01:54:01 * ** weshuang has joined #cip 07:30:57 * ** rajm has joined #cip 08:05:46 * rajm ran a successful BBB health check with email to the list 08:14:36 * ** toscalix has joined #cip 08:20:04 * ** toscalix has quit IRC 08:21:34 * ** toscalix has joined #cip 08:49:32 * ** Tzongyen_Lin has joined #cip 09:00:00 <gavinlai> szlin take a few weeks off 09:00:05 <gavinlai> I will chair today 09:01:11 <gavinlai> #startmeeting 09:01:18 <gavinlai> #topic roll call 09:01:36 <gavinlai> please say hi if you're in this meeting 09:01:39 <bwh> hi 09:01:46 <Tzongyen_Lin> hi 09:01:59 <rajm> hi 09:02:25 <gavinlai> #topic kernel patch review update 09:03:01 <gavinlai> Moxa team is reviewing patch 4.4.130 and 4.4.130-cip23 09:03:30 <gavinlai> any question about kernel patch review? 09:04:51 <gavinlai> ok, let's move to next topic 09:04:54 <gavinlai> #topic supportable list and not supportable list 09:05:14 <gavinlai> we plan to have a supportable list and a not supportable list 09:05:25 <gavinlai> bwh provided a list as an example in YAML format: https://paste.baserock.org/noqafihoqa 09:05:38 <gavinlai> about two weeks ago, 09:05:45 <gavinlai> we discussed a case, if we have a supportable *and* a not supportable list, then what does it mean if a symbol is in both lists, or in neither list? 09:06:19 <gavinlai> IMHO, if a symbols is in both lists, that may be a bug. 09:06:39 <gavinlai> if a symbol is in neither list, members can discuss whether to officially support that symbol 09:07:04 <bwh> Seems reasonable 09:07:47 <gavinlai> In current format: https://paste.baserock.org/noqafihoqa 09:08:08 <gavinlai> we provide (1) reason (2) symbol 09:08:30 <gavinlai> do we need any other information? 09:09:32 <gavinlai> I think it is good 09:09:37 <gavinlai> any ideas? 09:10:35 <bwh> Well there's also a directory specified in one case (staging), which I intend to mean that the checker would warn for each enabled symbol in a Kconfig file under that directory 09:12:05 <gavinlai> So, it will be symbol or directory? 09:12:48 <bwh> I was thinking the checker would support matching by symbol name and by directory 09:14:04 <gavinlai> ok 09:14:39 <gavinlai> and how to warn users? 09:16:37 <bwh> Print a warning line for each symbol that's explicitly unsupported. If we add an explicit support list too, print a less severe warning for any symbol that doesn't match either list. 09:17:13 <bwh> "Internal error" if any symbol that matches both list. 09:17:22 <bwh> "Internal error" if any symbol matches both lists. 09:18:11 <bwh> Does that make sense to you? 09:18:24 <gavinlai> Nice 09:19:47 <gavinlai> I think I can try to write a script now 09:20:21 <gavinlai> move to next topic ? 09:21:00 <bwh> OK 09:21:02 <gavinlai> #topic Miscellaneous 09:22:26 <gavinlai> any other business? 09:22:58 <gavinlai> #endmeeting