13:15:35 #startmeeting TSC June 29, 2017 13:15:35 Meeting started Thu Jun 29 13:15:35 2017 UTC. The chair is kennypaul. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:15:35 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 13:15:35 The meeting name has been set to 'tsc_june_29__2017' 13:23:24 #chair CaseyODL 13:23:24 Current chairs: CaseyODL kennypaul 13:30:10 #info Chris Donley Huawei 13:30:22 #info Alla Goldner Amdocs 13:30:38 #info proxy Anatoly Andrianov, Nokia 13:31:26 #info Xinhui Li VMware 13:31:32 #info Amir Levy GigaSpaces 13:32:19 #info Jason Hunt, IBM 13:33:53 #info Lingli Deng, China Mobile 13:34:51 #info proxy Leigh Anne Rettinger, Intel 13:34:59 #info alex_vul_intel 13:35:39 #info Stephen Terrill, Ericsson 13:35:55 #chair gildaslanilis 13:35:55 Current chairs: CaseyODL gildaslanilis kennypaul 13:38:30 #info meeting minute approvals will be done via email 13:39:09 #topic security 13:39:12 #action kennypaul will send an email with a link to prior meeting minutes for voting approval from the TSC members. 13:41:03 #info Security Vulnerabilities team is still looking for experts with an Open-O background. 13:41:31 join 13:41:51 #info SteveT shared a CII proposal 13:42:53 #info 3 levels - Passing, Silver, Gold 13:45:22 #action SteveT will resend the proposal 13:46:03 #info vote will be be next Thursday 13:51:42 #topic SDO update in email 13:52:04 #topic Arch Committee 13:52:51 #info Chris Donley electd chair 13:53:06 #topic integration 13:53:40 #info helen OOO 13:53:42 #info Huabing Zhao, ZTE on behalf of Zhaoxing 13:53:52 #topic Modeling 13:54:46 #info modeling update in email 13:55:31 #topic infrasture 13:55:44 # repos being built 13:56:00 yes, both SDO update and modeling update are included in a single email. 13:57:04 #info repos being built, 12 remaining 13:57:14 Hi all - who from LF can help me creating a weekly meeting with ZOOM etc for OOM? thanks, 13:59:00 #info Kenny creating/moving/rescheduling meeitngs 13:59:45 #info if meetings are bering rescheduled be aware that license contention can be an issue 14:00:34 #info If recording is needed a lastpass account is required and must be saved locally. 14:01:45 #info ensure that you use end all 14:01:57 #topic release naming 14:02:22 #info Amsterdam and Beijing 1 & 2 14:04:32 #topic July Virtual Meeting 14:06:36 #decision on times TBD 14:06:48 #undo 14:06:48 Removing item from minutes: 14:07:08 #info decisions on time TBD 14:07:41 #topic Sept 24th meeting 14:07:59 #undo 14:07:59 Removing item from minutes: 14:10:16 #info July 24/25 target is 4 hours per day - may also be the 26th 14:11:54 #action kennypaul create poll for 3x 4 hour slots. 14:12:14 so Chris looked at this for the architecture meeting... I think the only time slot that isn't midnight-6 is 9am-noon ET. 14:12:45 #info vote open to all commmunity 14:13:07 #topic sept mtg 14:13:36 #info reviewing proposal from Nokia 14:14:16 #info week of Sept 24 14:15:05 #topic Release Review 14:16:01 #info reviews tomorrow and July 7th, TSC attendance requested. 14:16:54 #info focus- commitments, timeline, dependencies, resources 14:18:12 #topic Application Authentication Framework 14:18:34 #link https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Amsterdam+Release+Planning%3A+M1+Project+Review <--Calendar for M1 Release Planning 14:19:04 #link https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=3247151 14:19:55 Criteria for M1 Release Planning: 1) Commitment to the R1 (Amsterdam) Release, 2) Timeline, 3) Dependecies, 4) Resources (commiters, contributors). 14:20:23 and any potential risk that the TSC should be aware of. 14:21:01 who 14:25:42 #info Q multi-tenancy handling 14:26:37 #undo 14:26:37 Removing item from minutes: 14:28:13 #info reviewed Q posted to the wiki-page 14:29:30 #info Parviz Yegani 14:30:42 could you be more precise on the ONAP components will in the scope of the project ? 14:37:27 will write on IRC 14:37:44 Guys we have limited time, and we have to go tthrough 3 projects more 14:40:54 #startvote Does the TSC approve the Application Authorization Framework as an incubation project within ONAP? 14:40:54 Begin voting on: Does the TSC approve the Application Authorization Framework as an incubation project within ONAP? Valid vote options are Yes, No. 14:40:54 Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 14:41:00 #vote +1 14:41:02 #vote +1 14:41:16 #endvote 14:41:16 Voted on "Does the TSC approve the Application Authorization Framework as an incubation project within ONAP?" Results are 14:41:35 #startvote Does the TSC approve the Application Authorization Framework as an incubation project within ONAP? +1,0,-1 14:41:35 Begin voting on: Does the TSC approve the Application Authorization Framework as an incubation project within ONAP? Valid vote options are +1, 0, -1. 14:41:35 Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 14:41:39 #vote +1 14:41:42 #vote +1 14:41:43 #vote +1 14:41:43 #vote +1 14:41:44 #vote +1 14:41:44 #vote +1 14:41:45 #vote `1 14:41:45 SteveT: `1 is not a valid option. Valid options are +1, 0, -1. 14:41:46 #vote +1 14:41:48 #vote +1 14:41:49 #vote +1 14:41:50 +1 14:41:53 #vote +1 14:41:53 #vote +1 14:41:58 #vote +1 14:42:07 #vote +1 14:42:29 #endvote 14:42:29 Voted on "Does the TSC approve the Application Authorization Framework as an incubation project within ONAP?" Results are 14:42:29 +1 (13): Jamil, alla, Leigh, amir_levy, JasonHunt, ning_, SteveT, Huabing, cdonley, Dsauvageau, Xiaojun, gilbert, Lingli_Deng 14:43:00 #agree The TSC has approved the Application Authorization Framework as an incubation project within ONAP. 14:43:11 #action follow ups required 14:43:48 #topic External System Register 14:44:07 #link https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=5734948 14:49:18 #info concerns that questions from Beijing meeting have not been answered 14:52:49 #action lizi to set up meeting with impacted PTL wed. 14:53:19 #info deferring vote 14:53:30 #topic Reference VNFs 14:54:45 #info this is a sub project of integration 14:55:08 #info no vote needed 14:55:26 #topic Logging Enhancements 15:03:39 #info need additional committers on the proposal. 15:04:34 Bell will add committers to the logging project 15:04:50 #startvote Does the TSC approve Logging Enhancements as an incubation project within ONAP with the contingency that additional committers are added? Respond with +1, 0 -1 15:04:50 Begin voting on: Does the TSC approve Logging Enhancements as an incubation project within ONAP with the contingency that additional committers are added? Valid vote options are Respond, with, +1, 0, -1. 15:04:50 Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 15:05:14 with at least 3 companies 15:05:25 #vote +1 15:05:29 #vote +1 15:05:30 #vote +1 15:05:30 #vote +1 15:05:32 #vote +1 15:05:33 #vote +1 15:05:33 #vote +1 15:05:33 +1 15:05:34 #vote +1 15:05:36 #vote +1 15:05:37 #vote +1 15:05:41 #vote +1 15:05:47 #vote +1 15:05:54 #vote +1 15:06:07 #endvote 15:06:07 Voted on "Does the TSC approve Logging Enhancements as an incubation project within ONAP with the contingency that additional committers are added?" Results are 15:06:07 +1 (13): Jamil, Anatoly_, alla, Leigh, amir_levy, JasonHunt, SteveT, Huabing, cdonley, Dsauvageau, Xiaojun, gilbert, Lingli_Deng 15:06:29 #agree TSC approves Logging Enhancements as an incubation project within ONAP with the contingency that additional committers are added 15:06:48 #endmeeting