#onap-meeting: TSC 2017-12-21

Meeting started by kennypaul at 13:48:54 UTC (full logs).

Meeting summary

  1. rollcall (kennypaul, 13:49:23)
    1. mazin gilbert (AT&T) (gilbert, 14:00:26)
    2. jamil from Orange (jamil, 14:00:53)
    3. Amir Lvy (Cloudify) (amir_levy, 14:00:57)
    4. Amir Levy (Cloudify) (amir_levy, 14:01:01)
    5. nagaraja sr infosys (nagu, 14:01:03)
    6. Stephen Terrill (SteveT, 14:01:12)
    7. Stephen Terrill, Ericsson (SteveT, 14:01:24)
    8. Alla Goldner, AMDOCS (kennypaul, 14:02:27)
    9. Jason Hunt, IBM (JasonHunt, 14:03:30)
    10. Zhaoxing Meng, ZTE (Zhaoxing, 14:03:35)

  2. agenda updates (kennypaul, 14:05:37)
    1. sec-subcom update (kennypaul, 14:05:57)
    2. governance - committee updates (kennypaul, 14:06:21)
    3. cii badging (kennypaul, 14:06:50)
    4. governance regarding sub-projects. Do they submit project/Beijing release plans for TSC review, etc (phrobb, 14:07:08)

  3. Beijing and Amsterdam maintenance status (kennypaul, 14:07:41)
    1. container based network service is a project (kennypaul, 14:10:07)
    2. discussion about Arch Sub guidance on where proposal fits (project/ sub-project/ subcommittee) (kennypaul, 14:11:31)
    3. concerns over bottlenecks (kennypaul, 14:12:18)
    4. need clarity over what we are asking the Arch-Sub to provide (kennypaul, 14:14:43)
    5. SteveT email was sent regarding project scope (kennypaul, 14:15:58)
    6. whoever brought the project forward needs tp provide the final project resolution (kennypaul, 14:17:28)
    7. image manager: needs Arch Sub review and come back by M1 (kennypaul, 14:20:55)
    8. all projects must be ready for TSC approval by M1 or before. (kennypaul, 14:21:29)
    9. the approach the TSC should pursue going forward will be towards the consolidation of projects versus the propagation of projects. (kennypaul, 14:25:17)
    10. Dhananjay Pavgi, Tech Mahindra (kennypaul, 14:26:08)
    11. image manager was discussed in the Arch Sub this week (kennypaul, 14:27:36)
    12. if adding a function does not change the scope of a project no TSC approval is needed - only needs approval of the PTL. (kennypaul, 14:29:33)
    13. may need to be reviewed if a project was not originally an umbrella project (kennypaul, 14:31:15)

  4. runtime catalog proposal (kennypaul, 14:32:08)
    1. being discussed with SDC. (kennypaul, 14:33:10)
    2. the question for the "Run Time Catalog" proposal from the Arch. committee is "does the functionality proposed belong in the SDC project instead of a separate project?" That discussion is ongoing with the SDC project (phrobb, 14:33:24)

  5. certificate and secret mgmt (kennypaul, 14:34:04)
    1. reviewed by Arch-Sub - could be an AAF function. (kennypaul, 14:34:39)

  6. ONAP Benhmark (kennypaul, 14:36:23)
    1. to be under integration project - project scope may need to be reviewed. (kennypaul, 14:36:59)

  7. Open Source Access Mgmt (kennypaul, 14:37:14)
    1. reviewed by Arch-Sub - needs to be re-reviewed. (kennypaul, 14:38:36)
    2. need to enforce that proposed projects be run through Usecase-Sub first then through Arch-Sub (kennypaul, 14:40:22)
    3. The open source access management is related to the use of open hardware in onap (kennypaul, 14:42:49)
    4. Discussion on process - need to make a higherlevel checklist available on project proposal. (kennypaul, 14:44:26)

  8. Distributed KV store (kennypaul, 14:44:53)
  9. CHAP (kennypaul, 14:45:37)
    1. being discusses w/ OOM after first of year (kennypaul, 14:46:03)
    2. Discussion over usecases (kennypaul, 14:51:25)
    3. pasting links from zoom chat (kennypaul, 14:54:03)
    4. https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Project+Proposal+Template (kennypaul, 14:54:31)
    5. https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Beijing+Functional+Requirements+for+TSC+Approval (kennypaul, 14:55:09)
    6. https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=15998867 (kennypaul, 14:55:27)
    7. different from the older "carrrier grade requirments" - our list of EPICs? (kennypaul, 14:56:07)
    8. https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Merged+list+of+R2+functional+requirement+candidates (kennypaul, 14:56:19)
    9. concerns raised over the amount of work and time to do it. (kennypaul, 14:57:33)

  10. TSC approvals from F2F (kennypaul, 14:58:27)
    1. Gildas reviewed slide (kennypaul, 14:59:01)
    2. Susana Sabater, Vodafone (kennypaul, 14:59:46)
    3. discussion over HEAT template in Beijing. (kennypaul, 15:00:35)
    4. Dhananjay Pavgi, Tech Mahindra (DhananjayPavgi, 15:00:59)
    5. need to ensure that DCAE is engaged throughout (kennypaul, 15:05:11)
    6. API stability covered in platform maturity page (kennypaul, 15:06:05)
    7. https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=15998867 (kennypaul, 15:06:17)
    8. discussion of upgrade operations (kennypaul, 15:08:28)
    9. conversation of Amsterdam to Beijing upgrade path to be reviewed by TSC (kennypaul, 15:12:04)
    10. may need a coordinator for upgrade operations across projects. (kennypaul, 15:12:53)
    11. creation of a workgroup to decide requirements in general (kennypaul, 15:14:22)
    12. bug status was reviewed (kennypaul, 15:16:35)
    13. need for use of version field in JIRA ws emphasized. (kennypaul, 15:17:12)
    14. concerns over repos lacking an Amsterdam branch. (kennypaul, 15:18:46)

  11. Sec-Sub update (kennypaul, 15:19:52)
    1. code code scanning reports need to go to PTLS (kennypaul, 15:20:29)
    2. please refer to Steve's email. (kennypaul, 15:21:28)

  12. governance (kennypaul, 15:22:20)
    1. inviting some SOs to be part of modeling -sub (kennypaul, 15:22:58)
    2. would like to bring back monthly sub committee updates in the TSC meeting (kennypaul, 15:24:38)
    3. recommendation for rolling updates (kennypaul, 15:26:25)
    4. will set regular cadence of sub-c updares (kennypaul, 15:28:01)

  13. CII Badging (kennypaul, 15:28:15)
    1. how are sub-projects to be handled (kennypaul, 15:29:42)
    2. Sec-sub to provide guidelines/checklist for projects to follow (kennypaul, 15:31:22)


Meeting ended at 16:51:39 UTC (full logs).

Action items

  1. (none)


People present (lines said)

  1. kennypaul (77)
  2. collabot (7)
  3. jamil (3)
  4. nagu (2)
  5. phrobb (2)
  6. amir_levy (2)
  7. SteveT (2)
  8. tykeal (1)
  9. JasonHunt (1)
  10. DhananjayPavgi (1)
  11. gilbert (1)
  12. Zhaoxing (1)


Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.