========================================
#opendaylight-group-policy: ODL-GBP-ARCH
========================================


Meeting started by dconde at 18:06:48 UTC.  The full logs are available
at
http://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-group-policy/2014/odl_gbp_arch/opendaylight-group-policy-odl_gbp_arch.2014-05-23-18.06.log.html
.



Meeting summary
---------------

* readams says that we don’t need to be so thorough on meeting minutes
  (tbachman, 18:07:06)
* LINK:
  https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/calendar/ZHZvcmtpbkBub2lyb25ldHdvcmtzLmNvbQ.bps9id27mhd0pnqqljgjkckoqk?authuser=1
  (readams, 18:07:59)
* tenant is important under policy  (dconde, 18:10:46)
* we don't need to virtual ODL instances.  (dconde, 18:14:00)
* AGREED: we will not subvirtualize JVM or virtualize controller
  (dconde, 18:15:39)
* lenrow wants opp to put a proposal for tenants  (dconde, 18:18:18)
* do we want another layer of containment?  (dconde, 18:20:07)
* rather than tenant/  (dconde, 18:20:13)
* IDEA: we are talknig of sub-tenants  (dconde, 18:21:13)
* readsms says at BigSwitch they defined stuff in terms of flow-space.
  That did not work, although it was a requirement.  (dconde, 18:22:50)
* it worked fine :-)  (readams, 18:23:03)
* the answer is blue  (tbachman, 18:23:45)
* ACTION: lenrow and other will run it by GBP  (dconde, 18:24:01)
* NB  (dconde, 18:24:56)
  * nothing to be said on that. well discussed a few weeks ago.
    (dconde, 18:25:23)
  * scalability constrained by fact of using servlets.  (dconde,
    18:29:52)
  * readams says they do a read on a URL and a write to a websockets,
    hence that's the limitation.  (dconde, 18:30:46)
  * IDEA: XMPP ? is that an option?  (dconde, 18:31:05)
  * no that's how you'd implement notifications over HTTP; this is not
    implemented in restconf so far as I know  (readams, 18:31:12)
  * uchau question: is there a sequence diagram?  (dconde, 18:33:53)
  * readams says the cloest we have is a picture in front page of
    architecture.  (dconde, 18:34:11)
  * dvorkini_ says we do need that.  (dconde, 18:34:43)
  * dvorkini_ says different renderers have different semantics.
    NETCONF, OpenFlow, etc.  (dconde, 18:35:34)
  * uchau asks what determines the renderer?  (dconde, 18:35:58)
  * dvorkinista says rendering down to substrate needs be done in a
    framework that can accomodate different deliverables.  (dconde,
    18:36:49)
  * ovsdb using openflow renderer will do things differently from other
    methods.  (dconde, 18:38:31)
  * Had to drop due to competing situation. Apologies  (lenrow,
    18:40:58)
  * readams a simple renderer can render down to CLI for just using
    ACLs.  (dconde, 18:41:39)



Meeting ended at 18:41:44 UTC.



Action items, by person
-----------------------

* lenrow
  * lenrow and other will run it by GBP



People present (lines said)
---------------------------

* dconde (29)
* readams (6)
* odl_meetbot (5)
* tbachman (3)
* s3wong (3)
* alagalah (2)
* lenrow (1)



Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4