12:00:44 #startmeeting CIP IRC weekly meeting 12:00:44 Meeting started Thu Jul 2 12:00:44 2026 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is jki. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 12:00:44 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 12:00:44 The meeting name has been set to 'cip_irc_weekly_meeting' 12:00:51 #topic AI review 12:01:01 none recorded 12:01:10 5 12:01:12 4 12:01:14 3 12:01:16 2 12:01:18 1 12:01:20 #topic Kernel maintenance updates 12:01:30 i'm working on 4.4 12:01:31 This week reported 226 new CVEs and 5 updated CVEs. 12:02:28 not everyone online yet / today 12:03:06 nevertheless - anything to add? 12:03:25 5 12:03:27 4 12:03:29 3 12:03:31 2 12:03:34 1 12:03:36 #topic Kernel release status 12:03:46 all releases on time 12:03:54 hello 12:04:01 hi! 12:04:21 iwamatsu: anything to add to maintenance topics? 12:04:41 I reviewed 6.12.92. 12:05:12 release-wise, any issues ahead? 12:05:28 5 12:05:30 4 12:05:32 3 12:05:35 2 12:05:37 1 12:05:40 #topic Kernel testing 12:06:06 I fixed the stable testing. Sorry about that 12:06:22 kci-dev currently have two projects on the way one is to have a api python library, and the second is to use kci-dev with a mcp 12:06:41 currently both projects are in phase of been reviewed 12:07:00 MCP for AI analysis of results? 12:07:15 patersonc, yes 12:07:23 Nice 12:08:07 you can read the documentation here if you are interested https://github.com/kernelci/kci-dev/pull/278/changes/071cd2cdeafcbb17d3b148acb5e8eaa6141088d1 12:08:13 will the AI then also fix our lab hickups? :) 12:08:34 jki, no 12:08:40 Ha 12:09:39 who will run that AI then, kernelci themselves? 12:10:07 and reports will go to where? Or do users have to direct their own agents to that mcp? 12:10:22 we are discussing to have a mcp server where to connect but still is under discussion 12:11:54 sounds still interesting, we should keep this on the radar and possibly play with it 12:11:54 do you mean KernelCI results analized by mcp reports ? 12:12:10 could even work with certain local models then, I guess 12:12:17 yes 12:12:45 yeah, I was wondering if this becomes a kind of Sashiko for KernelCI results 12:12:51 as-a-service 12:13:09 not sure about that 12:14:37 does not look like, based on reading the doc you shared 12:15:10 neverming, it can still be useful and is a step for automated triaging as well 12:15:25 yeah currently doesn't not sure about the future, that what i was trying to say 12:15:46 Lots of possibilities 12:16:45 more testing topics? 12:17:09 btw, Munich lab green again 12:17:16 Thanks 12:17:59 5 12:18:01 4 12:18:03 3 12:18:05 2 12:18:07 1 12:18:10 #topic AOB 12:18:25 two topics from my side: 12:18:39 Sorry for being late. I was reviewing 6.12.94. I will be travelling next week. 12:18:56 - tarball download for CIP is broken, I contacted the admin, no reply so far 12:19:18 pavel: thanks! 12:19:47 - kernel WG is also asked to write a blog post as part of the 10-years-of-CIP series 12:20:18 anyone interested in contributing or leading this? 12:20:52 Do you have any idea of what it should be about? 12:21:18 contribution can already be throwing in some bullet points of "should be covered" topics 12:21:45 I would say, it should definitely summerized what our WG is doing 12:22:16 and then some thoughts about what we plan to improve 12:22:41 but some insight into how maintenance work could be nice as well... 12:22:42 When is the deadline? 12:22:56 I have not yet committed us to any date 12:23:05 let me check the roadmap again... 12:24:10 last committed date is August 4, then the next still free slot would be August 18 12:24:22 post should be ready one week before that 12:24:34 but I would also not mind doing that a bit later ;) 12:26:12 I think this is a good opportunity to consolidate our work and put it into writing... 12:26:31 indeed 12:26:32 I’ll give it a first draft. However, please feel free to share your thoughts and opinions.;-) 12:27:00 iwamatsu: thanks a lot already for taking the lead! 12:27:24 how about creating a google docs page and share the link? 12:27:53 I will definitely support here 12:28:13 sounds good it. 12:28:43 When I create a draft by google doc, I will share. 12:29:02 I can also do that, directly in our CIP WG folder 12:29:18 will drop the link via email later 12:29:50 further topics for today? 12:31:50 5 12:31:52 4 12:31:54 3 12:31:56 2 12:31:58 1 12:32:00 #endmeeting