13:01:37 <jki> #startmeeting CIP IRC weekly meeting 13:01:37 <brlogger> Meeting started Thu Sep 16 13:01:37 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is jki. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:01:37 <brlogger> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 13:01:37 <brlogger> The meeting name has been set to 'cip_irc_weekly_meeting' 13:01:47 <jki> #topic rollcall 13:01:52 <jki> hi all! 13:01:58 <iwamatsu_> hi! 13:02:02 <uli> hi 13:02:04 <alicef> hi 13:02:07 <masami> hi 13:02:13 <josiah|2> hi 13:03:24 <jki> so, pavel is on the road - chris is missing? 13:04:06 <jki> but let's start nevertheless 13:04:09 <jki> #topic AI review 13:04:39 <jki> 1. Combine root filesystem with kselftest binary - iwamatsu & alicef 13:04:47 <alicef> no updates 13:04:49 <iwamatsu_> no update from me. 13:05:14 <jki> keep it as AI? 13:05:48 <alicef> ? 13:06:02 <alicef> you mean merge this in the IA topic ? 13:06:07 <alicef> AI 13:06:22 <jki> i mean does this remain an AI for us, just one that will take more time? 13:07:20 <alicef> what is AI ? 13:07:25 <jki> Action Item 13:07:50 <jki> and something we should revisit on every meeting - at least my understanding of this 13:08:01 <alicef> yes last week was KernelCI hackfest and I worked at the merge of CIP testing with KernelCI 13:08:28 <jki> then we actually have news here, great 13:08:33 <alicef> that's why there are no updates on the this 13:08:52 <jki> ah, ok, this will build on top 13:09:35 <jki> ok, next 13:09:40 <jki> 2. Document new LAVA domains in wiki - patersonc 13:10:01 <alicef> sorry I got a regression on upstream kernels and I have to keep a eye also there 13:10:21 <jki> no problem! 13:10:56 <jki> ok, wiki not yet updated 13:11:11 <jki> any new AIs we should add here? 13:12:06 <jki> 3 13:12:09 <jki> 2 13:12:10 <jki> 1 13:12:15 <jki> #topic Kernel maintenance updates 13:12:56 <iwamatsu_> I reviewed 4.4.284-rc, 5.10.64 and 65. 13:13:07 <uli> reviewing for 5.10.65 13:13:09 <masami> I have CVE summary. There is 4 new CVEs in this week. 13:13:15 <masami> CVE-2021-3744, CVE-2021-3764, CVE-2021-3752, CVE-2021-38300 are new CVEs. 13:14:48 <jki> question for my understanding: when you review and do not find anything, is that recorded somewhere as well? 13:16:11 <iwamatsu_> We managed it to lts-commit-list repo. 13:16:28 <iwamatsu_> https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-kernel/lts-commit-list 13:16:46 <jki> so, upstream lts does not take extra review-by tags, does it? 13:17:35 <iwamatsu_> That is not done for each commit. 13:18:04 <jki> ok, but we have at least our records, good 13:19:05 <iwamatsu_> If there is a problem, we will comment on the patch. For example, this requires additional patches. 13:19:50 <jki> sure, that I expected - provided you are fast enough for Greg 13:20:43 <jki> anything else for this topic block? 13:21:12 <jki> 3 13:21:14 <jki> 2 13:21:17 <jki> 1 13:21:22 <jki> #topic Kernel testing 13:21:40 <jki> according to Chris (just found his email), no news here 13:21:45 <alicef> sorry I'm masking gentoo kernels for a posix cpu regression 13:22:01 <alicef> anyway we had hackfest kernelci last week 13:22:07 <jki> ok 13:22:28 <alicef> I think we had updates on the CIP tsc about it from chris 13:22:42 <jki> right 13:22:55 <jki> that was what he meant 13:22:56 <alicef> we recently had merged the cip configurations pull request on kernelci 13:23:47 <alicef> is working only for 4.19 at the moment and in qemu 13:24:07 <alicef> not yet filtered it to each board 13:24:39 <alicef> but still we have something working with the cip configurations 13:24:56 <jki> that's good, indeed 13:25:09 <alicef> the efforts on the iec cybersecurity test and cip core are going on 13:26:07 <alicef> This is one example https://staging.kernelci.org/build/id/6137240c428e1b1b5136a8f5/ 13:26:22 <alicef> working with cip://4.19.y-cip/arm64/qemu_arm64_defconfig 13:26:46 <alicef> that is a configurtion taken from https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-kernel/cip-kernel-config 13:27:24 <jki> that was built by kernelci, not via isar-cip-core, right? 13:27:39 <alicef> affermative 13:27:56 <alicef> we are pushing cip-core to the kernelci fileserver 13:28:02 <alicef> by the kernelci api 13:28:11 <alicef> but we are not yet using it 13:28:30 <alicef> I'm fixing kernelci for make it work with cip-core tarball 13:28:49 <alicef> you can get it from here https://storage.staging.kernelci.org/images/rootfs/cip/ 13:29:07 <alicef> https://storage.staging.kernelci.org/images/rootfs/cip/20210910/ 13:29:34 <jki> ok 13:30:08 <alicef> sorry need to go back masking gentoo kernels packages 13:30:14 <alicef> that's all for me 13:30:27 <jki> thanks a lot! 13:30:36 <jki> then let's move on 13:30:50 <jki> #topic AOB 13:31:37 <jki> I have one: will be OOO the next two weeks 13:31:46 <alicef> ah one thing 13:31:46 <jki> can anyone take over? 13:31:51 <alicef> sorry 13:32:05 <jki> go ahead 13:32:20 <alicef> kernelci is writing the blog about the hackfest #2 https://static.staging.kernelci.org/blog/posts/2021/hackfests/ 13:32:57 <alicef> if someone is interested on the work done during KernelCI hackfest and it also reference to CIP 13:33:12 <jki> that's nice 13:33:37 <jki> Chris should drop a note on that on next TSC call as well 13:33:44 <alicef> sorry for the interruption please go on 13:34:30 <jki> ok, I need a deputy to run the next two irc meetings 13:35:55 <iwamatsu_> OK, I can takeover. 13:36:11 <jki> that would be great - TIA! 13:36:21 <iwamatsu_> but I do not know how to use meeting tool. 13:36:46 <jki> I can drop you the notes kudo-san shared with me 13:37:05 <iwamatsu_> ok, thanks! 13:37:06 <jki> it's just a few magic markers to feed the logging bot 13:38:00 <jki> anything else for AOB? 13:38:26 <jki> everyone with sufficient access by now? 13:38:27 <masami> I have one 13:38:36 <jki> go ahead 13:38:43 <masami> ok. I was asked about CVSS score last week 13:38:50 <masami> so, is it helpful if CVSS score is in the CVE report? to know CVE's severity 13:39:55 <jki> I suppose we would have two consumer groups here: us as kernel maintainers and then our users 13:40:14 <jki> who do you have in mind to benifit from this score? 13:41:27 <masami> jki: cip kernel users will have benefit 13:41:52 <masami> it easy to understand CVE's impact 13:42:34 <jki> ok. how much extra effort this would mean when adding it? 13:44:08 <masami> it needs a bit extra work. but easy task. 13:45:02 <jki> just initially extra work, or also on each CVE? 13:47:08 <masami> I think adding CVSS score to weekly report, so usually initially extra work. 13:47:42 <jki> otherwise, it sounds like a good proposal to me at least 13:47:53 <jki> other thoughts on this? 13:48:17 <masami> thanks! 13:49:23 <jki> thanks for your initiative! 13:49:32 <jki> anything else for today? 13:50:17 <jki> 3 13:50:20 <jki> 2 13:50:23 <jki> 1 13:50:37 <jki> thank you all, and enjoy the rest of today! 13:50:39 <jki> #endmeeting