to "Kernel testing (Meeting topic: CIP IRC weekly meeting)"13:49
patersonc[m]Main thing from me was expanding the stable testing13:50
patersonc[m]Perhaps the only thing...13:51
jkiok - anyone anything else on testing?13:52
arisuthttps://github.com/kernelci/kernelci-core/pull/170513:52
jkinice!13:52
arisutthe pr for using cip-kernel-configs on cip kernels with kernelCI as been merged13:52
arisutnow we have 5.10.y-cip 4.4.y-cip and 4.19.y-cip testing cip-kernel-config with some kselftest test also13:53
jkigood13:54
jkimove on?13:54
arisutok13:54
jki313:55
jki213:55
sietzeone thing thing from my side13:55
jkigo ahead!13:55
sietzeI requested a chat with Chris considering test reporting13:55
sietzepatersonc will you be able to make that?13:55
sietzeIs there anybody else interested in that topic here?13:56
patersonc[m]sietze: Yes, sorry for not getting back13:56
jkiwill you do that exchange directly, or in a recorded irc?13:57
jkiwould possibly point some colleague afterward to it13:57
sietzeI arranged a teams meeting, (bosch hosted I guess). But can invite anybody who's interested13:58
sietzeAnyway, most important thing is that Chris will be there13:59
sietzeIf not, than IMHO the meeting will not make much sense13:59
jkithen just summarize next time ;)13:59
jkitia!13:59
jkianything else?14:00
patersonc[m]sietze: Perhaps forward the invite to the cip-members mainling list14:00
sietzeOk, good. THanks for accepting. Will forward to cip-members then14:00
sietzeNeed to step out now14:01
sietzeThanks!14:01
*** sietze <sietze!~sietze_va@http-v.fe.bosch.de> has quit IRC (Quit: Leaving)14:01
jki#topic AOB14:01
*** collab-meetbot` changes topic to "AOB (Meeting topic: CIP IRC weekly meeting)"14:01
patersonc[m]sietze: Thanks14:01
jkianything on other business today?14:01
jki514:02
jki414:02
jki314:02
jki214:02
jki114:02
jki#endmeeting14:02
collab-meetbot`Meeting ended Thu Mar  9 14:02:59 2023 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)14:02
collab-meetbot`Minutes:        http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/cip/2023/03/cip.2023-03-09-13.03.html14:02
collab-meetbot`Minutes (text): http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/cip/2023/03/cip.2023-03-09-13.03.txt14:02
collab-meetbot`Log:            http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/cip/2023/03/cip.2023-03-09-13.03.log.html14:02
*** collab-meetbot` changes topic to "Civil Infrastructure Platform Project. CIP mailing list at https://lists.cip-project.org/g/cip-dev | CIP kernel meeting every Thursday at 13:00 UTC | Find the meeting logs at https://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/cip/ and chat logs at https://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/logs/%23cip/"14:03
jkithank you all?14:03
jki! :)14:03
arisutthanks14:03
pave1thank you!14:03
masamithank you14:03
ulithanks14:03
patersonc[m]:D14:03
*** jki <jki!~jki@87.130.32.178> has quit IRC (Quit: Leaving)14:03
patersonc[m]TTFN14:03
iwamatsuthank you14:03
*** masami <masami!~masami@FL1-125-198-44-131.tky.mesh.ad.jp> has quit IRC (Quit: Leaving)14:04
*** masami <masami!~masami@FL1-125-198-44-131.tky.mesh.ad.jp> has joined #cip14:05
*** uli <uli!~uli@2001:4091:a245:8159:9912:56c5:3722:89bb> has left #cip (Leaving)14:08
*** sietze <sietze!~sietze_va@http-v.fe.bosch.de> has joined #cip15:06
*** sietze <sietze!~sietze_va@http-v.fe.bosch.de> has quit IRC (Quit: Leaving)15:12
*** masami <masami!~masami@FL1-125-198-44-131.tky.mesh.ad.jp> has quit IRC (Quit: Leaving)15:12
*** prabhakarlad <prabhakarlad!~prabhakar@pc.renesas.eu> has quit IRC (Quit: Client closed)17:14
*** pave1 <pave1!~pavel@jabberwock.ucw.cz> has quit IRC (Quit: Leaving)21:36
*** rajm <rajm!~robert@cpc126990-macc4-2-0-cust43.1-3.cable.virginm.net> has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 268 seconds)22:51

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!