09:00:00 #startmeeting CIP IRC weekly meeting 09:00:00 Meeting started Thu Nov 12 09:00:00 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is masashi910. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 09:00:00 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 09:00:00 The meeting name has been set to 'cip_irc_weekly_meeting' 09:00:03 #topic rollcall 09:00:11 please say hi if you're around 09:00:18 hi 09:00:21 hi 09:00:23 hi 09:00:24 hi 09:00:27 hi 09:00:34 hi 09:00:37 Let's get started. 09:00:44 #topic AI review 09:00:50 1. Combine root filesystem with kselftest binary - iwamatsu 09:01:21 I dont have a upodate about it. 09:01:30 iwamatsu: Noted. Thanks. 09:01:33 2. Check whether CVE-2019-0145, CVE-2019-0147, CVE-2019-0148 needs to be backported to 4.4 - Kernel Team 09:01:41 Based on the discussion last week, I sent out an email to cip-dev saying that we are ignoring these patches. 09:01:48 Ben-san responded as follows. 09:01:56 https://lore.kernel.org/cip-dev/9c52fda6f710d3aad6fd9f781b33c4034dee4d10.camel@codethink.co.uk/T/#t 09:02:03 Iwamatsu-san prepared some patches to be reviewed by contributors from Intel. 09:02:08 iwamatsu: Thanks for your work. Could you proceed to ask them for patch reviews? 09:02:45 I dont have a upodate about it. 09:02:52 OK 09:03:03 oh sorry. 09:05:17 iwamatsu: Let me confirm. Is it OK for you to proceed your patches? As a first step is it to ask Intel contributors for their review? 09:06:02 masashi910: I will send patches with RFC. 09:06:36 iwamatsu: Thanks very much! Then, I will keep this AI open for a while. Thanks! 09:06:49 Any other topics? 09:07:03 3 09:07:07 2 09:07:10 1 09:07:14 #topic Kernel maintenance updates 09:07:36 I have reviewed patches queued for 4.19.156. 09:08:01 I reviewed 4.4.243 and 244-rc 09:08:08 I already sent out report to ML, but to summarize: 4 new issues this week, nothing needs to be done as far as CIP is concerned 09:08:44 pave1, iwamatsu, wens: Thanks for your works! 09:08:49 iwamatsu: we could consider removing SUNKBD from 4.4.y-cip-rt/x86/siemens_i386-rt.config. I doubt anyone is really using this. 09:09:58 this hardware is 20+ years old. 09:09:59 wens: I see. I will ask about this to Siemens. 09:10:04 haha 09:10:29 that's all from me 09:10:33 Agreed. It would be nice if Siemens cleaned up their config. It seems they simply neabled everything. 09:10:36 enabled. 09:11:13 wens, iwamatsu, pave1: Thanks. Hmmm. 09:11:37 pave1: It's a bit hard to predict what future customers would want supported though? 09:12:11 patersonc: Well... Noone uses Sun keyboard. Certainly noone uses it for embedded project. 09:12:24 Kernel has drivers for a lots of obsolete hardware. 09:12:29 heh fair enough ;) 09:12:52 Any other topics? 09:13:03 3 09:13:08 2 09:13:13 1 09:13:16 #topic Kernel testing 09:13:50 Not a huge amount from me (as usual) 09:14:05 Tristan from Codethink has offered to help me out, which is great :) 09:14:20 So hopefully there will be some more movement in the coming weeks 09:14:47 Is anyone having any issues with the test infrastructure? 09:14:54 Any new requirements? 09:15:05 patersonc: Well.. :-) 09:15:28 Having green ticks for just the situation where the tests passed would be nice. 09:15:55 As would be really starting realtime tests, including failures when latencies grow over 150usec on Altera board. 09:15:56 Yea. However I plan to use a KernelCI instance for that 09:15:57 :-) 09:16:57 Oh, btw. 09:17:24 In future -rt team should start publishing prerelease versions of the -rt patches in git somewhere. 09:17:41 It would be very good to test them, in a same way we test -stable. 09:17:54 Sure 09:18:26 Let me know when they start 09:18:59 I hope they let me know :-). But yes, I believe I'll learn, eventually. 09:19:26 patersonc: That's great that Tristan-san joined to work on testing! Also, thanks for your works. 09:19:33 any other topics? 09:19:46 3 09:19:49 2 09:19:54 1 09:19:57 #topic CIP Security 09:20:09 1. Development process requirements 09:20:35 Requests to each working group regarding the development process are currently being summarized at SWG weekly meeting. 09:21:11 In some cases, a few questions have already been asked individually, but we will set up a meeting after completed to summarize, so please wait for a while. 09:21:20 2. Security features gap assessment 09:21:51 No update today, because the review meeting w/ Exida that originally planned at the last Friday was skipped to this week. 09:21:58 That's all from me. 09:22:05 yoshidak[m]: Thanks for your works! 09:22:17 any queries? 09:22:32 3 09:22:36 2 09:22:40 1 09:22:43 #topic AOB 09:22:55 Are there any business to discuss? 09:23:47 If there are no topics, then, let's close the meeting. 09:23:54 #endmeeting