12:00:56 <jki> #startmeeting CIP IRC weekly meeting
12:00:56 <collab-meetbot`> Meeting started Thu May  7 12:00:56 2026 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is jki. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
12:00:56 <collab-meetbot`> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
12:00:56 <collab-meetbot`> The meeting name has been set to 'cip_irc_weekly_meeting'
12:01:01 <jki> #topic AI review
12:01:06 <jki> <empty>
12:01:13 <jki> 5
12:01:14 <jki> 4
12:01:16 <jki> 3
12:01:17 <jki> 2
12:01:18 <jki> 1
12:01:20 <jki> #topic Kernel maintenance updates
12:01:32 <masami> This week reported 389 new CVEs and 3 updated CVEs.
12:01:38 <pave1> I had fun with copy fail.
12:01:42 <uli_> i just released 4.19
12:01:55 <jki> perfect timing :)
12:02:05 <pave1> Plus reviews - 6.12.85, 86
12:02:25 <jki> (iwamatsu-san) I reviewed 6.12.81, and I am reviewing .82.
12:03:14 <jki> further topics?
12:03:33 <jki> 5
12:03:35 <jki> 4
12:03:37 <jki> 3
12:03:38 <jki> 2
12:03:40 <jki> 1
12:03:43 <jki> #topic Kernel release status
12:04:00 <jki> most fresh now, all gree
12:04:15 <jki> are there any -rt kernels left without copy-fail fix?
12:04:24 <pave1> 4.19-rt should be easy to do now.
12:04:48 <pave1> plus 6.1-rt misses that.
12:05:11 <jki> but 6.1-rt lacks a match?
12:05:16 <pave1> Suitable upstream was not there last time.
12:05:33 <pave1> I may have to fo without it.
12:05:40 <pave1> to do
12:05:50 <jki> ok, good
12:06:14 <jki> anything else?
12:06:33 <jki> 5
12:06:35 <jki> 4
12:06:37 <jki> 3
12:06:39 <jki> 2
12:06:41 <jki> 1
12:06:43 <jki> #topic Kernel testing
12:07:03 <patersonc> No news from me
12:07:05 <arisut> no updates for me
12:07:13 <arisut> working for Linux plumbers
12:07:29 <pave1> 7.0-stable testing would be nice
12:07:44 <patersonc> oh yea - will add today
12:07:56 <pave1> great, thanks!
12:09:19 <jki> patersonc: I've raised the Prague lab topic internally as well
12:09:34 <patersonc> Thanks
12:10:12 <jki> more testing topics?
12:10:30 <jki> 5
12:10:32 <jki> 4
12:10:34 <jki> 3
12:10:35 <jki> 2
12:10:37 <jki> 1
12:10:39 <jki> #topic AOB
12:11:01 <jki> rt arm backport - any remarks already?
12:11:30 <pave1> surprisingly simple st the first look.
12:11:39 <pave1> at
12:11:58 <jki> I hope it stays like that ;)
12:12:07 <pave1> yep
12:12:30 <pave1> From my side -- there may have been
12:13:02 <pave1> warning of copy fail vulnerability by having high cvss score.
12:13:35 <pave1> Most cves have no score, so that area may be worth watching.
12:14:16 <jki> there is coverage of this issue on LWN as well, specifically how the embargo went
12:14:23 <jki> ...not well
12:14:37 <jki> AI fun
12:14:54 <pave1> yep. theres more in the pipeline
12:15:22 <pave1> is article behind paywall?
12:15:26 <jki> problem is that the pipeline may become more like a ring to jump through in no time
12:15:37 <jki> yes, still subscribers only
12:15:50 <jki> can share a link privately if you are interested
12:16:00 <pave1> yes please.
12:17:39 <jki> done
12:17:45 <jki> to all here
12:17:49 <pave1> thanks!
12:17:54 <jki> other topics?
12:18:09 <pave1> for the defconfig updates
12:18:20 <pave1> ...we can do that.
12:18:47 <pave1> ...but if it is really config for single board
12:18:58 <jki> it should be, yes
12:19:18 <pave1> it would be less long term work if they pruned it down
12:19:33 <jki> yes, will tell them
12:19:46 <jki> and so far, this is no official submission, just a dry run
12:19:50 <jki> they are not member yet
12:19:56 <pave1> aha, ok
12:20:12 <jki> they like to understand if this would work if they were
12:20:22 <jki> or how much CIP needs to invest on top
12:20:29 <pave1> we likely have ton of unused stuff in configs
12:20:36 <jki> I'm sure
12:20:52 <pave1> already, but that's not reason to
12:21:00 <pave1> make it worse.
12:21:40 <jki> yes, we do have and should maintain your quality gate on config MRs
12:22:12 <jki> already because it is sometimes hard to recover why something was proposed 5 years ago :)
12:23:24 <pave1> yep. keeping explanations why each option is needed might be useful
12:24:22 <jki> at least push-back / questioning on suspicious ones - one-by-one arguing is not realistic
12:25:50 <jki> anything else?
12:26:45 <jki> 5
12:26:47 <jki> 4
12:26:49 <jki> 3
12:26:50 <jki> 2
12:26:52 <jki> 1
12:26:53 <jki> #endmeeting