============================= #onap-meeting: tsc-2018-03-29 ============================= Meeting started by kennypaul at 14:08:18 UTC. The full logs are available at http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/onap-meeting/2018/onap-meeting.2018-03-29-14.08.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * Stephen Terrill, Ericsson (SteveT, 14:09:05) * TSC members please #info in (phrobb, 14:09:07) * Frank Brockners (frankbrockners, 14:09:17) * Huabing Zhao on behalf of Zhaoxing Meng, ZTE (Huabing_Zhao, 14:09:42) * Ranny Haiby, Nokia (RannyHaiby, 14:10:08) * Casablanaca theme (SteveT, 14:13:57) * Casablanca architecture and requirements (phrobb, 14:14:00) * proposed theme is deployability (SteveT, 14:14:41) * topics - technical debt, modularity, 5G fundamentals (SteveT, 14:15:22) * modularity, standards alignment, micro services, vnf/pnf, s3p, containers, external controllers (SteveT, 14:16:48) * standards alignment (SteveT, 14:17:14) * there was a question about vfc, appc, so, is that addressed. The answer is that It’s in the modularity and microservices (SteveT, 14:18:34) * the above is food for thought from UC and Architecture (SteveT, 14:19:19) * Xinhui Li, VMware (xinhuili, 14:21:05) * proxy Marc-Alexandre Choquette, Bell Canada (ma_c, 14:21:18) * there was a comment that its more than modularity, but also optional it’s (SteveT, 14:21:39) * There was comments about the usability (SteveT, 14:26:25) * that the usability has to improve. The learning curve is too high. This is both technical and documentation (SteveT, 14:27:29) * it was raised edge cloud computing, which is necessary for 5G, and osm (SteveT, 14:28:22) * It was commented that the operators need to drive (SteveT, 14:29:40) * It is proposed that we have an end-user advisory committee. (SteveT, 14:30:30) * the proposed staffing of the end-user advisory committee is the likes of product managers that own/deploy onap (SteveT, 14:31:43) * proposed knowledge sharing (SteveT, 14:33:57) * weekly webinars requested from members (kennypaul, 14:34:01) * it was informed by phill that there is a LFN wide end-user advisory committee, that has workgroups. This would fit into a workgroup under that (SteveT, 14:35:03) * one question raised is what is the right state for what components (SteveT, 14:36:30) * proposal to get a onap focus end-user group, that could be considered a workgroup under LFN end-user. It should be operator focused, but vendor still not excluded (SteveT, 14:43:26) * proposed to do this under the LFN structure. The members need to sign a form saying they know they are speaking in public, etc. Phil can initiate this. Mazin said within a week he can get a number of operators to join this (SteveT, 14:49:33) * On the topic of webinars. The education committee is going to lead. Looking for the entire community. Suggested weekly. (SteveT, 14:53:16) * request for clarify of the milestone details at M1 (SteveT, 15:03:42) * Casablanca planning (SteveT, 15:04:36) * LINK: https://wiki.onap.org/plugins/servlet/mobile?contentId=3246393#content/view/3246393 (SteveT, 15:05:34) * Gildas presented the draft time plan (SteveT, 15:06:23) * proposed time line M0 5/25, M1 6/28, m2 7/26, M3 8/30, M4 9/20, release 11/15 (kennypaul, 15:07:06) * new projects before the Beijing meeting (SteveT, 15:07:58) * this is already sent out. 1 week to socialize this, approval is on the next Thursday meeting (SteveT, 15:08:40) * ACTION: kenny add sched approval to next week's agebda (kennypaul, 15:09:44) * M4 review (kennypaul, 15:09:59) * gildas shared his slide deck (kennypaul, 15:10:49) * items covered FOSS, Vulnerability template (kennypaul, 15:12:19) * findings are to be shared ayt next week's meeintg (kennypaul, 15:12:46) * item covered CII badging , code coverage, pending commits, csit failures (kennypaul, 15:14:28) * portal updates required regarding music. (kennypaul, 15:18:50) * cli -no ptl (kennypaul, 15:19:37) * , portal cli, holmes, msb, music.vid. integration, doc passed (kennypaul, 15:21:08) * clamp integration ongoing (kennypaul, 15:21:53) * vnfrqts no ptl (kennypaul, 15:22:35) * aai - integration with aaf garphadm=in not done pass otherwise. (kennypaul, 15:23:15) * policy stretch goal targetred for RC0 pass otherwise (kennypaul, 15:24:19) * oom some stories will bw completed during integration. CLM visibility -gildas will follow up. (kennypaul, 15:25:19) * some projects haven’t done their conversion to help for OOM, this needs to be done quickly. Message-router is expected ina couple of days. (SteveT, 15:30:23) * integration priority message-router , dcae, sdnc, nmultivim, vfc (kennypaul, 15:32:23) * OOF function development is undergoing (xinhuili, 15:34:54) * multicloud - azsure postponed to future relase (kennypaul, 15:35:12) * vfc (kennypaul, 15:35:30) * risk etsi nfv compliance will take conversation offline (kennypaul, 15:36:16) * oof a couple csit failures but pass otherwise (kennypaul, 15:36:52) * appc ode coverage 48.7 %, (kennypaul, 15:37:20) * mariadb descoped (kennypaul, 15:37:33) * sdc short of code coverage, (kennypaul, 15:39:17) * vnfsdk short on some code coverage, LFIT tickets to address some issues. (kennypaul, 15:39:53) * code was merged at 8:09 this morning (kennypaul, 15:40:17) * itools and dovetail done (kennypaul, 15:42:45) * code coverage passed at 3am this morning (kennypaul, 15:43:42) * ccsdk/storage/pgaas repo is not used in Beijing. Code has been removed and sonar data has been updated (djtimoney, 15:43:49) * ccsdk (kennypaul, 15:44:04) * mariadb descoped (kennypaul, 15:44:41) * sdnc code coverage (kennypaul, 15:45:10) * code came in to late and will be cut (kennypaul, 15:45:42) * logging only python delivered in beijing (kennypaul, 15:46:54) * Issues with sonar running python - LF looking into it
need to up the version on oparent to fix one of the builds
the docker build fails because we have no required docker yet
logging java stub - I will add tests on the weekend - there is no API yet - slated for Cassablanca
python library from multicloud team - thanks - either they or myself will add tests
vulnerability is standard elk ports (kennypaul, 15:48:17) * modeling code coverage short, requestoign2 extra weeks to complete code coverage for java parser (kennypaul, 15:49:17) * usecase ui no templates vulnerabilituy, cii, clm, code coverage short (kennypaul, 15:50:59) * externalapi no templates vulnerabiliuty, cii, code coverage 0 (kennypaul, 15:52:29) * eric says coverage will be provided my RC0 - does not pass M4 (kennypaul, 15:55:12) * dmaap no vulnerability, 2 gpl licenses, gpl to be addresses by RC0 (kennypaul, 15:56:35) * does not pass M4 (kennypaul, 15:56:54) * aaf vi=vulnerabilit y tmeplate not done, code coverage not met, very late code contributions, fails csit (kennypaul, 15:58:27) * aaf subproject ok, (kennypaul, 15:58:42) * from randa APPC has dependency on AAF for feature AAF-91 (kennypaul, 15:59:08) * catherise want this aaf to be escalated (kennypaul, 16:00:10) * does not pass M4 and is a critica issue (kennypaul, 16:00:27) * vvp no foss, no code coverage, does not pass M4 (kennypaul, 16:02:21) * usecase ui did not pass m4 (kennypaul, 16:03:16) * appc request extra to complete aaf integration. (kennypaul, 16:05:43) Meeting ended at 18:49:43 UTC. People present (lines said) --------------------------- * kennypaul (59) * SteveT (28) * collabot (7) * phrobb (4) * xinhuili (3) * ma_c (1) * frankbrockners (1) * Huabing_Zhao (1) * djtimoney (1) * RannyHaiby (1) * phrpobb (0) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4