01:54:01 * ** weshuang has joined #cip
07:30:57 * ** rajm has joined #cip
08:05:46 * rajm ran a successful BBB health check with email to the list
08:14:36 * ** toscalix has joined #cip
08:20:04 * ** toscalix has quit IRC
08:21:34 * ** toscalix has joined #cip
08:49:32 * ** Tzongyen_Lin has joined #cip
09:00:00 <gavinlai> szlin take a few weeks off
09:00:05 <gavinlai> I will chair today
09:01:11 <gavinlai> #startmeeting
09:01:18 <gavinlai> #topic roll call
09:01:36 <gavinlai> please say hi if you're in this meeting
09:01:39 <bwh> hi
09:01:46 <Tzongyen_Lin> hi
09:01:59 <rajm> hi
09:02:25 <gavinlai> #topic kernel patch review update
09:03:01 <gavinlai> Moxa team is reviewing patch 4.4.130 and 4.4.130-cip23
09:03:30 <gavinlai> any question about kernel patch review?
09:04:51 <gavinlai> ok, let's move to next topic
09:04:54 <gavinlai> #topic supportable list and not supportable list
09:05:14 <gavinlai> we plan to have a supportable list and a not supportable list
09:05:25 <gavinlai> bwh provided a list as an example in YAML format: https://paste.baserock.org/noqafihoqa
09:05:38 <gavinlai> about two weeks ago,
09:05:45 <gavinlai> we discussed a case, if we have a supportable *and* a not supportable list, then what does it mean if a symbol is in both lists, or in neither list?
09:06:19 <gavinlai> IMHO, if a symbols is in both lists, that may be a bug.
09:06:39 <gavinlai> if a symbol is in neither list, members can discuss whether to officially support that symbol
09:07:04 <bwh> Seems reasonable
09:07:47 <gavinlai> In current format: https://paste.baserock.org/noqafihoqa
09:08:08 <gavinlai> we provide (1) reason (2) symbol
09:08:30 <gavinlai> do we need any other information?
09:09:32 <gavinlai> I think it is good
09:09:37 <gavinlai> any ideas?
09:10:35 <bwh> Well there's also a directory specified in one case (staging), which I intend to mean that the checker would warn for each enabled symbol in a Kconfig file under that directory
09:12:05 <gavinlai> So, it will be symbol or directory?
09:12:48 <bwh> I was thinking the checker would support matching by symbol name and by directory
09:14:04 <gavinlai> ok
09:14:39 <gavinlai> and how to warn users?
09:16:37 <bwh> Print a warning line for each symbol that's explicitly unsupported. If we add an explicit support list too, print a less severe warning for any symbol that doesn't match either list.
09:17:13 <bwh> "Internal error" if any symbol that matches both list.
09:17:22 <bwh> "Internal error" if any symbol matches both lists.
09:18:11 <bwh> Does that make sense to you?
09:18:24 <gavinlai> Nice
09:19:47 <gavinlai> I think I can try to write a script now
09:20:21 <gavinlai> move to next topic ?
09:21:00 <bwh> OK
09:21:02 <gavinlai> #topic Miscellaneous
09:22:26 <gavinlai> any other business?
09:22:58 <gavinlai> #endmeeting