17:00:03 <tbachman> #startmeeting gbp_status_arch
17:00:03 <odl_meetbot> Meeting started Fri Mar 13 17:00:03 2015 UTC.  The chair is tbachman. Information about MeetBot at http://ci.openstack.org/meetbot.html.
17:00:03 <odl_meetbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
17:00:03 <odl_meetbot> The meeting name has been set to 'gbp_status_arch'
17:00:06 <tbachman> #chair alagalah
17:00:06 <odl_meetbot> Current chairs: alagalah tbachman
17:00:12 <tbachman> #topic agenda
17:01:16 <tbachman> #link https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-group-policy/2015/gbp_status_arch/opendaylight-group-policy-gbp_status_arch.2015-02-27-18.02.html Minutes from last week’s meeting
17:03:32 <tbachman> #topic Trello
17:10:51 <tbachman> #info alagalah, martin_sunal, and others have been working on the neutron provider
17:11:02 <tbachman> #info Worked out a lot of the mappings, but still some more work to be done
17:11:53 <tbachman> #info yapeng moved the port name from openstack-endpoint renderer to the generic endpoint; moved the URI in openstack, and changed the port name
17:12:10 <tbachman> #info yapeng says the code has been merged to the master branch, for kilo, and will be back-ported to the Juno branch
17:12:32 <tbachman> #info yapeng says both openstack-gbp and regular gpb were validated against yapeng’s work
17:12:55 <tbachman> #info Sanjay asks if the augmentation for the port has been added to the northbound
17:13:03 <tbachman> #info alagalah says he’ll address that in a minute
17:13:28 <tbachman> #info yapeng says from the openstack side, the change has been completed and merged — hoping to be completed/approved by the end fo the day
17:14:31 <tbachman> #info alagalah says that having this back-ported to Juno will allow us to remove the old openstack-gbp code from ODL
17:14:44 <tbachman> yapeng: great job! :)
17:15:55 <tbachman> #info alagalah says that we’re still in the same state with port-name — we didn’t want to break what yapeng was working on; alagalah saw the patch to change the port name and will try to look at it over the weekend
17:17:17 <tbachman> #info alagalah has added support for EPs being in multiple EPGs, but there are lots of implications; control plane part is done, data plane still being worked on
17:17:52 <tbachman> #info alagalah says when an EP was only part of a single EPG, network containment was simple — defined by EPG; with multi-EPG, this is defined by the EP.
17:29:38 <tbachman> #info Sanjays asks about moving network location from Endpoint
17:31:14 <tbachman> #info alagalah says the EPG’s NetworkDomainID is more generic — the EP has an L2 and L3 context
17:51:07 <tbachman> #info alagalah introduces the architecture proposed for multi-EPG support
17:51:40 <tbachman> #info alagalah says that the EP will be able to specify the network domain, which would override the network domain in the EPG; this is important when an EP can belong to mulitple EPGs
17:52:05 <tbachman> #info Sanjay asks what can be done when an EP doesn’t have a network domain — doesn’t want to touch a bunch of EPs in order to update a domain
17:52:16 <tbachman> #info alagalah says this is being looked at — not sure of the specifics just yet
17:52:42 <tbachman> #info alagalah says this could be handled by a network domain EPG
18:07:57 <tbachman> #endmeeting