13:08:06 <alicef> #startmeeting CIP IRC weekly meeting 13:08:06 <brlogger> Meeting started Thu Jan 6 13:08:06 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is alicef. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:08:06 <brlogger> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 13:08:06 <brlogger> The meeting name has been set to 'cip_irc_weekly_meeting' 13:08:14 <alicef> hi everyone! 13:08:19 <alicef> ok, let's get started 13:08:38 <alicef> let's take presences 13:08:42 <alicef> o/ 13:08:47 <uli> present 13:09:04 <patersonc[m]> hi 13:09:25 <alicef> iwamatsu ? pav31 ? masami ? 13:09:55 <masami> this week, CVE-2021-4197 is new CVE. Patch is available but not merged into the mainline yet. 13:10:18 <pav31> hi 13:10:26 <masami> hi 13:10:28 <alicef> masami: we are still at the presence :) 13:10:42 <alicef> ok, let's get started 13:10:51 <alicef> #topic AI review 13:11:04 <masami> oops 13:11:10 <alicef> 1. Review / integrate kernelci patches into isar-cip-core - jan 13:11:23 <alicef> masami: np 13:11:48 <alicef> we need to wait jan for this, so let's skip this for now 13:12:09 <alicef> 2. Propose tweet on KernelCI-CIP collaboration progress - alicef 13:12:59 <alicef> skip, still work in progress 13:13:08 <alicef> 3. Clarify with KernelCI whether CIP maintainers can get accounts - alicef 13:14:17 <alicef> still work in progress with kernelci 13:15:30 <alicef> #topic Kernel maintenance updates 13:16:09 <masami> CVE-2021-4197 is new CVE in this week. Patch is available but not merged into the mainline yet. 13:16:18 <pav31> I was reviewing 5.10.89 and 90. 13:16:34 <uli> reviewed 5.10.87 13:18:07 <alicef> any problem upon review ? 13:19:05 <uli> the review pages that iwamatsu-san's script is supposed to create don't actually exist in the wiki 13:19:11 <pav31> Usual "half of this should not be in stable", nothing 13:19:20 <pav31> to worry about. 13:20:03 <alicef> i see 13:20:06 <pav31> Oh and rcar audio and adc series. 13:20:55 <alicef> uli maybe try to work with iwamatsu-san for the wiki script 13:21:18 <uli> i sent an e-mail already, but i guess he's not back at work yet 13:21:19 <alicef> rcar audio and adc series had problems or you reviewed ? 13:21:37 <pav31> Both :-). 13:21:46 <alicef> uli: we just got back from holiday :) 13:21:59 <alicef> pav31: eh :/ 13:22:20 <pav31> Adc parts are okay, audio has strange locking. 13:23:39 <alicef> how do you test for rcar audio and adc series? is that part of the gitlab tests ? 13:24:21 <alicef> or are you talking about the patches you reviewed ? 13:25:11 <jki> argh, missed my own reminder - anyone around? 13:25:20 <alicef> pav31:sorry I bit didn't understand 13:25:28 <alicef> jki: np 13:25:55 <alicef> we already started the meeting. currently we are at the kernel maintenance updates 13:26:10 <jki> perfect! 13:26:43 <jki> it's public holiday here in Bavaria, to my excuse ;) 13:26:59 <alicef> pav31: was talking about adc parts that are ok and audio that has strange locking 13:27:23 <alicef> i suppose the patch have strange locking 13:27:46 <alicef> jki: happy holiday if so :) 13:28:01 <alicef> what holiday you have in Bavaria ? 13:28:26 <uli> three kings day 13:28:58 <alicef> pave1 have bad connection probably :/ 13:29:08 <pave1> yep, sorry 13:29:35 <alicef> never hear of such holiday, should be fun :) 13:30:02 <alicef> pave1: can you explain a bit about the strange locking? couldn't understand too much 13:30:15 <alicef> sorry 13:30:28 <pave1> thats hard to explain over irc. 13:30:49 <alicef> is it on the mailing list ? 13:31:00 <pave1> It is on the list. 13:31:18 <alicef> ok I will check the 5.10.y patches later again :) 13:31:39 <alicef> any other info to talk here ? 13:31:50 <pave1> That's renesas series on cip-dev, not 5.10. 13:32:07 <alicef> I see! thanks! 13:32:39 <alicef> anything else ? can we move on? 13:32:58 <alicef> 3 13:33:10 <alicef> 2 13:33:31 <alicef> 1 13:33:40 <alicef> #topic Kernel testing 13:34:14 <alicef> I have no updates this week. 13:34:36 <alicef> patersonc[m]: ? 13:34:52 <alicef> any update ? 13:35:12 <patersonc[m]> Devices in lab-cip-denx seems to be offline, sorry for the pain 13:35:47 <alicef> is ok, thanks for pointing it out 13:35:54 <patersonc[m]> iwamatsu: I could do with a review on https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-cip-ci/-/merge_requests/39 if you get a chance 13:36:32 <patersonc[m]> Not sure I have anything else 13:36:36 <jki> patersonc[m]: denx is aware of the issue already? 13:36:57 <patersonc[m]> jki: I sent an email to the lab maintainer 13:37:07 <alicef> patersonc[m]: nice 13:37:22 <jki> ok - he's possibly on holiday today... 13:37:51 <alicef> about the MR why going with cip-core when I think we decided to use isar-cip-core? 13:38:16 <patersonc[m]> Sure 13:39:34 <alicef> any reson for this ? 13:39:39 <alicef> reason 13:39:48 <patersonc[m]> As in a naming convention? 13:40:07 <alicef> is actually isar-cip-core but named cip-core? 13:41:10 <alicef> ah you are right 13:41:11 <patersonc[m]> It add support to use isar-cip-core 13:41:24 <alicef> isar cip-core is named cip-core :) 13:41:48 <patersonc[m]> It's an MR I started a long time back 13:41:59 <patersonc[m]> Just got around to bringing it up to date a few weeks ago 13:42:00 <jki> the image is called cip-core, the layer to build it isar-cip-core 13:42:01 <alicef> from what I could see now, looks nice 13:42:11 <alicef> yes I see that is 1yr old 13:43:13 <alicef> that's one of the reason moving to kernelci could be a good thing :/ 13:43:23 <patersonc[m]> :) 13:43:24 <alicef> as we have more people reviewing MR 13:44:23 <alicef> changing topic, I worked at a presentation for Linux conf au 2022 13:45:23 <alicef> is bit similar to the OSS presentation about the merge of CIP testing into KernelCI 13:46:15 <alicef> any other question or any other topic about kernel maintenance updates? 13:47:20 <alicef> 3 13:47:23 <alicef> 2 13:47:29 <alicef> 1 13:47:42 <alicef> jki_: still here ? 13:47:51 <jki_> yes 13:48:03 <jki_> network change 13:48:14 <alicef> ok I'm rewinding up to your topic before going to AOB 13:48:22 <alicef> is it ok ? 13:48:35 <jki_> which topic? 13:49:00 <alicef> the patch on isar-cip-core 13:49:17 <jki_> yeah, I still need to review them 13:49:32 <jki_> just dropped first feedback to tell the series apart 13:49:55 <alicef> yes I know I didn't version it 13:50:28 <alicef> do you need it versioned or you can work with that what you have now and versioning next time? 13:50:44 <alicef> #topic AI review 13:50:55 <alicef> 1. Review / integrate kernelci patches into isar-cip-core - jan 13:51:04 <alicef> versioning 13:51:11 <alicef> jki_: do you need it versioned or you can work with that what you have now and versioning next time? 13:51:38 <jki_> now that you confirmed the relationship, i can work with that 13:52:01 <jki_> will drop some more feedback soon 13:52:19 <alicef> I what not sure that you was using patch version. some projects does some other don't 13:52:30 <alicef> I was 13:52:35 <alicef> ok thanks you 13:52:58 <alicef> this version is better divided ? 13:52:59 <jki_> most projects I know do when working via email 13:53:51 <jki_> let me look through it, will let you know 13:54:00 <alicef> ok 13:54:10 <alicef> thanks you 13:54:18 <alicef> so let's move on 13:54:22 <alicef> 3 13:54:27 <alicef> 2 13:54:32 <alicef> 1 13:54:38 <alicef> #topic AOB 13:54:44 <alicef> vacations and lockdowns? 13:54:52 <alicef> other than three kings 13:54:57 <alicef> :) 13:55:08 <patersonc[m]> All done now 13:55:57 <jki_> I might be off next-but-one week, but planning is tough these days 13:56:17 <jki_> will let you know 13:56:22 <alicef> yes also here we shouldn't have any more holidays in Thursday 13:56:52 <alicef> jki_: ok thanks you, send a email or ping me here. and I can take over 13:57:22 <alicef> anything else? 13:57:39 <alicef> 5 13:57:46 <jki_> alicef: great, TIA! 13:57:46 <alicef> 4 13:57:51 <alicef> 3 13:57:55 <alicef> 2 13:57:58 <alicef> 1 13:58:04 <alicef> ok, then let's close for today 13:58:17 <alicef> #endmeeting