#opendaylight-group-policy: ODL-GBP-MODEL

Meeting started by dconde at 17:10:56 UTC (full logs).

Meeting summary

    1. readams multiple contexts per broadcast domain (dconde, 17:11:38)
    2. every domain has a subset associated with it? (dconde, 17:13:29)
    3. mickey asking whether we are separating various constructs (dconde, 17:19:09)
    4. FD vs BD -- flooding domain or a forwarding domain? (dconde, 17:20:10)
    5. we were gettng confused (dconde, 17:20:18)
    6. BD = Bridge FD = Flood domain (dconde, 17:20:46)
    7. multiple FD per BD is OK (dconde, 17:21:19)
    8. we were confused with terms. now it's all clearer (dconde, 17:22:27)
    9. subnets can be part of these constructs. (dconde, 17:22:38)
    10. subnet masks to BD, FD in 1:1 (dconde, 17:22:54)
    11. can we make it orthogonal? (dconde, 17:23:13)
    12. we can make it with NO L2 domain (dconde, 17:23:35)
    13. all L3 is possible. (dconde, 17:23:53)
    14. if we have bridge but not flood domain, then what? (dconde, 17:24:45)
    15. is it 1:1? (dconde, 17:24:50)
    16. then we don't want to require specifying both. (dconde, 17:25:02)
    17. two cases. Only L3 is one case. no BD (dconde, 17:25:47)
    18. just like Amazon (dconde, 17:26:05)
    19. then do we have two case? Multiple subnets? (dconde, 17:26:22)
    20. EPG belongs to a subnet. (dconde, 17:26:31)
    21. L3 context gives a namespace. (dconde, 17:26:57)
    22. with no gateway, you cannot talk to outside without NAT'ing. (dconde, 17:27:45)
    23. like a classic overlay case. (dconde, 17:27:51)
    24. if you have two name spaces? (dconde, 17:29:00)
    25. what is a L3 domain -- then it's just a set of IP addresses? (dconde, 17:31:07)
    26. some customers can achieve security without creating a sandbox. (dconde, 17:32:36)
    27. what do we want -- context vs. isolation. these are independent attirbutes (dconde, 17:34:04)
    28. everyone who has done this sort of thing has defined a similar construct (dconde, 17:34:29)
    29. L3 context has several Bridge domains, and we assume there is BD, do we want an automatic FD. (dconde, 17:35:31)
    30. we talked about whether rendering can do "best job" and still fulfill, vs. unable to do (dconde, 17:51:52)
    31. like running compiler and looking at machine code (it's idiosyncratic output, but still will work) (dconde, 17:52:36)
    32. priorities of static vs dynamic contract - sanjay -- he will upload PDF of the PPT (dconde, 17:53:47)


Meeting ended at 17:55:45 UTC (full logs).

Action items

  1. (none)


People present (lines said)

  1. dconde (35)
  2. odl_meetbot (4)
  3. tbachman (2)
  4. regXboi (1)
  5. alagalah (0)


Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.