13:02:30 #startmeeting CIP IRC weekly meeting 13:02:30 Meeting started Thu Feb 15 13:02:30 2024 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is jki. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:02:30 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 13:02:30 The meeting name has been set to 'cip_irc_weekly_meeting' 13:02:38 #topic AI review 13:02:47 - prepare blog entry on SLTS kernel state and challenges [Jan] 13:02:48 hi! 13:03:07 started, but still some way - will request feedback when ready 13:03:14 other AIs? 13:03:39 3 13:03:40 2 13:03:42 1 13:03:44 #topic Kernel maintenance updates 13:04:07 This week reported 7 new CVEs and 2 updated CVEs. 13:04:09 i'm still reviewing 6.1.75 13:04:15 I was reviewing 6.1.77 and .78 13:05:04 I reviewed 6.1.77, and preparating release 4.19.y-cip tree 13:06:44 anything else? 13:07:01 5 13:07:03 4 13:07:05 3 13:07:06 2 13:07:08 1 13:07:11 #topic Kernel release status 13:07:29 so, just 4.19-cip is delayed, but under preparation, right? 13:07:44 yes 13:08:12 ok, then we could already move on... 13:08:19 5 13:08:20 4 13:08:22 3 13:08:23 2 13:08:24 1 13:08:26 #topic Kernel testing 13:09:56 nothing? 13:09:57 From the last meetin -- could we stop broadcasting testing emails 13:09:59 I look into the kernelci api and pratically for working is getting a yaml file like in the example: https://github.com/kernelci/kernelci-pipeline/blob/e79e3743c2caeb106b99e7eaabd5904d0bca950f/config/pipeline.yaml#L200 13:11:25 the way is working is same to the current kernelci configuration but I couldn't reproduce anything useful yet 13:11:33 pavel: as chris is not here, we will have to reschedule this topic again 13:11:42 I got the staging acctount today and will try with that 13:12:32 arisut: what was the goal again? sorry, forgot about that 13:13:30 see if we can use kernelci api for requesting new build directly from the api with a cip account 13:13:46 ah, ok 13:14:23 and see what we can do with the new kernelci core api as is yet on development 13:15:09 so that we can maybe send request for making it better 13:15:46 but my task is just see if we can use it and see what we can do with it 13:16:56 great, I'm sure they will like to hear early feedback as well! 13:17:38 so if someone else want to try it feel free to send a account request on github 13:17:47 I've chatted these days with Daniel W. about kernelci and -rt testing 13:17:52 https://kernelci.org/docs/api/early-access/ 13:18:03 there is still not much, as I've noticed (again) 13:18:19 but two improvements are insight: 13:18:33 - he wants to enable more rt-tests soon 13:18:34 feel free to open issues on the github 13:18:39 about that 13:19:11 - kernelci is working on UX improvements that should once allow to show trends in measurements 13:19:45 https://kernelci.org/blog/posts/2023/ux-analysis/ 13:20:32 once we can collect those, it will also be important to improve the background stress for -rt 13:20:38 it's just hackbench... 13:21:06 what are we doing in the CIP labs? 13:24:32 probably only chris knows ;) 13:24:47 ok - anything else on testing? 13:25:53 5 13:25:55 4 13:25:56 3 13:25:58 2 13:26:00 1 13:26:05 #topic AOB 13:26:26 kernel is now CNA, more CVE assignments to come - any impact for us expected? 13:27:00 I mean on workflows and daily business 13:27:34 I think it doesn't change our workflow. 13:28:14 I don't think so. 13:28:30 I mean -- I don't expect impact. 13:28:36 good - was my expectation as well 13:29:01 the fuzz will be elsewhere - popcorn time, as lwn.net wrote 13:30:57 found our -rt test case by now: https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-cip-ci/-/blob/master/lava_templates/test_cyclictest+hackbench.yaml 13:31:06 not that different from kernelci 13:31:41 anyway, we arent't alone here 13:31:49 any other business for today? 13:32:40 5 13:32:42 4 13:32:44 3 13:32:45 2 13:32:47 1 13:32:49 #endmeeting