#lfn-meeting: tac
Meeting started by dfarrell07 at 14:00:10 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
-
- TAC members please #info in (dfarrell07,
14:00:34)
- Daniel Farrell (dfarrell07,
14:00:39)
- edwarnicke (edwarnicke,
14:00:49)
- Greg Elkinbard (GregElkinbard,
14:00:52)
- Xiaojun Xie (Xiaojun,
14:01:32)
- Tim Irnich (timirnich,
14:03:26)
- Greg asks about the TF induction (CaseyLF,
14:07:09)
- Casey said there must be at least a 2 week
review. It has not been 2 weeks review. (CaseyLF,
14:08:09)
- Daniel also noted that the automated checks for
the gerrit patch are failing. (CaseyLF,
14:08:31)
- Tapio Tallgren (ttallgren,
14:11:37)
- Rossella Sblendido (rossella_s,
14:11:47)
- ACTION: dfarrell07 to
clarify in induction document that we expect automated checks to be
passing (so can even build HTML) and clear, dedicated-subject email
constitute announcing doc to start review (dfarrell07,
14:11:55)
- Anders Rosengren (anders_,
14:16:41)
- ACTION: edwarnicke to
clarify COB scope wording per timirnich and dfarrell07 feedback to
not require co-location (ie OPNFV Plugfests) (dfarrell07,
14:28:06)
- discussion about how there are two budget
processes going on - LF-driven, in-law process; info-gathering,
still-not-accepted CBO process (dfarrell07,
14:28:47)
- edwarnicke presents slides that explain
COB (dfarrell07,
14:29:03)
- GregElkinbard Makes the point that process
*isn't* working now, needs to devolve decision making down to
communities (edwarnicke,
14:40:54)
- dfarrell07 expresses agreement wit
GregElkinbard (edwarnicke,
14:41:04)
- Tom Nadaeu expresses agreement with
GregElkinbard (edwarnicke,
14:41:21)
- dfarrell07 thinks the key point is that by
letting market forces work at the bottom with the most informed
people we will get the best resource allocation (dfarrell07,
14:42:02)
- Note of clarification: GregElkinbard's point
was the non-(Community Oriented Process) isn't working (edwarnicke,
14:42:08)
- dfarrell07 thinks we need to re-write the
summary of COB to be more clear, given that I think the TAC itself
is just getting to a point we can clearly explain this (dfarrell07,
14:43:51)
- TAC votes to request the board invite the TSC
TAC reps to the Oct 17 board meeting to present their community
oriented budget needs (edwarnicke,
14:47:12)
- for reference, the fd.io deck is here:
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1yrPIHZizkOfMe88JCLt-t_yovzmKgZF8kqqsmNn4wkQ/edit#slide=id.p
(edwarnicke,
14:53:06)
- edwarnicke is more than happy to grant edit
rights to other TSC reps to this doc should they choose to build
their slides there as well (edwarnicke,
14:55:14)
- AGREED: TAC votes to
request the board invite the TSC TAC reps to the Oct 17 board
meeting to present their community oriented budget needs
(edwarnicke,
14:57:59)
- https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1yrPIHZizkOfMe88JCLt-t_yovzmKgZF8kqqsmNn4wkQ/edit#slide=id.p
<- FD.io COB slides (edwarnicke,
15:02:53)
Meeting ended at 15:18:35 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- dfarrell07 to clarify in induction document that we expect automated checks to be passing (so can even build HTML) and clear, dedicated-subject email constitute announcing doc to start review
- edwarnicke to clarify COB scope wording per timirnich and dfarrell07 feedback to not require co-location (ie OPNFV Plugfests)
Action items, by person
- dfarrell07
- dfarrell07 to clarify in induction document that we expect automated checks to be passing (so can even build HTML) and clear, dedicated-subject email constitute announcing doc to start review
- edwarnicke to clarify COB scope wording per timirnich and dfarrell07 feedback to not require co-location (ie OPNFV Plugfests)
- edwarnicke
- edwarnicke to clarify COB scope wording per timirnich and dfarrell07 feedback to not require co-location (ie OPNFV Plugfests)
- timirnich
- edwarnicke to clarify COB scope wording per timirnich and dfarrell07 feedback to not require co-location (ie OPNFV Plugfests)
People present (lines said)
- dfarrell07 (18)
- edwarnicke (11)
- collabot (6)
- CaseyLF (4)
- ttallgren (2)
- anders_ (1)
- timirnich (1)
- GregElkinbard (1)
- rossella_s (1)
- Xiaojun (1)
- kennypaul (0)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.