#lfn-meeting: tac
Meeting started by dfarrell07 at 15:00:52 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
-
- tac members please #info in (dfarrell07,
15:01:00)
- Daniel Farrell for ODL (dfarrell07,
15:01:05)
- Jason Hunt, IBM (JasonHunt,
15:02:04)
- vmbrasseur is proxy for rbias (vmbrasseur,
15:02:11)
- VMBrasseur, Juniper (vmbrasseur,
15:02:38)
- Manuel Buil, SUSE (proxy for Rossella)
(mbuil,
15:03:11)
- Rajesh Gadiyar Intel (vmbrasseur,
15:04:41)
- edwarnicke (edwarnicke,
15:04:58)
- Davide Cherubini, Vodafone (vmbrasseur,
15:05:06)
- Morgan Richomme Orange (vmbrasseur,
15:05:19)
- Bin Hu, OPNFV (bh526r,
15:05:51)
- Chaker Al-Hakim, ONAP (vmbrasseur,
15:05:55)
- vmbrasseur is copying in #infos from Zoom chat
for people not on IRC (dfarrell07,
15:06:19)
- Tapio Tallgren, Nokia (kennypaul,
15:06:46)
- Chaker Al-Hakim, ONAP (kennypaul,
15:07:11)
- tooling (dfarrell07, 15:07:18)
- Tapio Tallgren, Nokia (ttallgren,
15:07:24)
- ed suggests looking at some other tooling
options that might be cheaper and provide better dev
experience (dfarrell07,
15:07:45)
- https://github.com/lfnetworking/process/issues/1
(edwarnicke,
15:08:51)
- Infra kick off meeting tomorrow 8AM Pacific
time (vmbrasseur,
15:09:19)
- Tina Tsou, ARM (kennypaul,
15:09:29)
- Correction: Meeting is on Friday, not
tomorrow (vmbrasseur,
15:09:55)
- bh526r mentions that OPNFV is also looking at
tooling changes, will make sure to stay in sync with these
discussions (dfarrell07,
15:12:23)
- ed gives examples of CI tooling like packet.net
vs Jenkins (dfarrell07,
15:12:45)
- CaseyLF will send out email with invite to
infra meeting on friday (dfarrell07,
15:13:05)
- taking better minutes (dfarrell07, 15:13:17)
- CaseyLF points out that there are quite a few
people who don't take part in IRC backchannel, which makes meeting a
bit split (dfarrell07,
15:13:46)
- using IRC for minute taking is what we do now
FYI (dfarrell07,
15:14:01)
- Cristina Pauna (CristinaPauna,
15:14:05)
- ed suggests we look at what CNFC is doing and
copy that (dfarrell07,
15:14:45)
- dfarrell07 thinks they are mostly using GDocs,
live editing during meetings (dfarrell07,
15:14:57)
- gdocs isn't great for us because blocked in
China :( (dfarrell07,
15:15:08)
- https://wiki.lfnetworking.org/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=10552006&draftShareId=290c9969-162d-4837-a8cd-3dc057c23b81&src=shareui&src.shareui.timestamp=1548861287687
(kennypaul,
15:15:14)
- CaseyLF suggest confluence tool kinda like
GDocs, edwarnicke has some experience with it and doesn't
like (dfarrell07,
15:15:29)
- we would not have tooling for voting, like we
have here with meetbot (dfarrell07,
15:15:40)
- main problem is just getting people engaging
with IRC, as it seems to actually be best tool (dfarrell07,
15:16:23)
- dfarrell07 and vmbrasseur seem to think that it
might not be tooling, might be mostly people-problem (dfarrell07,
15:18:07)
- dfarrell07 thinks general strategy of
experimenting with "new idea A" to see if "silent group B" will move
to "new idea A" could work well here, and likely we will find that
"silent group B" will remain silent (dfarrell07,
15:18:50)
- vmbrasseur asks folks on call who are not using
IRC why they aren't (dfarrell07,
15:19:43)
- Chaker says for him it's that he's not familiar
w/IRC so falls back to what he knows (vmbrasseur,
15:19:50)
- first person just want super simple tool with
basically no learning curve (dfarrell07,
15:19:59)
- might be some internal networking restrictions
blocking IRC (which is very rough for contributing upstream
dfarrell07 thinks) (dfarrell07,
15:20:55)
- https://irccloud.com (vmbrasseur,
15:21:59)
- dfarrell07 thinks one #action for TAC might be
to work with companies to get their networks sorted out to play well
with IRC (dfarrell07,
15:22:00)
- https://opensource.com/article/16/6/irc-quickstart-guide
(vmbrasseur,
15:22:10)
- Casey suggesting trial run of Confluence
wiki (vmbrasseur,
15:22:25)
- dfarrell07 Suggests companies that can't access
IRC via VPN then it will also be a roadblock to contributing to open
source. TAC should work w/those companies to remove the roadblock on
their side. (vmbrasseur,
15:24:38)
- http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=%23lfn-meeting
(vmbrasseur,
15:26:04)
- vmbrasseur points out that web-based IRC
clients shouldn't have issues with VPN restrictions as they run over
HTTPS (dfarrell07,
15:26:26)
- lots of folks seem to be big fans of
irccloud (dfarrell07,
15:29:37)
- ACTION: CaseyLF to
start sending out direct link to web-based (webchat.freenode) IRC
client in each meeting invite (dfarrell07,
15:31:35)
- should we have a secretary? (dfarrell07,
15:32:40)
- ttallgren points out that for many past
meetings we had horrible minutes and we ended up with questions
about "what did we decide" with no clear answer (dfarrell07,
15:33:39)
- discussion about who would want to be
secretary, no one self nominates (dfarrell07,
15:37:26)
- discussion about if we need minutes, as in
write down what we are talking about, vs making sure votes/decisions
are doc'd (dfarrell07,
15:37:50)
- LF staff tracks all votes in a spreadsheet (I
think to make sure people's votes count, based on attendance)
(dfarrell07,
15:40:02)
- CaseyLF points out that just having more people
engaging on IRC will be a big help in making sure we have all the
ideas in discussion captured (dfarrell07,
15:41:16)
- kennypaul asks about how to search in minutes
logs, dfarrell07 says not a great way but he curls/greps
(dfarrell07,
15:42:59)
- kennypaul asks whether there's an easy way to
search IRC meeting logs. CaseyLF doesn't think so, dfarrell07 says
logs are always grep-able (vmbrasseur,
15:43:10)
- CaseyLF points out kennypaul has been
cut/pasting IRC logs into Confluence for easy searchability
(vmbrasseur,
15:44:22)
- ACTION: CaseyLF will
send out email for further discussion on secretary role (vmbrasseur,
15:44:48)
- tac chair (dfarrell07, 15:45:09)
- edwarnicke suggests we hold this topic until we
get feedback from Board regarding our latest recommendations
(dfarrell07,
15:45:51)
- zxiiro adds "meetings should be searchable on
Google too, admittedly requires some google knowledge. For example:
site:meetings.opendaylight.org odl ddf" (dfarrell07,
15:46:44)
- phrobb provides summary of discussion about tac
chair, our recommendation to board (dfarrell07,
15:47:23)
- mazin is current TAC rep to Board but isn't
even on the TAC anymore :( (dfarrell07,
15:48:00)
- CaseyLF asks if we should appoint a new
temporary TAC rep to Board (dfarrell07,
15:48:20)
- edwarnicke points out that if Board will
feedback to us quickly and resolve this, we can just go that route.
if will take a long time, might need temp rep (dfarrell07,
15:48:56)
- phrobb and ttallgren talk about some details of
Board's process, there is a strategy council work group addressing
our proposal, they have not reported to board and board has not
decided (dfarrell07,
15:50:20)
- edwarnicke suggests we hold on this decision
(new tmp tac rep?) until we get some answers from board (dfarrell07,
15:51:34)
- ttallgren suggests we do find a new tmp tac
rep, start that process, open nominations (dfarrell07,
15:52:41)
- VOTE: Voted on "Shall
the TAC kickoff the TAC Representative to the Board election
process to start ASAP?" Results are, +1: 1 (phrobb,
15:55:54)
- phrobb voted on behalf of Sebastien of
DT (phrobb,
15:57:49)
- my vore proxy for Wenjing Chui (kennypaul,
15:58:24)
- proxy for tnadeau (zxiiro,
15:59:34)
- Voted for (Chakar Al-Hakim) (CaseyLF,
15:59:49)
- VOTE: Voted on "Shall
the TAC open a call for nominations for a temporary TAC rep starting
ASAP?" Results are, 0: 1, +1: 11 (dfarrell07,
15:59:54)
- Quorum for meeting is 12.73 membersd
(kennypaul,
16:00:28)
- vote ?+1 from tnadeau (kennypaul,
16:01:23)
- vote +1 from Dhananjay Pavgi\ (kennypaul,
16:01:39)
Meeting ended at 16:02:34 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- CaseyLF to start sending out direct link to web-based (webchat.freenode) IRC client in each meeting invite
- CaseyLF will send out email for further discussion on secretary role
Action items, by person
- CaseyLF
- CaseyLF to start sending out direct link to web-based (webchat.freenode) IRC client in each meeting invite
- CaseyLF will send out email for further discussion on secretary role
People present (lines said)
- dfarrell07 (61)
- vmbrasseur (23)
- collabot` (18)
- kennypaul (17)
- zxiiro (10)
- ttallgren (10)
- phrobb (4)
- CaseyLF (4)
- JasonHunt (3)
- edwarnicke (3)
- bh526r (2)
- mbuil (2)
- davide_Vodafone (1)
- eraolro (1)
- CristinaPauna (1)
- frankbrockners (0)
- tykeal (0)
- pcarver (0)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.