Thursday, 2023-04-20

*** rajm <rajm!~robert@cpc126990-macc4-2-0-cust43.1-3.cable.virginm.net> has joined #cip05:50
*** zar_ <zar_!~quassel@mail.nazaryev.ru> has quit IRC (Quit: No Ping reply in 180 seconds.)06:41
*** zar <zar!~quassel@mail.nazaryev.ru> has joined #cip06:42
*** zar <zar!~quassel@mail.nazaryev.ru> has quit IRC (Quit: No Ping reply in 180 seconds.)06:56
*** zar <zar!~quassel@mail.nazaryev.ru> has joined #cip06:57
*** monstr <monstr!~monstr@nat-35.starnet.cz> has joined #cip07:24
*** uli <uli!~uli@2001:4091:a246:805f:9f61:b40d:cca3:5eb> has joined #cip10:35
*** hiromotai <hiromotai!~hiromotai@240f:75:5bc9:1:898b:9e55:6e99:dff0> has joined #cip11:19
*** jki <jki!~jki@ipservice-092-210-001-046.092.210.pools.vodafone-ip.de> has joined #cip11:48
*** masami <masami!~masami@FL1-125-198-44-131.tky.mesh.ad.jp> has joined #cip11:52
jkihi everyone12:00
ulihello12:00
masamihi12:00
hiromotaihi12:00
patersonc[m]hi12:01
alicefmHi12:01
iwamatsuhi12:01
jki#startmeeting CIP IRC weekly meeting12:02
collab-meetbot`Meeting started Thu Apr 20 12:02:32 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is jki. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.12:02
collab-meetbot`Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.12:02
collab-meetbot`The meeting name has been set to 'cip_irc_weekly_meeting'12:02
*** collab-meetbot` changes topic to " (Meeting topic: CIP IRC weekly meeting)"12:02
jki#topic AI review12:02
*** collab-meetbot` changes topic to "AI review (Meeting topic: CIP IRC weekly meeting)"12:02
jki1. create kernelci pipeline for buster images (arisut)12:02
jkiarisut: ?12:03
arisutjust talked with kernelci about the project of using debian style for testing CIP kernel on KernelCI12:03
arisutjust recently12:04
jkiok, so "ongoing"12:04
arisutyes12:04
jkigood12:04
jkiother AIs?12:04
arisutnot from me12:05
jkithen let's move on in12:05
jki112:05
jki312:05
jki212:05
jki112:05
jki#topic Kernel maintenance updates12:05
*** collab-meetbot` changes topic to "Kernel maintenance updates (Meeting topic: CIP IRC weekly meeting)"12:05
masamiThis week reported 8 new CVEs and 2 updated CVEs.12:06
ulireviewing 5.10.17812:06
iwamatsuI reviewed 5.10.178.12:06
jkianything else?12:08
jki312:09
jki212:09
jki112:09
jki#topic Kernel release status12:09
*** collab-meetbot` changes topic to "Kernel release status (Meeting topic: CIP IRC weekly meeting)"12:09
jki-4.412:09
ulion track12:09
jki-4.1912:09
iwamatsuRT has not followed LTS...12:09
jkibut we would have to release now?12:10
jkistrictly spoken, no12:11
jki0.5 per month, last 4.19-rt was end of March12:11
jkiok, then12:12
jki-5.1012:12
iwamatsusame 4.19.12:12
iwamatsus/same/same as /12:12
iwamatsuIf RT is not released this week or next week, it will be difficult to release cip-rt.12:12
jkihere we should do once per month, thus here we are affected then12:12
jkiunderstood12:13
jkiis the same one doing 4.19-RT and 5.10-RT upstream?12:13
*** fbezdeka <fbezdeka!~flo@2a02:810d:8780:7fc:b0:fb65:f05a:7717> has joined #cip12:14
jkijust checked - no12:14
jki4.19 is Daniel, 5.10 is Luis12:14
iwamatsuyes, right12:15
*** pave1 <pave1!~pavel@jabberwock.ucw.cz> has joined #cip12:16
jkisorry, SIGREALLIFE12:17
iwamatsuand Daniel has been release 4.19.280-rt123-rc1. he is updating.12:17
iwamatsuhi, pavel12:17
pave1Hi!12:17
pave1Sorry for the delay. I was reviewing 5.10.178.12:18
jkiback12:18
jkiok, then we are done on this12:19
jki#topic Kernel testing12:19
*** collab-meetbot` changes topic to "Kernel testing (Meeting topic: CIP IRC weekly meeting)"12:19
patersonc[m]I've nothing special to report this week. Just the usual maintenance & stable-rc result reporting12:21
arisutthe isar-cip-core work for kernelci is ongoin12:21
jkiwhat's the state now for 6.1-cip?12:22
arisutwithout branch there is no testing12:23
jkipavel: IIRC, you wanted to follow-up with next steps needed, right?12:23
pave1Yes.12:23
arisutif we have a branch we can start testing it12:24
pave1I guess we should announce that we now expect patches for 6.112:24
pave1for any issue fixed in 5.10.12:24
pave1Then we agree on starting point, branch off, and check for any patches in12:25
patersonc[m]Should we also ask the members if they have any particular configs they want built/tested/supported for 6.1?12:25
jkisure, configs will also be needed12:25
pave15.10 but not in 6.1.12:25
jkiat least forward ports of the qemu configs, to have a starter12:25
pave1Yes, and configs.12:26
pave1We can start from those used for testing  6.1-stable.12:26
jkiwhen did we branch off 5.10-cip back then?12:27
jkiafter the first backport arrived or earlier?12:27
patersonc[m]We already have configs copied from 5.10 (which are used for stable testing). But maybe members what to review/refresh/add to those configs12:27
jkipavel: can you do the call-out on the list for the configs?12:28
patersonc[m]https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-kernel/cip-kernel-config/-/merge_requests/74/diffs?commit_id=570fa322ab77a7c6b5779a6a89bccbdb7757337412:28
arisutconfigs will be added to cip-kernel-config repo?12:28
jkiyep12:28
arisutok12:28
jkiwe already have a 6.1-cip branch there12:29
jkiin fact, we have many branches there, not only for cip kernel it seems12:29
jki"6.2.y-cip"?12:29
patersonc[m]Could be better named 6.2.y tbh12:30
jkiwould be less confusing, yes12:31
jkinot sure if anything elsewhere (kernelci?) is relying on the current path names, though12:31
patersonc[m]It was agreed in the MR to keep it like that12:31
patersonc[m]We don't have any -rt configs for 6.1 yet btw, so we'd also need to get those added12:32
patersonc[m]Assuming we're doing a linux-6.1.y-cip-rt12:33
iwamatsuYes, I've heard that 6.2 is removed from cip-kernel-config when it is removed from stable.12:33
jkiI see no reason for not doing 6.1-rt12:33
jkiok - so, who is doing what next?12:35
patersonc[m]I'll add the pipeline for 6.1 cip testing12:35
pave1I have sending that mail on my todo.12:35
pave1Plus I have a script for for checking if we have all the patches from old kernel.12:36
alicefmI will follow/do the work on kernelci for 6.1 testing12:36
jkisounds like a good plan, thanks12:37
jkianything else on testing?12:37
arisutsame12:37
patersonc[m]Not from me12:38
jkithen let's move on...12:38
jki312:38
jki212:38
jki112:38
jki#topic AOB12:38
*** collab-meetbot` changes topic to "AOB (Meeting topic: CIP IRC weekly meeting)"12:38
jkianyone anything?12:39
jkibtw, no reply from Greg so far after my last, longer answer12:40
patersonc[m]MR for the 6.1-cip CI pipeline is up: https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-cip-pipelines/-/merge_requests/3812:40
pave1jki -- at some point it will make sense to make our bosses to talk to his boss...12:40
jkidoes he have a boss? :)12:41
patersonc[m]ha12:41
pave1Well, no, but someone pays him ...12:41
jkibosses need input on what we need and how much effort we estimate for that12:41
jkiand I think we are still at that level12:41
patersonc[m]It's going to take more than CIP to change the LTS length policy. It'll need lots of companies to commit to supporting the efforts.12:42
jkisure12:42
jkithat's why I was proposing to something like an LTS project - if that makes sense - under LF, with real, paying members12:42
patersonc[m]jki: Cunning12:43
jkior CIP would need a different budget and partially a different mission12:43
pave1Taking over -lts from greg?12:43
jkiCIP can do that as LTS is way broader in scope and we are still too small12:43
jkialso, CIP would need members from - say - consumer domains if consumer .configs should come into scope12:44
jkior server .configs12:44
jkibut Debian LTS was also asking a bit into that direction as they have members from domains not present in CIP12:45
Dr_Whowe've been exploring doing LTSes that pickup where Greg leaves off. (We == Linaro)12:46
Dr_WhoWe already do quite a bit of kernel regression testing that like other projects report into Greg right now12:47
pave1jki -- 'can not'?12:47
jkiDr_Who: not sure who you are ;), but Grant was indicating this as well to me12:47
jkipavel: I was thinking "cannot" and then wrinting "yes, we can" ;)12:48
jkibut I meant "cannot"12:48
Dr_Whoso Linaro is an open source engineering company that a number of companies came together and founded back in 201012:48
pave1Thanks, makes sense.12:48
Dr_WhoArm, Google, Samsung, ST just to name a few12:48
jkiall well known12:49
jkiand Linaro did LTS work before, that's where KernelCI and LAVA had its roots to my understanding12:49
Dr_Whoyup12:49
pave1Well, if Linaro is willing to take over lts mainainance. that would certainly help us...12:50
jkiand if that needs extra funding, we should make that formal, but it should be scoped on LTS12:50
jkiI can imagine that this can attract more - CIP would surely consider supporting such an effort12:51
jkiin any case, someone needs to take a lead here IMHO12:51
Dr_WhoWe're at the exploring phase, there seem to be a number of companies in the same situation, wanting an LTS - as you rightly point out, there is a cost associated with it, engineers like to get paid12:51
pave1Perhaps Linaro should be included in that mailthread with Greg?12:53
Dr_Whocertainly up for a chat12:53
Dr_Whointerestingly I have talked to Greg about this a few weeks back12:53
jkiDr_Who: who should be on the table for such a chat?12:53
Dr_Whothat'd be me tom.gall@linaro.org is my address12:54
jkiDr_Who: great, will follow-up with you12:55
Dr_Whothank you!12:55
jkigood12:56
jkianything else for today?12:56
jki312:57
jki212:57
jki112:57
jki#endmeeting12:57
collab-meetbot`Meeting ended Thu Apr 20 12:57:12 2023 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)12:57
collab-meetbot`Minutes:        http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/cip/2023/04/cip.2023-04-20-12.02.html12:57
collab-meetbot`Minutes (text): http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/cip/2023/04/cip.2023-04-20-12.02.txt12:57
collab-meetbot`Log:            http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/cip/2023/04/cip.2023-04-20-12.02.log.html12:57
*** collab-meetbot` changes topic to "Civil Infrastructure Platform Project. CIP mailing list at https://lists.cip-project.org/g/cip-dev | CIP kernel meeting every Thursday at 12:00 UTC | Find the meeting logs at https://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/cip/ and chat logs at https://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/logs/%23cip/"12:57
jkithank you! have a nice day!12:57
pave1Thank you!12:57
ulithanks12:57
arisutthanks12:57
iwamatsuthank you!12:57
masamithank you12:57
patersonc[m]ttfn12:57
hiromotaithanks12:58
*** hiromotai <hiromotai!~hiromotai@240f:75:5bc9:1:898b:9e55:6e99:dff0> has quit IRC (Quit: Leaving)12:59
*** jki <jki!~jki@ipservice-092-210-001-046.092.210.pools.vodafone-ip.de> has quit IRC (Quit: Leaving)12:59
*** uli <uli!~uli@2001:4091:a246:805f:9f61:b40d:cca3:5eb> has left #cip (Leaving)13:04
*** monstr <monstr!~monstr@nat-35.starnet.cz> has quit IRC (Read error: Connection reset by peer)13:44
*** masami <masami!~masami@FL1-125-198-44-131.tky.mesh.ad.jp> has quit IRC (Quit: Leaving)13:44
*** monstr <monstr!~monstr@nat-35.starnet.cz> has joined #cip13:44
*** monstr <monstr!~monstr@nat-35.starnet.cz> has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection)14:30
*** fbezdeka <fbezdeka!~flo@2a02:810d:8780:7fc:b0:fb65:f05a:7717> has left #cip15:24
*** Dr_Who <Dr_Who!~tgall@70.35.96.200> has quit IRC (Quit: ZZZzzz…)17:28
*** prabhakarlad <prabhakarlad!~prabhakar@pc.renesas.eu> has quit IRC (Quit: Client closed)18:36
*** Dr_Who <Dr_Who!~tgall@2600:1014:b060:e711:6d0e:d23f:eda3:ed3e> has joined #cip19:55
*** Dr_Who <Dr_Who!~tgall@2600:1014:b060:e711:6d0e:d23f:eda3:ed3e> has quit IRC (Quit: ZZZzzz…)21:24
*** rajm <rajm!~robert@cpc126990-macc4-2-0-cust43.1-3.cable.virginm.net> has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)21:44

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!