18:00:26 #startmeeting 2015-12-16 discussion 18:00:26 Meeting started Wed Dec 16 18:00:26 2015 UTC. The chair is wking. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 18:00:26 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 18:00:26 The meeting name has been set to '2015_12_16_discussion' 18:01:21 #chair vbatts|mobile vbatts RobDolinMS mrunalp crosbymichael 18:01:21 Warning: Nick not in channel: RobDolinMS 18:01:21 Warning: Nick not in channel: mrunalp 18:01:21 Current chairs: RobDolinMS crosbymichael mrunalp vbatts vbatts|mobile wking 18:02:03 I'm guest :) 18:03:24 #topic 0.2.0 pull requests 18:03:32 #url https://github.com/opencontainers/specs/milestones/v0.2.0 18:03:55 vishh just updated https://github.com/opencontainers/specs/pull/233 18:04:19 b684645 -> 9173eb8 18:04:28 mrunalp still sees some strings 18:04:50 discussion to continue on #233 18:05:03 wking: are you sitting on a fireplace? 18:05:09 yup 18:05:16 funny 18:05:35 but warm :) 18:05:47 #topic face-to-face meeting 18:05:57 #action duglin to mail the list with ideas/times 18:06:44 #chair mrunalp 18:06:44 Current chairs: RobDolinMS crosbymichael mrunalp vbatts vbatts|mobile wking 18:06:56 #topic focus for the next milestone 18:07:35 mrunalp: Can we separate create and start? 18:07:44 vishh: Death of the container process and state cleanup? 18:08:02 vishh: What are we doing about the container ID? 18:08:31 Mrunal: We agree we need some sort of ID 18:08:34 #url https://groups.google.com/a/opencontainers.org/forum/#!topic/dev/q6TYqVZOcX8 18:08:51 Trevor: Is this a new issue or email thread? 18:08:58 Mrunal: this is related but not exactly the same 18:09:19 Mrunal: we can target nailing this down for 0.3 18:09:31 #action vishh to open an issue with thoughts on container ID 18:09:58 Mrunal: I can open an issue on the separation of start steps 18:10:01 RobDolinMS: it's from November 25th, so not that new 18:10:02 ... and another for the clean-up 18:10:27 (WKing: good point) 18:10:43 #topic punt on protobuf 18:11:08 mrunalp: maybe use per-platform directories so we can compile cross-platform parsers for now 18:11:51 #url https://github.com/opencontainers/specs/pull/185 18:12:06 ^ that's protobuf 18:12:45 https://github.com/opencontainers/specs/pull/135 18:12:55 #url https://github.com/opencontainers/specs/pull/135 18:13:04 ^ problem that protobuf was trying to solve 18:13:13 #topic handling users 18:13:25 https://github.com/opencontainers/specs/pull/191 18:13:28 #url https://github.com/opencontainers/specs/pull/191 18:14:49 #topic back to cross-platform JSON parsing in Go 18:14:58 duglin: wondering what the issue is for #135 18:15:21 mrunalp and wking trying to explain the platform-specific Go type compilation 18:15:47 duglin: we want platform-independent stuff, so we don't want spec-parsing config that's compilation-platform dependent 18:16:03 wking: I think we all agree with that^ 18:16:29 mrunalp's suggestion fixes that, and protobuf would have fixed it (but protobuf landing may not happen, and is far out in any case) 18:17:43 mrunalp: hoping all of these topics end up in 0.3.0 by late January 18:18:03 #topic cgroup parent config (like Docker) 18:18:24 Or systemd? 18:18:47 vishh thinks parents aren't worth the trouble, just use cgroupsPath 18:19:01 vishh: the less we have to do around cgroups, the better 18:19:25 mrunalp: this is somehow tied up with systemd [wking: although I don't understand that point] 18:20:41 mrunalp: should we require cgroupsPath to always start with a forward slash? 18:21:20 vishh: or just require it to be relative to cgroups mount point, regardless of leading slash 18:21:35 #action vishh to open a PR with his approach 18:22:02 mrunalp: anything else for 0.3.0? 18:22:23 #topic defining a tar format 18:22:27 liangchenye: we might want this^ 18:22:42 mrunalp: don't we already define the tar format by defining the bundle filesystem layout? 18:23:06 duglin: has been working with philips on this 18:23:30 duglin: hopefully will get the proposal out within a week or so 18:24:14 #topic 0.3.0 procedure 18:24:33 #action mrunalp open a 0.3.0 milestone listing these topics with a soft deadline 18:24:45 #topic Next meeting 18:24:53 #agreed Cancel next two weeks 18:24:53 with year-end, next meeting to happen on 2016-01-06 18:25:04 #action mrunalp to mail the list about that^ 18:25:12 #agreed next meeting on Wed, 06 Jan, 2016 18:25:26 #topic Validation of multiple implementations 18:26:07 Vishnu: We should have multiple interoperable implementations 18:26:09 mrunalp: ocitools and OCT will help testing multiple implemenations 18:26:26 Need for annotations. 18:26:31 (wking just typed what I was starting to type :) ) 18:26:46 vishh: wants multiple implementations (not just runC) to test generality 18:27:02 mrunalp: wants other stakeholders to get involved (so they should review opencontainers/specs) 18:27:39 And can we have a platform dependent strict for handling things like uid/gid user strict. 18:27:45 jlb13: not sure what the BSD folks want, they seem more interested in Docker + jails 18:28:07 jlb13: have a runC running on Solaris with zones, looking into porting libcontainer now 18:28:28 Nice 18:30:19 can’t find my window to unmute!!! 18:30:27 RobDolinMS: duglin will you coordinate OCI LF meeting? 18:30:31 duglin: haha :D 18:30:40 which meeting? 18:31:07 RobDolinMS: your f2f meeting, and a LF company rep meeting to elect a trademark chair 18:31:21 duglin: what dates did they propose? 18:31:35 RobDolinMS: no dates yet, maybe by Friday or by next week 18:31:58 duglin: will try to align, but may not want to wait for them 18:32:18 RobDolinMS: wants this to be not a weekend 18:33:13 back 18:33:14 jlb13: Oracle isn't getting these communications, please include us ;) 18:33:33 * Oracle may be getting them, but jlb13 isn't ;) 18:33:54 #action RobDolinMS to link jlb13 in on who at Oracle is getting them 18:34:29 RobDolinMS: this is all about oci-formation or some other lawyer-ish list 18:34:59 we need to take off the full month for the superbowl? :-) 18:35:14 #endmeeting