14:03:27 #startmeeting Architecture Committee 14:03:27 Meeting started Wed May 20 14:03:27 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is farheen_att. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:03:27 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:03:27 The meeting name has been set to 'architecture_committee' 14:06:39 #topic Release status 14:06:57 #info Murali: Licensing issue. 14:07:19 #info Michelle: There is an RTU agreement with the model. I will continue to work with him offline. 14:07:59 #info Michelle: it is just for logging. On a runner side car it tracks the api and provides a file for the logging platform. It is to do some logging and tracking. 14:09:06 #info Manoop: I saw license text that was maintained by Eric. In my opinion this is a false warning. The reason why LF picked up is due to special characters. I think the file got regenerated. I will see if that is the case and verify and email you. 14:09:18 #info Murali: There are 3 issues on the wiki. 14:09:29 #info Manoop: We will discuss after the call. 14:09:42 #topic Licensing demo 14:10:26 #info Michelle and Vaibhav sharing demo screen. Murali recording the demo. 14:48:37 #topic Murali we are waiting for onboarding sanity tests. 14:48:54 #info Phillippe wants to add to this weeks build 14:49:09 #info Phillippe can provide the build in a few hours. 14:49:26 #info Nat: Is licensing sending us a build? 14:49:55 #info Murali: The licensing issue is not critical 14:50:37 #info Nat if onboarding can send it in the next few hours then the release manager will accept it. 14:50:50 #info if this onboarding causes issues then we will defer it. 14:51:59 #info Nat: as soon as we get sanity tests from the test team move your build to the staging repo. Send your notes to Vasu and Murali. 14:52:45 #info Ken the other thing that is blocking us is onboarding the C++ model. 14:52:59 #info Phillippe Ken C++ is a library. It is not code 14:53:59 #info Manoop: Nat Murali how should we schedule the meetings for the architecture and PTL calls. Do we need architecture and PTL calls every week or alternate weeks? 14:54:35 #info should we use the Tuesday morning call every week or alternate one week architecture call and PTL. 14:55:05 #info every Monday we have TSC. Tuesday we have the PTL and Community call. Wed we do he Architecture. 14:56:15 #info TSC will be every alternate Monday. Every Tuesday we can do one week PTL. One week have the Community call alternate with the PTL call alternate with Architecture meeting. 14:57:24 #info the order should be the community call first then the community call then the architecture every Tuesday. Any issues can be brought to the alternate TSC call. 14:58:12 #info Manoop for the weekly agendas PTLs have to reach out to the community with an agenda. Open calls without agendas are not productive. PTLs should provide the agenda items. 14:59:59 #Manoop: We will bring this to the TSC. Next TSC meeting is June 1. 15:00:51 #info Nat: May 26 and June meetings will discuss the point release. 15:00:55 #endmeeting