09:00:00 <masashi910> #startmeeting CIP IRC weekly meeting 09:00:00 <brlogger> Meeting started Thu Nov 12 09:00:00 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is masashi910. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 09:00:00 <brlogger> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 09:00:00 <brlogger> The meeting name has been set to 'cip_irc_weekly_meeting' 09:00:03 <masashi910> #topic rollcall 09:00:11 <masashi910> please say hi if you're around 09:00:18 <pave1> hi 09:00:21 <iwamatsu> hi 09:00:23 <wens> hi 09:00:24 <patersonc> hi 09:00:27 <ebardie> hi 09:00:34 <yoshidak[m]> hi 09:00:37 <masashi910> Let's get started. 09:00:44 <masashi910> #topic AI review 09:00:50 <masashi910> 1. Combine root filesystem with kselftest binary - iwamatsu 09:01:21 <iwamatsu> I dont have a upodate about it. 09:01:30 <masashi910> iwamatsu: Noted. Thanks. 09:01:33 <masashi910> 2. Check whether CVE-2019-0145, CVE-2019-0147, CVE-2019-0148 needs to be backported to 4.4 - Kernel Team 09:01:41 <masashi910> Based on the discussion last week, I sent out an email to cip-dev saying that we are ignoring these patches. 09:01:48 <masashi910> Ben-san responded as follows. 09:01:56 <masashi910> https://lore.kernel.org/cip-dev/9c52fda6f710d3aad6fd9f781b33c4034dee4d10.camel@codethink.co.uk/T/#t 09:02:03 <masashi910> Iwamatsu-san prepared some patches to be reviewed by contributors from Intel. 09:02:08 <masashi910> iwamatsu: Thanks for your work. Could you proceed to ask them for patch reviews? 09:02:45 <iwamatsu> I dont have a upodate about it. 09:02:52 <iwamatsu> OK 09:03:03 <iwamatsu> oh sorry. 09:05:17 <masashi910> iwamatsu: Let me confirm. Is it OK for you to proceed your patches? As a first step is it to ask Intel contributors for their review? 09:06:02 <iwamatsu> masashi910: I will send patches with RFC. 09:06:36 <masashi910> iwamatsu: Thanks very much! Then, I will keep this AI open for a while. Thanks! 09:06:49 <masashi910> Any other topics? 09:07:03 <masashi910> 3 09:07:07 <masashi910> 2 09:07:10 <masashi910> 1 09:07:14 <masashi910> #topic Kernel maintenance updates 09:07:36 <pave1> I have reviewed patches queued for 4.19.156. 09:08:01 <iwamatsu> I reviewed 4.4.243 and 244-rc 09:08:08 <wens> I already sent out report to ML, but to summarize: 4 new issues this week, nothing needs to be done as far as CIP is concerned 09:08:44 <masashi910> pave1, iwamatsu, wens: Thanks for your works! 09:08:49 <wens> iwamatsu: we could consider removing SUNKBD from 4.4.y-cip-rt/x86/siemens_i386-rt.config. I doubt anyone is really using this. 09:09:58 <wens> this hardware is 20+ years old. 09:09:59 <iwamatsu> wens: I see. I will ask about this to Siemens. 09:10:04 <iwamatsu> haha 09:10:29 <wens> that's all from me 09:10:33 <pave1> Agreed. It would be nice if Siemens cleaned up their config. It seems they simply neabled everything. 09:10:36 <pave1> enabled. 09:11:13 <masashi910> wens, iwamatsu, pave1: Thanks. Hmmm. 09:11:37 <patersonc> pave1: It's a bit hard to predict what future customers would want supported though? 09:12:11 <pave1> patersonc: Well... Noone uses Sun keyboard. Certainly noone uses it for embedded project. 09:12:24 <pave1> Kernel has drivers for a lots of obsolete hardware. 09:12:29 <patersonc> heh fair enough ;) 09:12:52 <masashi910> Any other topics? 09:13:03 <masashi910> 3 09:13:08 <masashi910> 2 09:13:13 <masashi910> 1 09:13:16 <masashi910> #topic Kernel testing 09:13:50 <patersonc> Not a huge amount from me (as usual) 09:14:05 <patersonc> Tristan from Codethink has offered to help me out, which is great :) 09:14:20 <patersonc> So hopefully there will be some more movement in the coming weeks 09:14:47 <patersonc> Is anyone having any issues with the test infrastructure? 09:14:54 <patersonc> Any new requirements? 09:15:05 <pave1> patersonc: Well.. :-) 09:15:28 <pave1> Having green ticks for just the situation where the tests passed would be nice. 09:15:55 <pave1> As would be really starting realtime tests, including failures when latencies grow over 150usec on Altera board. 09:15:56 <patersonc> Yea. However I plan to use a KernelCI instance for that 09:15:57 <pave1> :-) 09:16:57 <pave1> Oh, btw. 09:17:24 <pave1> In future -rt team should start publishing prerelease versions of the -rt patches in git somewhere. 09:17:41 <pave1> It would be very good to test them, in a same way we test -stable. 09:17:54 <patersonc> Sure 09:18:26 <patersonc> Let me know when they start 09:18:59 <pave1> I hope they let me know :-). But yes, I believe I'll learn, eventually. 09:19:26 <masashi910> patersonc: That's great that Tristan-san joined to work on testing! Also, thanks for your works. 09:19:33 <masashi910> any other topics? 09:19:46 <masashi910> 3 09:19:49 <masashi910> 2 09:19:54 <masashi910> 1 09:19:57 <masashi910> #topic CIP Security 09:20:09 <yoshidak[m]> 1. Development process requirements 09:20:35 <yoshidak[m]> Requests to each working group regarding the development process are currently being summarized at SWG weekly meeting. 09:21:11 <yoshidak[m]> In some cases, a few questions have already been asked individually, but we will set up a meeting after completed to summarize, so please wait for a while. 09:21:20 <yoshidak[m]> 2. Security features gap assessment 09:21:51 <yoshidak[m]> No update today, because the review meeting w/ Exida that originally planned at the last Friday was skipped to this week. 09:21:58 <yoshidak[m]> That's all from me. 09:22:05 <masashi910> yoshidak[m]: Thanks for your works! 09:22:17 <masashi910> any queries? 09:22:32 <masashi910> 3 09:22:36 <masashi910> 2 09:22:40 <masashi910> 1 09:22:43 <masashi910> #topic AOB 09:22:55 <masashi910> Are there any business to discuss? 09:23:47 <masashi910> If there are no topics, then, let's close the meeting. 09:23:54 <masashi910> #endmeeting