===========================================
#opendaylight-group-policy: gbp_status_arch
===========================================


Meeting started by tbachman at 17:00:03 UTC.  The full logs are
available at
http://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-group-policy/2015/gbp_status_arch/opendaylight-group-policy-gbp_status_arch.2015-03-13-17.00.log.html
.



Meeting summary
---------------

* agenda  (tbachman, 17:00:12)
  * LINK:
    https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-group-policy/2015/gbp_status_arch/opendaylight-group-policy-gbp_status_arch.2015-02-27-18.02.html
    Minutes from last week’s meeting  (tbachman, 17:01:16)

* Trello  (tbachman, 17:03:32)
  * alagalah, martin_sunal, and others have been working on the neutron
    provider  (tbachman, 17:10:51)
  * Worked out a lot of the mappings, but still some more work to be
    done  (tbachman, 17:11:02)
  * yapeng moved the port name from openstack-endpoint renderer to the
    generic endpoint; moved the URI in openstack, and changed the port
    name  (tbachman, 17:11:53)
  * yapeng says the code has been merged to the master branch, for kilo,
    and will be back-ported to the Juno branch  (tbachman, 17:12:10)
  * yapeng says both openstack-gbp and regular gpb were validated
    against yapeng’s work  (tbachman, 17:12:32)
  * Sanjay asks if the augmentation for the port has been added to the
    northbound  (tbachman, 17:12:55)
  * alagalah says he’ll address that in a minute  (tbachman, 17:13:03)
  * yapeng says from the openstack side, the change has been completed
    and merged — hoping to be completed/approved by the end fo the day
    (tbachman, 17:13:28)
  * alagalah says that having this back-ported to Juno will allow us to
    remove the old openstack-gbp code from ODL  (tbachman, 17:14:31)
  * alagalah says that we’re still in the same state with port-name — we
    didn’t want to break what yapeng was working on; alagalah saw the
    patch to change the port name and will try to look at it over the
    weekend  (tbachman, 17:15:55)
  * alagalah has added support for EPs being in multiple EPGs, but there
    are lots of implications; control plane part is done, data plane
    still being worked on  (tbachman, 17:17:17)
  * alagalah says when an EP was only part of a single EPG, network
    containment was simple — defined by EPG; with multi-EPG, this is
    defined by the EP.  (tbachman, 17:17:52)
  * Sanjays asks about moving network location from Endpoint  (tbachman,
    17:29:38)
  * alagalah says the EPG’s NetworkDomainID is more generic — the EP has
    an L2 and L3 context  (tbachman, 17:31:14)
  * alagalah introduces the architecture proposed for multi-EPG support
    (tbachman, 17:51:07)
  * alagalah says that the EP will be able to specify the network
    domain, which would override the network domain in the EPG; this is
    important when an EP can belong to mulitple EPGs  (tbachman,
    17:51:40)
  * Sanjay asks what can be done when an EP doesn’t have a network
    domain — doesn’t want to touch a bunch of EPs in order to update a
    domain  (tbachman, 17:52:05)
  * alagalah says this is being looked at — not sure of the specifics
    just yet  (tbachman, 17:52:16)
  * alagalah says this could be handled by a network domain EPG
    (tbachman, 17:52:42)



Meeting ended at 18:07:57 UTC.



People present (lines said)
---------------------------

* tbachman (26)
* odl_meetbot (4)
* alagalah (0)



Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4